Why did the crowds in Matthew 21:11 call Jesus a prophet instead of the Messiah? Second-Temple Expectations of Messiah First-century Jews anticipated multiple eschatological figures—Davidic King (2 Samuel 7; Psalm 2), Priestly Messiah (Psalm 110; Zechariah 6:12-13), and the “Prophet like Moses” (Deuteronomy 18:15-18). Qumran documents (e.g., 1QS 9.11) even list two Messiahs. Many pilgrims therefore did not equate “prophet” with “not-Messiah”; rather, they often saw the prophetic office as a component of messianic ministry. The Honorific Weight of “Prophet” Calling Jesus “the prophet” (ὁ προφήτης) echoes John 6:14: “Surely this is the Prophet who is to come into the world” . The definite article signals the Deuteronomy 18 promise. In common parlance, however, “Messiah” (Χριστός) had strong political overtones that could trigger Roman crackdowns (cf. Acts 5:36-37). Crowds entering a fortified city under heavy Roman surveillance may have chosen a safer, yet still exalted, label. Gradual Revelation and Messianic Secret Jesus often directed people not to broadcast His identity prematurely (Matthew 16:20; Mark 1:44). His timing focused on Passover, when His sacrificial role would be unmistakable. Public opinion, therefore, lagged behind private confessions (Matthew 16:16). Crowds recognized extraordinary authority but had not integrated prophecy of a suffering, atoning Messiah (Isaiah 53) with the triumphant Son of David imagery. Prophetic Actions Matching Prophetic Title • Entry on a colt fulfilled Zechariah 9:9—an act Israel associated with prophetic symbolism. • Cleansing the Temple (Matthew 21:12-13) mirrored Jeremiah 7 and Malachi 3:1-3, prophetic oracles of purifying judgment. • Miraculous healings in the Temple courts (21:14) echoed Elijah/Elisha patterns (1 Kings 17; 2 Kings 5). Thus the crowd used the most obvious category their experience supplied: prophet. Sociopolitical Realities of Roman Judea Roman authorities executed would-be Messiahs (cf. Josephus, Antiquities 20.97-99). Pilgrims from Galilee—Jesus’ primary base—were already suspect. Labeling Him “prophet” allowed enthusiastic acclamation without immediate political indictment, while still appealing to national hope (Luke 24:19-21). Theological Unity: Prophet, Priest, and King Hebrews 1:1-3 unites these offices in Christ. Matthew purposely records every title uttered—Son of David, Prophet, Lord—to show their convergence in Jesus’ passion and resurrection. The crowd’s partial confession fits the progressive unveiling of redemptive history; full comprehension arrives when the risen Christ declares, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me” (Matthew 28:18). Historical Reliability Supporting the Account Early creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 (dated within five years of the Resurrection) confirms the apostolic proclamation of Jesus as crucified and risen Messiah. Over 5,800 Greek NT manuscripts display textual stability—Matthew 21 reads identically in 4th-century Codex Vaticanus and 2nd-century papyri (P⁷⁷). Archaeological digs at first-century Nazareth (e.g., the 2009 discovery of a domestic complex) corroborate a modest Galilean origin, matching the crowd’s description. Conclusion: From Prophetic Recognition to Messianic Faith The Jerusalem pilgrims rightly perceived Jesus as God’s prophetic spokesman but had not yet embraced the fuller revelation of His royal and priestly messiahship. The Resurrection, attested by hundreds of eyewitnesses (1 Corinthians 15:6) and validated by an empty tomb acknowledged even by hostile sources (Matthew 28:11-15), completed the picture. What began on Palm Sunday as “the prophet from Nazareth” culminated on Resurrection Sunday with Thomas’s confession, “My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28). |
    |