How does 2 Samuel 3:7 reflect the cultural significance of concubines in biblical times? Text in Focus “Meanwhile, Saul had a concubine named Rizpah daughter of Aiah. And Ish-bosheth said to Abner, ‘Why have you slept with my father’s concubine?’” (2 Samuel 3:7) Historical Setting After Saul’s death (1 Samuel 31), Israel split: the northern tribes followed Ish-bosheth (Saul’s surviving son) under the general Abner, while Judah crowned David in Hebron (2 Samuel 2:1–11). Possession of Saul’s royal harem—particularly any sexual contact with it—signified a claim to Saul’s throne (cf. 2 Samuel 12:8; 16:21–22; 1 Kings 2:22). Abner’s alleged liaison with Rizpah therefore struck Ish-bosheth as open treason, provoking a break that brought the northern kingdom over to David (2 Samuel 3:9–21). Definition and Social Role of a Concubine 1. A concubine (Heb. pîlegeš) was a legally recognized secondary wife—lower in status than a full wife but enjoying protection, food, clothing, and conjugal rights (Exodus 21:10–11). 2. She could be acquired through purchase (Genesis 16:3), capture in war (Deuteronomy 21:10-14), or gift (Genesis 29:24). 3. Children she bore were legitimate but ranked below those of primary wives for inheritance (Genesis 25:5-6). 4. Scripture never commands concubinage; it records it descriptively. Narrative tensions and later prophetic critique expose its underlying disorder (Malachi 2:15; Matthew 19:4-6). Legal and Cultural Background • Nuzi tablets (15th c. BC) and the Code of Hammurabi (§§ 144-146) show that ancient Near-Eastern concubines could be given to a barren wife to produce heirs; the practice matches Sarai’s gift of Hagar to Abram (Genesis 16:1-2). • The Mari archives name political concubines housed in royal harems, reinforcing the idea that a king’s concubines were part of the dynastic estate. • Egyptian records from Amarna (14th c. BC) list “junior wives” sent as diplomatic gifts, paralleling Solomon’s international marriages (1 Kings 11:1-3). Dynastic Significance in 2 Samuel 3:7 Possessing a deceased king’s concubine amounted to a public claim to succeed him: • Absalom lies with David’s concubines “in the sight of all Israel” to signal his usurpation (2 Samuel 16:21-22). • Adonijah seeks Abishag, David’s former concubine; Solomon judges the request a bid for the crown and orders his execution (1 Kings 2:13-25). Thus Ish-bosheth’s charge against Abner was weighty; the accusation implied Abner was usurping Saul’s throne. Abner’s fury (2 Samuel 3:8-10) confirms he grasped the dynastic overtones. Moral and Theological Evaluation God tolerated concubinage within fallen cultures yet never endorsed it as His creational ideal (Genesis 2:24). The tension surfaces repeatedly: • Rivalry and grief for Hagar (Genesis 16) and for Bilhah/Zilpah (Genesis 30). • Murder and civil war sparked by the rape of a concubine (Judges 19–21). • Political chaos in 2 Samuel 3–4 and later rebellions. By recording these outcomes, the Spirit underscores that multiplying wives was forbidden for kings (Deuteronomy 17:17) and that marital exclusivity prefigures Christ’s singular union with His Church (Ephesians 5:25-32). Archaeological Corroboration • The tenth-century BC “House of David” stele (Tel Dan) confirms a Davidic dynasty, lending external support to the narratives that follow the concubine dispute. • Excavations at Khirbet Qeiyafa show administrative centers consistent with a united monarchy, situating the Saul–David transition in real history. • Ostraca from Samaria (8th c. BC) document royal estates managed by palace women, echoing the political function of harems. Christological Trajectory The disorder surrounding concubines magnifies humanity’s need for a sinless Bridegroom. Jesus, the greater Son of David, takes one Bride—His Church—purchased with His blood (Revelation 19:7-9). Where ancient kings seized concubines to assert power, Christ lays down His life to save and sanctify. Practical Applications 1. Sexual relations carry covenantal and communal implications; private immorality can destabilize entire societies. 2. Leadership must model God’s design for marriage; deviations breed political and spiritual turmoil. 3. Scripture’s candor about patriarchs’ failures authenticates its historicity and warns believers against repeating their errors. Summary 2 Samuel 3:7 reflects the cultural weight concubines bore as symbols of royal authority. Abner’s alleged act was tantamount to staking a claim on Saul’s throne, an interpretation attested by biblical parallels and Near-Eastern evidence. While concubinage was embedded in ancient society, Scripture chronicles its destructive fallout, ultimately pointing to the exclusive, covenantal union between Christ and His redeemed people. |
    |