What historical context influenced the writing of Psalm 120:2? Text of Psalm 120:2 “Deliver my soul, O LORD, from lying lips and from a deceitful tongue.” Canonical Placement and Literary Form Psalm 120 opens the fifteen “Songs of Ascents” (Psalm 120-134), pilgrim hymns sung while Israel’s worshipers traveled up to Jerusalem for the three annual feasts (Deuteronomy 16:16). The superscription (“A Song of Ascents”) places the psalm within a liturgical setting connected to corporate covenant life, not private devotion alone. This setting immediately situates the request of verse 2 in the wider experience of a redeemed community surrounded by hostile voices as it journeys toward God’s appointed place of worship. Immediate Literary Context: Verses 1–7 Verse 2 is framed by a cry “In my distress I called to the LORD” (v.1) and a lament over dwelling “among Meshech” and “the tents of Kedar” (v.5)—remote, warlike peoples far from Zion. The psalmist’s plea therefore grows out of life in an alien environment marked by verbal hostility and cultural distance. Deceitful speech is not merely personal slander; it is the language of nations opposed to the covenant people. Probable Historical Settings 1. Davidic Wilderness Years (c. 1010–970 BC) • 1 Samuel 24–26 describes Saul’s court as a hotbed of intrigue where “men from Ziph went up to Saul… saying, ‘Is not David hiding among us?’” (24:1), a literal experience of treacherous tongues. • The superscriptions of Psalm 57, 59, and 142 link David’s earlier laments to that era. Similar vocabulary (“deliver,” “soul,” “distress,” “lying lips”) supports a Davidic origin or at least David-like circumstances. 2. Hezekiah’s Jerusalem under Assyrian Siege (701 BC) • Rabshakeh’s propaganda campaign (2 Kings 18:17-35) used calculated falsehoods to demoralize Judah: “Do not let Hezekiah deceive you… The LORD will not deliver you.” Verse 2’s plea for rescue from “lying lips” fits this historical moment when psychological warfare, not just military force, imperiled the covenant community. • Proverbs 25:1 notes that “Hezekiah’s men” copied many psalms; a Hezekian compilation of earlier and contemporary laments into the Songs of Ascents would explain Psalm 120’s placement at the head of a pilgrim collection used after the Assyrian crisis. 3. Early Post-Exilic Opposition (c. 538-445 BC) • Ezra 4 recounts adversaries who “came to Zerubbabel… saying, ‘Let us build with you.’” When refused, they “hired counselors to frustrate their purpose… and wrote an accusation against the inhabitants of Judah.” Here “lying lips” were formal letters to the Persian throne, slander couched in official rhetoric. • Archaeological parallels: the Elephantine Papyri (5th century BC) record Jews appealing to Persian officials against local hostility, demonstrating that malicious correspondence was a real, documented threat in this period. Because the psalm lacks internal markers of author or date, conservative scholarship recognizes that any of these settings—or a later liturgical reuse of an earlier composition—could supply the historical backdrop. The common denominator is the covenant people beset by hostile, deceit-filled speech while awaiting Yahweh’s deliverance. Geographical Clues: Meshech and Kedar (v.5) Meshech was a people in the region of Anatolia (modern Turkey; cf. Genesis 10:2; Ezekiel 27:13), and Kedar refers to nomadic Ishmaelite tribes in Arabia (Isaiah 21:16-17). These extreme north-south references function idiomatically: wherever Israelites sojourned away from Zion, they experienced cultural alienation and verbal animosity. Assyrian royal annals (e.g., the Prism of Sennacherib, British Museum K 3375) list both groups among tributaries, confirming their contemporaneity with an 8th-7th-century BC setting. Sociopolitical Climate of Deceit in the Ancient Near East Treaties often included “curse tablets” against perjury (Hittite Texts, KK Bo 9.8). The psalmist’s appeal to covenant curses in v.4 (“sharp arrows of the warrior, with burning coals of the broom tree”) matches an Ancient Near Eastern legal environment where false testimony warranted severe divine retribution. Clay bullae from Lachish (7th century BC) contain correspondence warning Judah’s commanders about “weak hands and fearful hearts,” corroborating the prevalence of demoralizing propaganda. Theological Trajectory toward the New Covenant Psalm 120:2 anticipates the Messiah who embodies truth (John 14:6) and faced false testimony (Matthew 26:59-60). By quoting this psalm during pilgrimages, Israel rehearsed reliance on Yahweh’s veracity amid deception, a theme climactically fulfilled when Christ “committed no sin, nor was any deceit found in His mouth” (1 Peter 2:22). Thus the historical context of slander points forward to the ultimate deliverer from the father of lies (John 8:44). Implications for Contemporary Discipleship Believers in every age inhabit cultural “Meshech and Kedar,” surrounded by ideologies that distort reality. Psalm 120:2 models urgent prayer rather than retaliatory slander, anchoring hope in the God who vindicates truth. Its historical roots prove that divine faithfulness outlasts every lying tongue—an assurance sealed by the resurrection of Christ, the definitive rebuttal to the greatest falsehood of all: that death has the last word. |
    |