Why did Jesus choose Judas as a disciple if He knew he would betray Him? Divine Sovereignty and Foreknowledge Jesus’ deliberate wording, “Did I not choose you,” places the initiative squarely in His hands. Scripture affirms that the Son shares omniscience with the Father (John 2:25; 16:30), so His knowledge of Judas’ future treachery was complete at the moment of selection. The episode underscores that nothing in the Passion narrative is accidental; God’s redemptive plan operates through human agents—willing or unwilling—without compromising divine righteousness (Acts 2:23). Fulfillment of Messianic Prophecy 1 000 years earlier David lamented, “Even my close friend in whom I trusted, who ate my bread, has lifted up his heel against me.” (Psalm 41:9). The Dead Sea Scrolls (4QPs a) preserve this verse, demonstrating its pre-Christian provenance. Zechariah foretold the precise betrayal price and its disposal in the temple (Zechariah 11:12-13), fulfilled in Matthew 27:3-10. Jesus Himself cites Psalm 41:9 at the Last Supper (John 13:18) to show that Judas’ betrayal authenticates, rather than nullifies, His messianic credentials (Luke 24:44). Instrument of the Atoning Mission Without the betrayal, the chain of events leading to the crucifixion in Jerusalem might have unfolded differently; prophetic necessity required a proximate cause inside the apostolic band. Judas’ act sets in motion the arrest (John 18:2-3), trial, and crucifixion—events by which “Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures” (1 Corinthians 15:3). Divine providence employs human evil to accomplish salvific good, paralleling Joseph’s assessment of his brothers’ treachery: “You intended evil against me, but God intended it for good” (Genesis 50:20). Exposition of Human Freedom and Responsibility Though foreknown and foreordained, Judas acts voluntarily. Jesus warns him repeatedly (John 13:10-11, 21-27); nonetheless, Judas “fell away by transgression” (Acts 1:25). Scripture holds him morally accountable (Matthew 26:24). This conjunction of sovereignty and responsibility rebuts fatalism while affirming God’s exhaustive knowledge. Demonstration of Christ’s Omnipotent Love For three years Judas witnessed miracles, heard unparallelled teaching, and enjoyed intimate fellowship. Christ washed Judas’ feet (John 13:5) and offered him the dipped morsel of honor (13:26). These gestures reveal a Savior who extends grace to the very end, illustrating that rejection of Christ is not due to lack of evidence or opportunity but a hardened heart (Hebrews 3:12-13). Pedagogical Contrast for Disciples and Readers Judas embodies the peril of external religiosity devoid of genuine faith. His presence among the Twelve contrasts with faithful discipleship, sharpening lessons on hypocrisy, greed (John 12:6), and the love of money (1 Timothy 6:10). The church throughout history has used Judas as a cautionary archetype against apostasy (Hebrews 10:26-31). Pastoral and Missional Implications Believers gain assurance that betrayal, persecution, or institutional hypocrisy cannot thwart divine purposes. Evangelistically, Judas’ tragedy invites self-examination (2 Corinthians 13:5) and urgency: proximity to truth without surrender is perilous. Christ’s perfect foreknowledge coupled with open invitation models how to engage skeptics—offering evidence, relationship, and warning. Conclusion Jesus chose Judas to fulfill prophecy, advance the atoning plan, reveal divine foreknowledge, illustrate the coexistence of sovereignty and human freedom, warn against apostasy, and authenticate Scriptural reliability. The tragedy of Judas ultimately magnifies God’s glory and the sufficiency of the risen Christ, “delivered over by God’s set plan and foreknowledge” yet triumphed in resurrection for the salvation of all who believe (Acts 2:23-24). |
    |