What does Numbers 36:2 mean?
What is the meaning of Numbers 36:2?

When the LORD commanded my lord

The tribal leaders open by acknowledging that Moses acts under God’s direct orders. This respectful phrase reminds us of Moses’ unique role as the mouthpiece of the LORD (Numbers 12:7–8; Deuteronomy 34:10). Their appeal rests not on personal preference but on divine authority, a pattern seen throughout the wilderness journey (Exodus 16:28; Numbers 15:31). By grounding their request in what “the LORD commanded,” they underline that every inheritance decision must align with God’s revealed will.


to give the land as an inheritance to the Israelites by lot

Casting lots placed the distribution firmly in God’s hands (Numbers 26:55; Proverbs 16:33).

• Lots eliminated human favoritism, ensuring each tribe accepted its God-appointed portion (Joshua 14:1–2; 18:10).

• Calling the land an “inheritance” highlights permanence; the land was a gift meant to stay within each tribe forever (Leviticus 25:23).

• This phrase therefore affirms that the upcoming settlement in Canaan is God’s covenant promise fulfilled (Genesis 15:18; Psalm 105:11).


He also commanded him

The leaders seamlessly connect the general land command with a specific directive already given. God’s instructions are consistent and comprehensive: if He orders the broad allotment, He also covers individual cases (Numbers 27:5–7). Moses’ authority extends to both, showing that no detail of Israel’s life is outside divine concern (Deuteronomy 6:24; Psalm 19:7–9).


to give the inheritance of our brother Zelophehad to his daughters

This recalls the earlier ruling where the LORD upheld the daughters’ right to their father’s land (Numbers 27:1–11).

• The phrase “our brother” emphasizes clan solidarity; Zelophehad’s daughters are not outsiders but members whose welfare affects the whole tribe (Romans 12:5).

• Granting them property preserved their father’s name, fulfilling the cultural and covenantal goal that no tribe lose its heritage (Numbers 36:5–7; Ruth 4:5).

• Later Joshua honors this verdict when he apportions land west of the Jordan: “So Manasseh received ten shares besides the land of Gilead and Bashan… because the daughters of Manasseh received an inheritance” (Joshua 17:3–6).


summary

Numbers 36:2 anchors the inheritance question in God’s unchanging commands. The leaders remind Moses that the same divine authority that assigned land by lot also guaranteed Zelophehad’s daughters their portion. By linking the general and the specific, the verse underscores God’s fairness, His concern for every family, and the reliability of His word—a lesson still reassuring to all who trust His promises today.

How does Numbers 36:1 reflect the cultural norms of ancient Israelite society?
Top of Page
Top of Page