What is the meaning of Judges 19:10? But the man was unwilling to spend the night. – The Levite has already lingered five days with his father-in-law (Judges 19:4-8) and senses urgency to resume the journey. – His refusal underscores a concern for purposeful stewardship of time (Ephesians 5:15-16) and a desire to keep obligations to serve in Ephraim. – It also reveals caution toward lingering in a Canaanite locale where covenantal hospitality might be lacking, recalling Israel’s call to remain distinct (Deuteronomy 7:3-6). He got up and departed – Initiative replaces passivity; the Levite chooses movement rather than comfort, echoing Abraham’s obedience to press on after pauses (Genesis 12:4). – The text shows an exercise of headship: he “got up” first, leading those with him (compare Joshua 24:15, “as for me and my house”). – Spiritual takeaway: decisive obedience often guards against compromise (James 4:17). And arrived opposite Jebus (that is, Jerusalem) – The writer notes the Canaanite name Jebus to remind readers that Jerusalem was not yet in Israelite control (Judges 1:21). – Choosing to bypass a pagan city rather than sleep there mirrors Lot’s earlier reluctance to remain in Sodom once warned (Genesis 19:15-17). – The narrative sets up the tragic events that follow in Gibeah, highlighting how seeking fellowship among God’s people should be safer—though in this case Israel’s moral decay proves otherwise (Judges 19:12-15). With his two saddled donkeys and his concubine – The provisioned donkeys indicate preparedness (Luke 14:28), reinforcing the Levite’s responsibility for his household and animals (Proverbs 27:23). – Mentioning the concubine again reminds us of restored relationship after her earlier departure (Judges 19:2-3), yet foreshadows her vulnerability amid Israel’s lawlessness. – The detail demonstrates Scripture’s literal historical reporting, setting the stage for a sober illustration of covenant breakdown (Hosea 4:1-2). summary Judges 19:10 records a decisive but perilous choice: the Levite refuses another night’s delay, leads his household away from questionable surroundings, and presses toward what he expects will be safer Israelite territory. His practical diligence and separation from pagan influence are commendable, yet the verse also foreshadows Israel’s internal corruption that will surface in Gibeah. The passage challenges readers to combine prompt obedience with discernment, recognizing that true safety is found only where God’s covenant standards are honored. |
    |