Why did Israel want a king to lead them?
Why did Israel desire a king "to lead us and go before us"?

Setting the Scene

• Samuel, Israel’s final judge, had grown old and appointed his sons as judges, but “his sons did not walk in his ways” (1 Samuel 8:3).

• The elders gathered and said, “Now appoint a king to judge us like all the other nations” (v. 5).

• Despite Samuel’s warning, “the people refused to listen… ‘No,’ they said. ‘We must have a king over us. Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to judge us, to lead us, and to go out before us and fight our battles’” (vv. 19-20).


What They Wanted on the Surface

• A recognizable, centralized leader—“like all the other nations.”

• A visible commander “to go out before us” in battle.

• A figurehead to unify the tribes and settle disputes.

• Relief from the instability and corruption they had seen in Samuel’s sons.


Deeper Motivations Beneath the Surface

• Replacing faith with sight

– For years “the LORD went before them… in a pillar of cloud by day and in a pillar of fire by night” (Exodus 13:21).

– Now they preferred a flesh-and-blood king they could see.

• Fear of external threats

– Philistine aggression loomed large (1 Samuel 7:7-13), so they sought military security in human leadership.

• A longing for cultural conformity

– They envied the orderly monarchies around them, forgetting their unique calling (Exodus 19:5-6).

• Weariness with cyclical chaos

– Judges closes with, “In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25). A monarch seemed the cure.


God’s Diagnosis

• “They have not rejected you, but they have rejected Me as their king” (1 Samuel 8:7).

• Their request had been anticipated: “When you enter the land… and you say, ‘Let us set a king over us like all the nations around us,’ you are certainly to appoint over you the king the LORD your God chooses” (Deuteronomy 17:14-15).

• God conceded, yet warned of the king’s burdens (1 Samuel 8:11-18). Their insistence exposed misplaced trust.


Spiritual Implications

• Trading theocracy for monarchy marked a step away from direct dependence on the Lord.

• The desire for a human savior mirrored humanity’s broader tendency to “trust in chariots and in horses” rather than “the name of the LORD our God” (Psalm 20:7).

• Though God permitted their choice, He remained sovereign, ultimately steering history toward the anointed King of kings (2 Samuel 7:12-16; Luke 1:32-33).


Lessons for Today

• Visible solutions often feel safer than unseen reliance on God, yet only the Lord truly “goes before you” (Deuteronomy 31:8).

• Cultural pressure to conform can erode distinctiveness; believers are called to be “a peculiar people” (1 Peter 2:9).

• Leadership is God’s gift, but never a substitute for His kingship. Christ alone satisfies the longing for a leader who judges righteously, unites perfectly, and fights victoriously on our behalf (Revelation 19:11-16).

What is the meaning of 1 Samuel 8:20?
Top of Page
Top of Page