What is the meaning of 2 Samuel 3:6? during the war “Now the war between the house of Saul and the house of David was prolonged” (2 Samuel 3:1). This verse places 2 Samuel 3:6 in an extended season of conflict that began after Saul’s death (1 Samuel 31:6) and Ish-bosheth’s elevation by Abner (2 Samuel 2:8–10). • The conflict is not a single battle but a drawn-out struggle, much like the earlier, long-running hostilities between Israel and the Philistines (1 Samuel 14:52). • God had already declared that David would reign (1 Samuel 16:1, 12–13), yet David waited on the Lord rather than forcing the outcome (2 Samuel 2:1). • The long war serves God’s larger purpose: displaying David’s patience and proving the weakness of Saul’s dynasty apart from the Lord (2 Samuel 3:1, 10). between the house of Saul and the house of David The word “house” speaks of a royal household—administration, loyal tribes, and military forces. • Saul’s “house” centers in Mahanaim east of the Jordan (2 Samuel 2:8–9), held together by Abner’s skill more than by Ish-bosheth’s charisma (2 Samuel 3:11). • David’s “house” rules from Hebron in Judah (2 Samuel 2:4, 11). Though smaller, it carries the covenant promise of kingship (2 Samuel 7:8–16 foretold; see also 1 Samuel 20:42). • The division reminds us of earlier family rivalries—Jacob and Esau (Genesis 25:23), Joseph and his brothers (Genesis 37:4)—yet God consistently preserves the chosen line. Abner had continued Abner, Saul’s cousin and former general (1 Samuel 14:50), refuses to fade into the background. • He installs Ish-bosheth as king (2 Samuel 2:8) and leads Saul’s forces at Gibeon (2 Samuel 2:12–17). • Even after losing key warriors like Asahel (2 Samuel 2:23), Abner remains the driving force, showing both ambition and loyalty—traits that later pivot toward David (2 Samuel 3:12). • His persistence echoes other dominant figures who shape Israel’s history for better or worse, such as Joab under David (2 Samuel 11:14–16) and Jeroboam after Solomon (1 Kings 12:20). to strengthen his position in the house of Saul “Abner had continued to strengthen his position in the house of Saul” (2 Samuel 3:6). The phrase points to calculated consolidation: • Political moves: Abner commands the army, controls access to the king, and likely manages alliances (2 Samuel 2:9). • Personal leverage: taking Saul’s concubine Rizpah (2 Samuel 3:7) is a bid for royal legitimacy—similar to Absalom’s later act (2 Samuel 16:21–22). • Growing influence: elders of Israel listen to him (2 Samuel 3:17), indicating his sway has outgrown Ish-bosheth’s. • Spiritual backdrop: every step Abner takes to prop up Saul’s fading house runs against the Lord’s declared plan for David, yet God sovereignly uses even Abner’s self-interest to advance that plan (Proverbs 19:21). summary 2 Samuel 3:6 highlights Abner’s steady effort to buttress Saul’s fragile dynasty during a drawn-out civil war. While David waits on God’s timing, Abner maneuvers politically and militarily to keep power—going so far as to eclipse Ish-bosheth himself. The verse underscores the contrast between human self-promotion and God’s sure promise to establish David’s throne, reminding us that no amount of earthly strategizing can overturn the Lord’s sovereign purposes (Psalm 33:10–11). |
    |