What does Jeremiah 43:4 mean?
What is the meaning of Jeremiah 43:4?

So

Jeremiah opens the verse with a simple connector that ties this act of disobedience to all that came before (Jeremiah 42:1–22).

• “So” looks back to the earnest promise Johanan and the people made in 42:5–6—“Whether it is pleasant or unpleasant, we will obey the LORD our God.”

• It also links directly to the clear warning God gave in 42:19, “Do not go to Egypt.”

• The word therefore signals tragic irony: the very people who vowed obedience now pivot to rebellion, echoing Israel’s past failures (Exodus 32:8).


Johanan son of Kareah

Johanan had shown courage in rescuing captives from Ishmael (Jeremiah 41:11–16), and he sounded sincere when asking Jeremiah to seek God’s will (42:1–4).

• His name stands first, underlining personal responsibility. Spiritual leadership matters; when leaders turn, others follow (Numbers 13:30–14:4).

• Like Saul sparing Agag (1 Samuel 15:13–24), Johanan lets fear and human logic override faith.


and all the commanders of the forces

Every military leader joins Johanan, showing a unified but misguided front.

• Their identity as “commanders” recalls earlier loyalty to Gedaliah (40:7–9) yet now shifts to distrust of Babylon and reliance on Egypt, repeating Judah’s old political sins (Isaiah 31:1).

• Collective disobedience magnifies guilt (Acts 5:1–11 shows a New-Testament parallel of shared rebellion).


disobeyed the command of the LORD

The Hebrew narrative stresses willful rebellion, not accidental error.

• God’s “command” had just been delivered with unmistakable clarity (42:10–12, 15–18).

• Disobeying divine instruction invites covenant curses (Deuteronomy 28:15); Jeremiah had warned that going to Egypt would bring “the sword you fear” (42:16).

• The episode illustrates James 4:17: “Whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin.”

• Note the contrast with earlier models of obedience—Noah (Genesis 6:22) and Joshua (Joshua 11:15).


to stay in the land of Judah

God had promised protection and rebuilding if they remained (42:10–12).

• Judah, though ruined, was still the place of covenant blessing; Egypt symbolized worldly security and past bondage (Jeremiah 24:6; Hosea 11:1).

• The call to “stay” echoes Psalm 37:3, “Trust in the LORD and do good; dwell in the land and cultivate faithfulness.”

• Their flight to Egypt prefigures every believer’s temptation to abandon divine promises for visible safety (Hebrews 10:35–39).


summary

Jeremiah 43:4 records a decisive, collective refusal to trust God’s explicit word. Johanan and his commanders, fearful of Babylon and confident in human strategy, reject the Lord’s promise of protection in Judah. Their choice repeats Israel’s historic pattern of professed loyalty followed by rebellion, reminding us that genuine faith obeys even when circumstances appear threatening. The verse warns believers to heed God’s clear commands, rely on His safeguarding presence, and resist the lure of worldly solutions that ultimately lead to judgment.

What historical context led to the events in Jeremiah 43:3?
Top of Page
Top of Page