What does 1 Chronicles 9:39 mean?
What is the meaning of 1 Chronicles 9:39?

Ner was the father of Kish

“ Ner was the father of Kish ”.

• This simple statement roots the narrative in real history, linking Saul’s line to Ner, a Benjamite (1 Chron 8:33; 1 Samuel 14:51).

• Chronicles opens chapter 9 with returned exiles; by naming Ner it reminds readers that God had preserved every branch of the tribe of Benjamin exactly as recorded (Jeremiah 1:11-12).

• The detail underscores God’s faithfulness to track families precisely, just as He tracks every believer’s name in His book (Malachi 3:16).


Kish was the father of Saul

“Kish was the father of Saul”.

• Kish, “a man of standing” (1 Samuel 9:1-2), fathered Israel’s first king.

• God chose Saul out of obscurity, showing that divine election—not human status—makes a leader (1 Samuel 10:1; Acts 13:21).

• The verse reassures returning exiles that God can raise new leaders for them as surely as He once raised Saul.


Saul was the father of Jonathan

“Saul was the father of Jonathan”.

• Jonathan’s courageous faith (1 Samuel 14:6-13) and covenant loyalty to David (1 Samuel 18:1-4; 20:17) shine against Saul’s later failures, proving that individual faithfulness can flourish even in a troubled household.

• His life illustrates Proverbs 17:17—“a friend loves at all times”—and reminds believers to stand for righteousness regardless of family pressures.


Saul was the father of Malchishua

• Malchishua fought beside his father and brothers at Mount Gilboa and fell in the same battle (1 Samuel 31:2).

• His mention confirms the tragic cost of Saul’s disobedience (1 Samuel 28:18), a sober warning that sin’s consequences often spread to loved ones.


Saul was the father of Abinadab

• Also called Ishvi (1 Samuel 14:49), Abinadab likewise died at Gilboa (1 Samuel 31:2).

• The verse records his name so that no descendant is lost to history, reminding readers that every person matters to God (Isaiah 49:16).


Saul was the father of Esh-baal

• Elsewhere called Ish-bosheth, he briefly ruled northern Israel after Saul (2 Samuel 2:8-10).

• His inclusion shows that even political rivals to David were fully acknowledged, demonstrating Scripture’s impartial honesty (2 Samuel 3:10).

• His eventual downfall (2 Samuel 4:1-12) highlights God’s unalterable decision to establish David’s house (2 Samuel 7:12-16).


summary

1 Chronicles 9:39 anchors the post-exilic community in its ancestral story, proving God’s meticulous care over lineage, leadership, and covenant history. Each name validates the reliability of Scripture and illustrates truths about divine choice, human responsibility, and the far-reaching effects of obedience or sin. The verse calls believers to trust God’s detailed oversight of their own lives and families, just as He faithfully tracked the house of Saul through every triumph and tragedy.

Why is the genealogy of Saul important in the context of 1 Chronicles?
Top of Page
Top of Page