What is the meaning of 2 Samuel 16:3? Where is your master’s grandson? David, driven from Jerusalem by Absalom’s coup (2 Samuel 15:13-14), meets Ziba on the road (16:1-2). His first concern is the welfare and loyalty of Mephibosheth, Jonathan’s crippled son (2 Samuel 4:4; 9:1-13). • The question shows covenant faithfulness; David still honors his promise to Jonathan (1 Samuel 20:14-17). • It tests allegiance in a crisis, much as David previously tested Ittai (2 Samuel 15:19-21). • It reminds Ziba that stewardship carries responsibility (Luke 12:42-44). Indeed, he is staying in Jerusalem Ziba claims Mephibosheth remained behind. Scripture records the statement; it does not guarantee its truthfulness (2 Samuel 19:24-28 reveals a different story). • Ziba times his report when David cannot verify it, illustrating Proverbs 18:17. • The report slanders Mephibosheth while flattering David—classic manipulation (Psalm 55:21). • David’s later division of the estate (19:29) shows how hard it is to sift motives under pressure (De 19:15). Today, the house of Israel will restore to me the kingdom of my grandfather Ziba attributes ambition to Mephibosheth: hoping the chaos will return Saul’s throne to his line. • The idea ignores God’s clear transfer of kingship to David (1 Samuel 15:28; 2 Samuel 5:1-3). • If true, it reveals staggering ingratitude toward David’s mercy (2 Samuel 9:7-10). • If false—as Mephibosheth later insists—it exposes Ziba’s greed; he soon receives all Saul’s land (2 Samuel 16:4; James 4:2). • The episode warns that upheaval tempts people to grasp for power (Jeremiah 17:5-6). summary 2 Samuel 16:3 records Ziba’s answer, offered when David is vulnerable. The verse underscores covenant loyalty, the danger of slander, and the limits of human judgment. Whether Ziba lied or Mephibosheth dreamed of power, God’s anointed king remained David, and the Lord would ultimately vindicate truth (1 Samuel 16:7; Hebrews 4:13). |
    |