What historical context surrounds the command in Joshua 1:6? Canonical Placement and Immediate Literary Setting Joshua is the sixth book of the canon and the bridge between the Pentateuch and the Historical Books. Joshua 1 opens immediately after “Moses the servant of the LORD” has died (De 34:5). The leadership mantle passes to Joshua, “Moses’ assistant” (Joshua 1:1). Verse 6 contains the first of three divine imperatives—“Be strong and courageous, for you shall give this people possession of the land that I swore to their fathers to give them.” The context is the formal commissioning of a new leader on the east bank of the Jordan, poised to begin the conquest of Canaan. Chronological Framework • Young-earth, conservative chronology places the Exodus at 1446 BC (1 Kings 6:1 counts 480 years before Solomon’s temple c. 966 BC). • Forty years of wilderness wandering terminates in 1406 BC (Numbers 14:33–35). • Joshua 1 therefore sits in 1406 BC, after Moses’ death on Mount Nebo but before the springtime Jordan crossing (Joshua 3:15). Usshur’s timeline accords with this, fixing Creation c. 4004 BC, Flood c. 2348 BC, Abraham c. 1996 BC, and hence the patriarchal promises that undergird Joshua 1:6 at roughly the early second millennium BC. Geographical Setting Camped at Shittim (modern Tell el-Hammam/Tall el-Kefrein area), Israel overlooks the lower Jordan Rift. Across the river lie the Canaanite strongholds of Jericho and Ai, backed by the central hill country. The visible terrain dramatizes the promise Yahweh is about to fulfill (Deuteronomy 34:1–4). Covenantal Backdrop 1. Abrahamic Covenant (Genesis 12:1–7; 15:18–21; 17:7-8) – land, seed, blessing. 2. Sinaitic Covenant (Exodus 19–24) – stipulations for occupying the land. 3. Mosaic Succession Prophecy (Deuteronomy 31:7-8, 23) – “Be strong and courageous.” Joshua 1:6 echoes Moses’ final charge word-for-word, showing continuity of covenant leadership. The imperative has thus a historical lineage: promise (Abraham), legal framework (Sinai), prophetic handoff (Moses), and now operational fulfillment (Joshua). Military-Strategic Context The Late Bronze Age (LB IIB) saw a weakened Egyptian grip on Canaan. Canaanite city-states were fortified yet often mutually hostile (Amarna Letters, EA 286–290). Militarily, Israel faces walled cities (Jericho’s double wall system exposed by Garstang, renewed by Bryant Wood’s pottery analysis confirming a 15th-century destruction layer), chariot forces (Joshua 17:16), and coalitions (Joshua 10–11). The divine call for courage is therefore grounded in realistic human fear of formidable opposition. Sociocultural Environment Israel enters a land steeped in Amorite, Hittite, Perizzite, Hivite, and Jebusite cultures (Joshua 3:10). Ritual child sacrifice, sacred prostitution, and idolatry dominate (Leviticus 18; Deuteronomy 12:31). The conquest serves both the inheritance motif and the judgment motif (Genesis 15:16). Joshua must enforce exclusive Yahwistic worship amid polytheistic pressures—a behavioral context that heightens the need for strength and steadfastness. Archaeological Corroborations • Tell el-Hammam survey data identify acacia groves (Heb. ha-šittîm) consistent with “Shittim.” • The Merneptah Stele (c. 1210 BC) references a people “Israel” already inhabiting Canaan within a generation of the conquest—external evidence that Israel was in the land by the late 13th century, fitting an earlier entry date. • Late Bronze Age pottery and plastered cisterns at Khirbet el-Maqatir (candidate for Ai) verify a short occupation horizon around 1400 BC, paralleling the biblical narrative. Theological Emphasis The command merges divine sovereignty with human responsibility. Yahweh will “give” (nātan) the land, yet Joshua must “cause this people to inherit” (tanchîl). The historical context is therefore not fatalistic; it is participatory. Human agency acts within the framework of divine promise. Foreshadowing Redemptive History The conquest prefigures the greater “Joshua” (Greek Iēsous, i.e., Jesus) who secures eternal rest (Hebrews 4:8-10). The historical call to courage anticipates the Christian’s mandate to proclaim resurrection hope amid opposition (Acts 4:13). Practical Implications for the Original Audience The second-generation Israelites (Numbers 26) have only known nomadic life. They face settled, technologically advanced foes. Joshua 1:6 confronts their fear of the unknown by rooting confidence in a verifiable past: the Exodus miracles, Sinai theophany, and victories east of Jordan (Sihon and Og). Memory of these events provides empirical reason to trust. Modern Application Believers today stand on the shoulders of a historically resurrected Christ (1 Colossians 15:3-8). Just as archaeological strata confirm the 15th-century Jericho burn layer, historical bedrock confirms the empty tomb (cited by Tacitus, Josephus, and attested in 1 Corinthians 15 creedal material dated within five years post-crucifixion). Courage thus rests not in abstraction but in historical fact. Conclusion Joshua 1:6 emerges from a well-defined moment—1406 BC, east of the Jordan, after forty wilderness years, in the long continuum of a covenant first cut with Abraham. The command for strength and courage addresses real geopolitical, cultural, and military challenges, yet it is anchored in Yahweh’s irrevocable oath and confirmed by textual, archaeological, and theological evidence. |
    |