What does 2 Samuel 3:8 mean?
What is the meaning of 2 Samuel 3:8?

Abner was furious over Ish-bosheth’s accusation

Abner, commander of Saul’s army, had kept Saul’s dynasty afloat for two years after Saul’s death (2 Samuel 2:8-10). When Ish-bosheth suggested impropriety, Abner’s anger flared. His reaction shows:

• personal offense—he expected gratitude, not suspicion (cf. Proverbs 17:13).

• political frustration—he had held the fragile kingdom together “by strength of hand” (2 Samuel 3:6).

• a foreshadowing of his shift toward David (2 Samuel 3:9-10).


“Am I the head of a dog that belongs to Judah?”

Calling someone a “dog” signified contempt (1 Samuel 24:14; 2 Samuel 9:8). Abner twists the insult:

• “head of a dog” suggests a worthless leader.

• “that belongs to Judah” hints at Ish-bosheth’s fear of Abner siding with David, Judah’s king (2 Samuel 2:4).

Abner denies any hidden Judahite allegiance—ironic, because he is about to embrace David openly.


“All this time I have been loyal to the house of your father Saul, to his brothers, and to his friends.”

For years Abner:

• installed Ish-bosheth in Mahanaim (2 Samuel 2:8-9).

• fought Joab at Gibeon to defend Saul’s house (2 Samuel 2:12-17).

• protected Saul’s relatives and allies.

His loyalty echoes Jonathan’s earlier faithfulness to Saul (1 Samuel 31:2) and highlights Ish-bosheth’s ingratitude.


“I have not delivered you into the hand of David”

Abner reminds Ish-bosheth that he restrained his own power:

• he could have surrendered Saul’s kingdom to David long ago (2 Samuel 3:1).

• he guarded Ish-bosheth despite David’s growing strength (2 Samuel 3:6).

Like David sparing Saul twice (1 Samuel 24:4-7; 26:9-11), Abner shows that withholding harm proves loyalty.


“But now you accuse me of wrongdoing with this woman!”

Ish-bosheth charged Abner with taking Rizpah, Saul’s concubine (2 Samuel 3:7). In royal circles such an act claimed the throne (cf. 2 Samuel 16:21-22). Abner rejects the allegation, yet:

• the mere suggestion undermines their relationship.

• the insult becomes the tipping point for Abner to transfer the kingdom to David (2 Samuel 3:12-13).


summary

2 Samuel 3:8 records Abner’s indignant reply to Ish-bosheth’s baseless charge. He protests that he has been nothing but a faithful guardian of Saul’s dynasty, denies any disloyalty to the northern tribes, and resents being branded as a traitorous usurper. Ish-bosheth’s mistrust severs Abner’s allegiance, setting in motion the reunification of Israel under David—showing how unfounded accusations can unravel kingdoms, while God’s sovereign plan for David’s throne moves forward unhindered.

How does 2 Samuel 3:7 reflect the cultural significance of concubines in biblical times?
Top of Page
Top of Page