Why did the daughters of Reuel describe Moses as an Egyptian in Exodus 2:19? Full Text of the Passage “So they replied, ‘An Egyptian rescued us from the shepherds. He even drew water for us and watered the flock.’ ” (Exodus 2:19) Immediate Narrative Context Moses, having fled Egypt after slaying an Egyptian taskmaster (Exodus 2:11-15), arrived in Midian, sat by a well, and defended Reuel’s seven daughters from harassing shepherds (vv. 16-17). When the daughters returned home they described their benefactor to their father, identifying him as “an Egyptian.” The description is made prior to any formal introduction; Moses’ personal name is not yet known to them (v. 18). Cultural and Visual Markers 1. Clothing and Grooming. Archaeological reliefs from the Eighteenth Dynasty depict Egyptian males with clean-shaven faces or trimmed goatees, kohl-lined eyes, and linen garments distinct in cut and color from Midianite or Semitic shepherd attire. Raised in Pharaoh’s court (Acts 7:21-22), Moses would naturally have adopted court dress. Linen, cosmetics, and the distinctive shaved head or braided sidelock would have provided an immediate visual cue. 2. Accoutrements. The cobra-headed uraeus or simple reed-woven staff common to Egyptian nobility, along with jewelry of electrum or faience, differentiated Egyptians from nomads clad in wool or goat-hair. Even a single pectoral or signet ring would have signaled Egyptian status. 3. Physical Bearing and Training. Acts 7:22 states that “Moses was educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians and was powerful in speech and action.” Military and administrative training produced a confidence that contrasted sharply with Midian’s pastoral lifestyle, explaining why he single-handedly dispersed multiple shepherds. Social and Geographical Assumptions Midian sat along trade routes linking Egypt with the Arabian Peninsula. Egyptians, whether soldiers escorting turquoise miners to Serabit el-Khadem or traders moving through Elath, were a familiar but transient presence. A lone, capable man traveling east out of Egypt naturally fit the profile. Theological Rationale: Providence in Identity 1. Bridge Between Cultures. Moses’ Egyptian upbringing equipped him to confront Pharaoh intelligibly (Exodus 5:1) while still belonging to Israel by birth (Exodus 2:1-2). 2. Foreshadowing Redemption. Typologically, an Israelite “appearing” as a foreigner who rescues the oppressed prefigures Christ, “in appearance as a man” (Philippians 2:7), yet divine. 3. Humiliation and Exile. Being mislabeled fulfilled God’s refining process. Hebrews 11:24-27 notes Moses’ deliberate choice to “be mistreated with the people of God,” a decision reinforced each time his worldly status was misunderstood. Practical Lessons and Applications 1. Don’t underestimate providential skill sets. Backgrounds seemingly alien to God’s people can become indispensable tools for deliverance. 2. Outward appearances influence witness. Moses’ later humility (Numbers 12:3) contrasts with his princely exterior here, reminding believers that identity rests in covenant, not cosmetics. 3. Expect misidentification. Followers of God may face misunderstanding in secular contexts; integrity in action, as Moses displayed, clarifies true allegiance over time. Harmony with the Rest of Scripture Later, Zipporah calls Moses a “bridegroom of blood” (Exodus 4:25-26), indicating she came to see beyond his Egyptian façade. Similarly, Joseph’s brothers failed to recognize him in Egyptian regalia (Genesis 42:8). Both narratives underscore how God conceals and reveals identity for redemptive ends. Conclusion Reuel’s daughters called Moses “an Egyptian” because every observable marker—dress, speech, bearing, and context—signaled Egypt. God sovereignly orchestrated this perception to foreshadow Moses’ mediatorial role, to bridge two cultures, and to advance the redemptive storyline culminating in Christ. |
    |