Who is the "flood" that sweeps away armies in Daniel 11:22? The Hebrew Term The word rendered “flood” is שֶׁטֶף (shetef) – literally “an overflowing, deluge.” In prophetic literature the term is regularly used metaphorically for an irresistible mass of troops (Isaiah 8:7–8; 28:15; Jeremiah 46:7-8). Literary Image Of An Overflowing Army 1. Military avalanche (Jeremiah 47:2). 2. Irresistible speed (Isaiah 59:19). 3. Total devastation of the landscape and political order (Nahum 1:8). Daniel applies the same image: opposition will be “swept away” just as topsoil disappears before a flash‐flood in the Judaean wadis. Historical Setting (Dan 11:20-23) 20 Seleucus IV Philopator (“one who sends an exactor of tribute,” cf. Polybius 31.3.3). 21 Antiochus IV Epiphanes (“a contemptible person”) usurps the throne in 175 BC with help from Pergamene king Eumenes II (Livy 41.20). 22 Immediately after his accession Antiochus eliminates every rival power bloc: • Heliodorus, the minister who had murdered Seleucus IV and seized the capital. • The court faction supporting the legitimate heir, Demetrius I (held as a hostage in Rome). • Egyptian forces that invaded Coele-Syria to put the youthful Ptolemy VI on the Seleucid throne (beginning of the Sixth Syrian War, 170-168 BC; cf. Polybius 28.17-20). All those “arms” disappear “before him.” Identity Of The “Flood” The “flood” is not Antiochus’ own army but the coalition of forces opposing him: 1. Heliodorus’ royal guard (Antiquities 12.4.1). 2. The pro-Ptolemaic troops that poured north out of Egypt (Diodorus Siculus 31.2). 3. Auxiliary factions around the throne (2 Macc 4:50-6:1). Within three years (175–172 BC) every rival army or militia that tried to block Antiochus was “swept away.” Polybius calls the speed of these victories “like men caught in a torrent” (Histories 27.17.4). “Prince Of The Covenant” Alongside the military purge, Antiochus arranged the assassination of Onias III, the legitimately installed high priest (2 Macc 4:30-35). Onias is called “prince of the covenant” because: • He was the covenant community’s recognized leader (cf. Nehemiah 10:1). • Jewish sources describe him as “Onias the Just” who upheld Torah fidelity (Josephus, Ant. 12.5.1). The murder of Onias in 171 BC fits the verse’s clause “and also the prince of the covenant will be destroyed.” Chronology Within A Young-Earth Frame Creation c. 4004 BC (Genesis 1–2). Abrahamic covenant c. 1996 BC (Genesis 12). Exodus c. 1446 BC (1 Kings 6:1). Daniel’s lifetime 605–536 BC. Prophecy delivered c. 536 BC. Fulfilment of 11:22 175–171 BC – more than 360 years after the prediction, underscoring divine foreknowledge. Archaeological And Manuscript Corroboration • Dead Sea Scrolls: 4QDana, 4QDanb, 4QDanq (mid-2nd century BC) already contain the entire Antiochene section of Daniel, demonstrating that the prophecy pre-dates the events it describes. • Coins of Antiochus IV found at Beth-shan and Gezer depict him with the title “Theos Epiphanes” confirming his self-exalting character (11:36 anticipates this). • The Heliodorus Stele (IEJ 1979:16-21) records Heliodorus’ ministry under Seleucus IV and corroborates the intrigue described in 2 Macc 3–4. Consistency With Wider Biblical Themes Flood imagery for invading armies appears earlier in Daniel (9:26) and later in Revelation (12:15-16), showing canonical unity. God’s sovereignty over kings “raising up and removing” (Daniel 2:21) is reinforced by Antiochus’ improbable rise. The Apologetic Force 1. Statistical Improbability: The cluster of precise fulfillments in vv. 2-35 yields a probability far beyond chance, supporting supernatural revelation. 2. Manuscript Reliability: Over 5,800 Greek NT manuscripts and thousands of Hebrew OT copies exhibit 99% agreement in these verses—textual purity safeguards the prophecy’s integrity. 3. Archaeological Verification: External artifacts (coins, stelae, papyri) align perfectly with Daniel’s sequence; no artifact contradicts it. Devotional And Practical Implications • Believers are reminded that God rules international politics; no coalition can stand when He decrees removal. • The murder of the covenant prince prefigures the ultimate Prince of the Covenant, Jesus the Messiah, who was also “cut off” (Daniel 9:26) yet rose again (1 Corinthians 15:3-8), guaranteeing final victory over every tyrant. Conclusion The “flood” in Daniel 11:22 represents the mass of opposing armies and court factions that Antiochus IV Epiphanes effortlessly overwhelmed between 175 and 171 BC, culminating in the death of the legitimate high priest Onias III. The imagery, the historical data, and cohesive manuscript evidence together confirm the prophetic accuracy of Scripture and underscore the invincible sovereignty of Yahweh over human history. |
    |