What is the meaning of Luke 20:5? They deliberated among themselves - Picture the temple courts buzzing with people while the chief priests, scribes, and elders huddle in whispered debate (Luke 20:1-2). - Their private consultation shows that the issue is not lack of evidence but a crisis of will. Rather than go to God for wisdom (James 1:5), they lean on political calculation. - Similar moments appear in John 11:47-48, where leaders fear the loss of influence more than they fear God. - Their hidden plotting contrasts sharply with Jesus’ open proclamation of truth (John 18:20). and said - The phrase signals a unanimous decision; they move from thinking to formulating an answer. - Proverbs 18:2 warns that fools delight not in understanding but only in airing their opinions. The leaders fulfill that proverb—speaking to protect status, not to pursue truth. - In Acts 4:15-17 the same pattern recurs: once again, leaders step aside, confer, and craft a tactical reply instead of bowing to clear evidence. If we say, ‘From heaven,’ - They acknowledge that John’s baptism may indeed have divine origin (Luke 3:2-6). - By framing the dilemma this way, they tacitly admit God was at work—but they refuse to embrace it (Matthew 21:25). - Elijah faced a similar choice from the people: “If the LORD is God, follow Him” (1 Kings 18:21). Waffling is impossible when heavenly authority is on the line. He will ask, - Jesus’ question exposes hearts (Hebrews 4:12-13). - The leaders know He will press the logical consequence: accepting John means accepting Jesus, because John pointed to Him (John 1:29-34). - The thought of answering to Jesus’ probing inquiry terrifies them more than answering to God, revealing upside-down priorities (Galatians 1:10). Why did you not believe him? - Belief is not mere agreement; it requires repentance and submission (Luke 3:8-9). - Rejecting John equals rejecting God’s purpose (Luke 7:29-30). - Unbelief always carries accountability: “This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness” (John 3:19). summary The leaders’ inner debate in Luke 20:5 shows that they know the truth yet refuse it because submission would cost them authority. Their calculated answer reveals an unbelieving heart, preferring political self-preservation over humble faith. The passage warns that when confronted with divine authority, hesitation and calculation are forms of rebellion; genuine belief requires wholehearted surrender to the truth God reveals. |
    |