Why does Jesus ask the blind men about their faith in Matthew 9:28? Canonical Setting and Immediate Context Matthew records a rapid series of miracles (9:1-34) that authenticate Jesus as the long-promised Messiah. Just before the episode in question, Jesus raises Jairus’s daughter and heals a woman with an issue of blood. These miracles show dominion over death, disease, and defilement. Verse 27 opens: “As Jesus went on from there, two blind men followed Him, crying out, ‘Have mercy on us, Son of David!’” (Matthew 9:27). Their plea already contains a messianic title (“Son of David”), but Jesus does not heal them immediately. He waits until they have followed Him indoors, then asks, “Do you believe that I am able to do this?” (9:28). Why the Question? A Multifaceted Purpose 1. Eliciting Explicit Faith (Soteriological Focus) Jesus’s question—“Do you believe (pisteuete) that I am able?”—forces personal appropriation of His messianic power. Romans 10:10 says, “For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” The blind men must confess faith before receiving sight, modeling saving faith’s inner assent and outward confession. 2. Pedagogical Demonstration for Onlookers (Discipleship Focus) Indoors, only a smaller audience witnesses the exchange. The disciples are being trained to link faith and divine action (cf. Matthew 17:20). By asking, Jesus turns a private healing into a teaching moment: God’s power is not mechanical; it operates through relational trust. 3. Validating Messianic Identity (Christological Focus) Isaiah 35:5 predicted, “Then the eyes of the blind will be opened.” By prompting the men to affirm His ability, Jesus ties their expectation directly to Himself, identifying as Yahweh’s Servant who fulfills prophecy. 4. Protection Against Superstitious Misinterpretation (Apologetic Focus) First-century Galilee teemed with magical healers. If Jesus healed without referencing faith, observers could ascribe the miracle to technique or talisman. By foregrounding trust in His person, He rules out magical explanations and anchors the event in covenantal faith. 5. Moral Agency and Responsibility (Anthropological Focus) Biblically, humans are not passive objects; they bear responsibility to respond to divine revelation (Joshua 24:15). Jesus honors their agency by asking a question rather than performing an unsolicited act. Faith Precedes Sight: A Consistent Biblical Pattern • Mark 5:34—woman with the hemorrhage: “Your faith has healed you.” • Luke 17:19—ten lepers: only the thankful Samaritan hears, “Your faith has made you well.” • Acts 14:9—Paul heals a lame man after “seeing that he had faith to be healed.” The pattern underscores Hebrews 11:6: “Without faith it is impossible to please God.” Miracles serve theological, not merely therapeutic, ends. Contrast with Unbelief Immediately after (Matthew 9:32-34) Pharisees attribute another miracle to demonic power. The narrative contrast shows that identical evidence hardens the unbelieving and softens the believing, fulfilling Isaiah 6:9-10. Spiritual Vision Versus Physical Sight John 9 expands the motif: physical healing illustrates spiritual illumination. By asking about faith first, Jesus signals that sight without spiritual insight is insufficient. Revelation 3:18 urges the church to acquire “salve to anoint your eyes so that you may see.” Fulfillment of Covenant Motifs Blindness signified covenant curses (Deuteronomy 28:28-29). Messiah reverses the curse. The required faith mirrors Abraham’s: “He did not waver through unbelief regarding the promise of God” (Romans 4:20). Thus, the blind men reenact covenant restoration. Contemporary Application 1. Faith must be personal: inherited religion is inadequate. 2. Confession matters: silent assent is completed by verbal acknowledgment. 3. Prayer should articulate trust in God’s ability, not merely His willingness. 4. Evangelism should probe belief gently yet directly, following Jesus’s model. Conclusion Jesus asks the blind men about their faith to draw out a clear confession, instruct His disciples, authenticate His messianic role, safeguard the miracle from magical misinterpretation, and engage the men’s moral agency. The question weaves soteriology, Christology, and pedagogy into a single moment, demonstrating that divine power is mediated through personal trust in the Son of David—faith that still opens blind eyes, spiritual and physical, today. |
    |