Why did Abimelech attack the tower in Judges 9:52? Canonical Passage (Judges 9:50–52) “Then Abimelech went to Thebez and encamped against it and captured it. But there was a strong tower in the city, and all the men and women and all the leaders of the city fled there and locked themselves in; they went up to the roof of the tower. Abimelech came to attack the tower and approached the entrance to set it on fire.” Immediate Literary Setting Abimelech, an illegitimate son of Gideon (Jerub-Baal), had murdered seventy of his half-brothers at Ophrah, usurped power in Shechem, and ruled as a tyrant for three years. God “sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the leaders of Shechem” (Judges 9:23) as judgment for the blood he had shed, fulfilling Jotham’s prophetic curse (9:19-20). After razing Shechem and sowing it with salt, Abimelech destroyed the tower of Shechem by burning it with those who had sought refuge inside (9:46-49). He then marched on the nearby town of Thebez, where the remnant of resistance barricaded themselves inside another tower. Verse 52 records his attempt to repeat the fiery tactic that had just succeeded. Character and Motives of Abimelech 1. Blood-guilt and Vengeance: Having silenced Shechem, Abimelech sought to eradicate any remaining opposition in the region to preserve his self-made kingship. The leaders of Thebez were likely Shechemite allies (or sympathetic), making them targets of his vendetta. 2. Pride and Hubris: His earlier triumph at Shechem inflated his confidence. Psalm 10:4 describes the proud who “do not seek God; all his schemes are vile.” Abimelech embodies this arrogance, trusting in violent means rather than repentance. 3. Fear of Insurrection: Ancient city-state politics demanded decisive suppression of rebellion. Any surviving dissenters inside Thebez’s tower posed a psychological and strategic threat to his fragile authority. Strategic and Military Considerations • Ancient Near Eastern towers (“migdal,” מִגְדָּל) were multi-story fortifications within or attached to city walls, serving as final refuges when outer defenses collapsed. Archaeology at sites such as Tel Balata (biblical Shechem) and Tel es-Sultan (Jericho) has uncovered such towers. • Standard siege procedure involved surrounding the tower, breaching its door, or burning the base. Wood-reinforced gates and lower levels made fire an expedient method (cf. 2 Kings 25:9; Amos 1:7). • Abimelech’s choice to ignite the door mirrors his destruction of the earlier tower (Judges 9:49). Military pragmatism—repeat what works—coupled with urgency drove him to press close, ignoring personal risk. Covenantal Judgment and Divine Retribution Deuteronomy 27:25 pronounces a curse on “anyone who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person.” Abimelech’s kingship began with hired assassins and bloodshed (Judges 9:4-5). The narrative intentionally shows God’s providence: the very tactic by which Abimelech had incinerated Shechem becomes the setting for his death—“a woman dropped an upper millstone on Abimelech’s head and crushed his skull” (9:53). Thus Yahweh’s justice is poetic, exact, and timely. Archaeological and Historical Corroboration • At Tel Balata, strata dated to Iron IA (c. 1200–1100 BC, aligning with a conservative Ussher-style chronology) reveal a massive tower-like structure with charred remains, indicating destruction by fire, consistent with Judges 9. • Professor Yigael Yadin’s analysis of Late Bronze and Early Iron Age siege warfare notes frequent gate burnings in Canaanite cities, lending external plausibility to the biblical description. • The modern identification of Thebez with Khirbet Tubas—situated roughly ten miles northeast of Shechem—shows elevated terrain conducive to a central tower dominating a small settlement. Theological and Moral Lessons 1. Sow Blood, Reap Blood: Galatians 6:7—“God is not mocked. For whatever a man sows, he will reap.” 2. False Security vs. True Refuge: Isaiah 28:17 warns that relying on lies will result in a sweeping away of refuge; only the Lord is a sure foundation (28:16). 3. Divine Sovereignty in Human Affairs: Even the sinful motives of tyrants advance God’s righteous purposes (Proverbs 21:1). Practical Application • Leaders who grasp power unlawfully invite ruin; integrity preserves (Proverbs 10:9). • Pride blinds to imminent danger; humble dependence on God averts self-destruction. • God’s judgment can arise from ordinary events—a dropped millstone—underscoring His control over the minutiae of life. Conclusion Abimelech attacked the tower at Thebez to obliterate the last pocket of opposition, secure his precarious throne, and replicate his earlier success at Shechem. His aggression sprang from pride, paranoia, and a violent disposition shaped by prior blood-guilt. Strategically, burning the gate was a common, efficient siege technique. Theologically, the episode illustrates God’s retributive justice: the flame Abimelech intended for others became the setting for his own downfall, validating Scripture’s consistent testimony that “those who live by the sword will die by the sword” (cf. Matthew 26:52). |
    |