What historical context supports the claim in Psalm 135:5? Canonical Text “For I know that the LORD is great; our Lord is above all gods.” (Psalm 135:5) Immediate Literary Context Psalm 135 is a temple hymn that strings together phrases from earlier Scriptures (e.g., Exodus 3–15; Psalm 115; 136). Verses 8-12 rehearse Yahweh’s acts in Egypt, the wilderness, and the conquest, while verses 15-18 mock the idols of the nations. Verse 5 therefore functions as the thesis: every saving act that follows proves that “the LORD is great…above all gods.” Authorship And Dating Internal markers (“Praise the LORD from the courts of the house of the LORD,” v.2) place composition after the first Temple’s dedication (c. 960 BC). The psalm also uses post-exilic vocabulary shared with Ezra–Nehemiah (“servants of the LORD,” “house of Levi”), suggesting editorial use during the restoration (538-432 BC). Thus the song would have been sung in Solomon’s Temple, preserved through exile, and re-sung by returning worshipers who had just witnessed Babylon’s pantheon humiliated by Persia—another providential reversal. Historical Setting: Worship And National Memory Ancient Israel’s calendar revolved around public recitation of salvation history (Exodus 12; Deuteronomy 16). Each pilgrim feast reminded the nation that Yahweh alone defeated Egypt’s gods (Exodus 12:12), dried the Red Sea (Exodus 14:31), fed the wilderness hosts (Exodus 16), toppled Canaanite kings (Joshua 12), and granted a land inheritance (Psalm 135:10-12). The singers of Psalm 135 therefore stood inside a living chain of testimony reaching back to c. 1446 BC (Exodus) and c. 1406–1375 BC (Conquest). The claim “our Lord is above all gods” is not abstract theology; it is courtroom evidence rehearsed annually before eyewitness descendants. Contrast With Contemporary Polytheism Egyptian theology (Pyramid Texts; Book of the Dead) deified the Nile, sun, animals, and Pharaoh. Ugaritic tablets (c. 1200 BC) list a pantheon (El, Baal, Asherah) that dominated Canaanite worship. Neo-Babylonian texts exalt Marduk and Ishtar; Persian inscriptions honor Ahura Mazda. Against that cultural backdrop, Israel’s exclusive monotheism was radical. Archeologists have unearthed household idols in Judean strata (e.g., Lachish Level III), confirming constant pressure to syncretize. Psalm 135:5 counters that pressure by reminding worshipers that no rival “god” ever split seas, shattered empires, or fulfilled covenant promises. Exodus Events As Primary Proof The ten plagues (Exodus 7–12) systematically judged Egypt’s deities: Hapi (Nile), Heqet (frogs), Geb (dust), Khepri (flies), Apis (livestock), Sekhmet (boils), Nut (hail), Seth (locusts), Ra (darkness), Pharaoh’s son (divine heir). Egyptian texts such as the Ipuwer Papyrus (Pap. Leiden 344) speak of the Nile turning to blood and nationwide chaos—echoes of the biblical record. The Ashkelon cow bones bearing Egyptian cultic markings show Egyptian religious influence in Canaan just before the Conquest, highlighting the polemical edge of Yahweh’s victory. Conquest Memorials Psalm 135:11 names Sihon and Og. Basalt royal beds uncovered at Rabbath-Ammon reflect late-Bronze “giant-king” traditions (Deuteronomy 3:11). The Israel-Stele of Pharaoh Merneptah (c. 1208 BC) already acknowledges Israel’s presence in Canaan, corroborating Joshua-Judges chronology. Stone-lined wine-presses and four-room houses appear abruptly in the highlands c. 1400 BC—material culture consistent with a nomadic population settling en masse, just as Scripture describes. Exile And Return As Fresh Validation Babylon claimed Marduk’s supremacy after toppling Jerusalem (2 Kings 25). Yet Isaiah 46 mocks Marduk’s idols that must be carried. Cyrus’s decree (Ezra 1) then proclaims, “The LORD, the God of heaven…has appointed me.” The Cyrus Cylinder confirms his policy of returning exiles and temple vessels. For post-exilic Levites singing Psalm 135, the fall of Babylon was contemporary proof that “our Lord is above all gods.” Archaeological And Documentary Corroboration • Dead Sea Scroll 11QPsa (c. 100 BC) preserves Psalm 135 almost verbatim, showing textual stability. • The Silver Ketef Hinnom amulets (c. 600 BC) bear the priestly benediction (Numbers 6), showing that Yahweh-exclusive worship pre-dated the exile. • The Tel Dan Inscription (9th cent. BC) references the “House of David,” confirming the royal line through which Messianic hope—and ultimate vindication of Yahweh—flows. Theological Implications For Ancient Israel 1. Covenant Certainty: If Yahweh is “above all gods,” His covenant (Genesis 15; Exodus 19; 2 Samuel 7) is inviolable. 2. Exclusive Worship: The Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4) demands undivided loyalty; Psalm 135 renews that demand. 3. Missional Testimony: Israel’s unique history invites surrounding nations to abandon idols and seek the living God (1 Kings 8:41-43; Psalm 96). Continuity Into The New Testament Acts 17:24-31 echoes Psalm 135:5 when Paul argues at Athens that the Creator “does not dwell in temples made by hands.” Jesus Himself cites Deuteronomy 6 (Mark 12:29-30), reaffirming Yahweh’s unrivaled greatness. The resurrection is the climactic historical validation: “He has furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead” (Acts 17:31). Practical Takeaway For Modern Readers The psalmist’s confidence rests on real events, not wishful thinking. From a behavioral-scientific angle, anchored memory of divine intervention strengthens communal identity and moral resilience. Philosophically, the argument is cumulative: creation, covenant history, fulfilled prophecy, and Christ’s resurrection converge to proclaim that “our Lord is above all gods.” The believer therefore glorifies God with the same assurance the Levitical choir voiced three millennia ago. |
    |