What is the meaning of Genesis 34:18? Their offer • Jacob’s sons had proposed that Hamor’s people be circumcised so intermarriage could occur (Genesis 34:13-17). • The suggestion appears as a legitimate diplomatic exchange, mirroring earlier covenant language (cf. Genesis 17:10-14). • By receiving an “offer,” Hamor and Shechem believe they are participants, not targets, in the negotiation—echoing the deceptive truce in Joshua 9:3-15 where Gibeon also accepts terms without perceiving hidden motives. Seemed good • The phrase highlights their immediate, positive reaction—showing eagerness rather than discernment (Proverbs 14:12). • “Good” here is not moral goodness but perceived advantage: the promise of land, wealth, and alliance (Genesis 34:9-10). • Like Esau who valued a meal over his birthright (Genesis 25:29-34), they judge by surface benefits, overlooking spiritual implications. To Hamor and his son • Father and son stand united, reflecting a household decision (Joshua 24:15). • Yet Scripture repeatedly warns that leaders can drag families into sin when following worldly gain (1 Kings 21:25-26; Acts 5:1-10). • Their joined approval contrasts with Jacob’s divided household, where sons act independently (Genesis 34:30-31). Shechem • Shechem’s personal desire for Dinah drives the entire narrative (Genesis 34:3-4); emotion overrides righteousness (2 Samuel 13:1-2). • His acceptance of circumcision for lust’s sake underscores how fleshly motives can counterfeit covenantal signs (Romans 2:28-29). • Like Pharaoh later consenting under duress (Exodus 12:31-32), Shechem’s “yes” is self-serving, not God-honoring. summary Genesis 34:18 records a swift, positive response from Hamor and Shechem to Jacob’s sons’ proposal. They evaluate the terms by apparent advantage—alliances, wealth, personal desire—without seeking God’s counsel or discerning hidden intent. Their agreement exposes the folly of judging by immediate benefit rather than covenant faithfulness, a caution echoed throughout Scripture. |
    |