Why did Joseph's brothers take his robe?
Why did Joseph's brothers strip him of his robe in Genesis 37:23?

Text Of Genesis 37:23

“So Joseph came to his brothers, and they stripped him of his robe—the robe of many colors he was wearing.”


Narrative Context

Joseph has just been sent by Jacob to check on his brothers in Shechem and then Dothan (Genesis 37:12–17). The brothers already “hated him even more” (37:5) because of his two prophetic dreams (37:5–11) and because “his father loved him more than all his other sons and made him a robe of many colors” (37:3). Their hostility culminates when they see Joseph approaching alone across open country; before a word is exchanged they conspire, “Come, let us kill him” (37:20). The first physical act of that conspiracy is the forcible removal of the robe.


Cultural Significance Of The Robe

1. Status Garment. Archaeological textile fragments from the 19th–18th century BC tombs at Beni Hasan (Middle Egypt) show long-sleeved, multicolored tunics worn by Semitic traders (see J. Garstang, “Burial Customs of the Middle Kingdom,” Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 18). Such a garment denoted rank and exemption from manual labor.

2. Inheritance Marker. In patriarchal practice, the ketonet passim (long robe) could visually mark the son designated as primary heir or family representative. Stripping the robe symbolically annulled that status.

3. Honor-Shame Dynamic. In the Ancient Near East, clothing was an extension of personal honor (cf. 2 Samuel 13:19; Esther 6:11). Publicly disrobing a person was tantamount to social dismemberment.


Psychological And Moral Motives

Jealousy had fermented into rage (Genesis 37:11). Modern behavioral analysis of “relative deprivation” (Ted Gurr, Why Men Rebel) shows that perceived favoritism magnifies sibling hostility. The robe embodied Jacob’s partiality; the brothers lashed out at the symbol to wound both Joseph and their father simultaneously. By stripping Joseph first, they vented anger while postponing final decisions (murder? slavery?)—a pattern consistent with escalation theory in aggression studies.


Legal And Social Dimension: Birthright Conflict

Reuben, as firstborn of Leah, had forfeited privilege by his sin with Bilhah (35:22). Jacob’s open preference for Rachel’s firstborn threatened the remaining brothers’ claims. Removing the robe aimed to erase Joseph’s legal claim to the double portion (Deuteronomy 21:17 describes this right later codified). Their act is tantamount to a hostile “disinheritance.”


Theological Symbolism

1. Covenant Preservation. God’s promise to Abraham required a preserved lineage (Genesis 15:5–18). Satanic opposition often surfaces through fraternal strife (cf. Cain and Abel).

2. Foreshadowing of Substitution. Joseph’s robe, drenched in goat’s blood (37:31), prefigures substitutionary imagery later fulfilled in Christ: a beloved son, stripped and presumed dead, yet raised to bring deliverance (cf. Luke 24:26).

3. Sovereignty in Suffering. Psalm 105:17–19 interprets Joseph’s suffering as Yahweh’s refining instrument: “He sent a man before them—Joseph, sold as a slave… the word of the LORD tested him.”


Typological Parallel To Christ

• Stripped of Garments: Joseph—Genesis 37:23; Jesus—Matthew 27:28.

• Betrayed by Own Brethren: Joseph by ten brothers; Jesus by Israel’s leaders (John 1:11).

• Sold for Silver: Joseph for 20 shekels (Genesis 37:28); Jesus for 30 pieces (Matthew 26:15).

• Became Savior: Joseph preserves life during famine (Genesis 45:5–7); Jesus grants eternal life (John 3:16).

Thus the stripping scene is a divinely orchestrated preview of redemptive history.


Archaeological And Historical Corroboration

Excavations in the eastern Nile Delta (Tell el-Dab‘a) reveal a Semitic administrative district in the Middle Bronze Age featuring a “house of twelve pillars” and a tomb with a multicolored statue fragment (Manfred Bietak, Avaris: The Capital of the Hyksos). Though not definitive, the synchronism of a Semitic official honored with a colored garment aligns with the Joseph account’s cultural backdrop.


Practical Application

• Guard the Heart: “Wrath is cruel and anger is a torrent, but who can withstand jealousy?” (Proverbs 27:4)

• Reject Symbols of Partiality: Parents and leaders must avoid favoritism that provokes sin (Ephesians 6:4).

• See God’s Hand in Hardship: What appears as malicious stripping can become the staging ground for providence (Romans 8:28).


Conclusion

Joseph’s brothers removed his robe to erase his privileged status, appease their jealousy, signal his disinheritance, and embolden their conspiracy. God, foreknowing their motives, wove that very act into a larger tapestry that would exalt Joseph and ultimately foreshadow the humiliation and exaltation of Christ. Their sin became the stage for salvation.

What steps can we take to promote family unity, avoiding actions like Genesis 37:23?
Top of Page
Top of Page