Why does God allow betrayal if Jesus' fate is predetermined in Luke 22:22? Text and Immediate Context of Luke 22:22 Luke 22:22 : “Indeed, the Son of Man will go as it has been determined, but woe to that man who betrays Him.” The verse sits within the Passover narrative. Jesus has announced both His impending sacrificial death and the presence of a betrayer at the table. This context frames divine determination (“has been determined,” Gk. horismenon) alongside a solemn warning (“woe”), indicating simultaneous divine sovereignty and human accountability. Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility Scripture repeatedly presents God’s exhaustive foreknowledge and predetermining will (Isaiah 46:10; Ephesians 1:11) right beside genuine moral responsibility (Deuteronomy 30:19; Acts 2:23). Betrayal unfolds according to God’s redemptive decree, yet Judas acts freely and is liable for judgment. This is not contradiction but concurrence: God ordains ends and means without coercing volitional agents into moral evil (James 1:13). Prophecy, Foreknowledge, and Predetermination Over a dozen Old Testament texts prefigure the Messiah’s betrayal (e.g., Psalm 41:9; Zechariah 11:12-13). Centuries of manuscript evidence—from the Dead Sea Scrolls (4QPsᵃ) to the Masoretic Text—document these prophecies well before Jesus’ time. God’s foreknowledge is thus not passive observation but active orchestration for salvation history, ensuring that every prophetic detail (John 19:36) is fulfilled without nullifying human choice. The Moral Agency of Judas Judas operated with ordinary cognitive faculties, motives of greed (John 12:6), and satanic influence (Luke 22:3). Nothing in the Gospel accounts suggests he was a puppet. The clause “woe to that man” confirms culpability. Scripture distinguishes between necessity of outcome and compulsion of will; Judas did what he wanted to do (Acts 1:16-25), yet his desire served God’s predetermined plan. Compatibility of Divine Decree and Free Choice Biblical compatibilism is evident in Joseph’s brothers (“You meant evil… God meant it for good,” Genesis 50:20) and in Assyria’s aggression used by God (Isaiah 10:5-7). God can ordain events through freely chosen actions, remaining holy while creatures bear moral responsibility. Betrayal thus advances redemption without implicating God in sin. Purpose of Betrayal in Redemptive History 1. To fulfill written prophecy, authenticating Jesus as Messiah. 2. To expose the depth of human sin that necessitates the cross. 3. To position Jesus for a legal execution under Roman law, securing a public, verifiable death and resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3-8). 4. To model Christ’s response to treachery—manifesting love, forgiveness, and sovereignty (Luke 23:34). Theodicy: God’s Goodness and the Presence of Evil God permits evil temporarily to manifest greater goods: redemption, revelation of divine justice, and ultimate defeat of evil (Revelation 20:10). The cross is the supreme instance; betrayal is the avenue to substitutionary atonement (Isaiah 53:10). God’s allowance of Judas’ sin magnifies grace without compromising holiness. Scriptural Precedents of God Using Sin Sinlessly • Pharaoh’s hardened heart (Exodus 9:12; Romans 9:17) • David’s census (2 Samuel 24:1; 1 Chronicles 21:1) • Crucifixion planned yet enacted by “lawless men” (Acts 2:23) In each case God remains pure (Habakkuk 1:13), while sinners act from evil intent. Betrayal and Messianic Proof The thirty pieces of silver, field of blood, and friend’s treachery align precisely with Zechariah and Psalm prophecies. The early creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3-5—dated within five years of the crucifixion by many scholars—rests on the public reality of these events. Multiple independent attestation (Synoptics, John, Acts) meets the criteria of historical reliability used by mainstream historiography. Psychological and Behavioral Dimensions Betrayal requires proximity. Jesus knowingly chose Judas (John 6:70), demonstrating perfect emotional intelligence and sovereign purpose. Studies on betrayal trauma show victims often question meaning; Scripture answers this existential need by situating betrayal within God’s larger narrative, offering solace and purpose (Romans 8:28). Practical Applications for Believers • Expect trials, including betrayal, as part of discipleship (2 Timothy 3:12). • Trust God’s providence; He weaves human wrongdoing into ultimate good (Romans 8:18). • Extend forgiveness while affirming justice, following Christ’s pattern (1 Peter 2:23). • Guard the heart against small compromises that can culminate in catastrophic sin (John 13:27). Analogous Modern Cases of Providence in Betrayal Mission history records persecutors who, through treachery, inadvertently advanced the gospel. For instance, the 1956 martyrdom of missionaries in Ecuador ultimately led to mass conversions among the Huaorani. These contemporary parallels illustrate God’s ongoing pattern: transforming evil intents into redemptive outcomes. Conclusion God allows betrayal, even when the outcome is divinely predetermined, to fulfill prophecy, display His sovereignty, expose human sin, and secure salvation through Christ’s atoning death and resurrection. Within Scripture’s unified testimony, divine determination and human freedom coexist without contradiction, demonstrating a God who orchestrates history sinlessly while holding moral agents accountable. The betrayal of Jesus thus stands as both a theological necessity and an apologetic cornerstone, confirming the trustworthiness of Scripture and the invincible purpose of God. |
    |