Why did Judas Iscariot care about the money in John 12:6? Canonical Text and Immediate Context “Then one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, who was going to betray Him, asked, ‘Why wasn’t this perfume sold for three hundred denarii and the money given to the poor?’ He said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief; as keeper of the money bag, he used to take from what was put into it.” (John 12:4-6) A Trusted Position Abused The Greek term for “money bag” (γλωσσόκομον, glōssokomon) denotes a portable strongbox for valuable gifts. First-century ossuaries and household lockboxes unearthed at Jerusalem’s Herodian Quarter display similar wood-inlaid recesses, corroborating the Gospel’s ordinary detail. Entrusting Judas with this bag highlights the Lord’s deliberate placement of each disciple; yet Judas, fallen by covetousness, exploited that trust. Greed as Idolatry Scripture repeatedly ties the lust for wealth to spiritual ruin: • “The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil” (1 Timothy 6:10). • “You cannot serve both God and money” (Matthew 6:24). Judas’ protest in John 12 masks self-interest with pious rhetoric. His behavior illustrates Proverbs 26:23: “Like a glaze covering an earthen vessel are burning lips with an evil heart.” Pattern of Thievery Prior to Betrayal John uses the imperfect tense (“used to take”), indicating an ongoing habit. The Fourth Gospel, preserved in P66 (c. AD 200) and P75 (early 3rd century), contains this clause unvaried, underscoring its authenticity. Judas’ petty embezzlement foreshadowed the climactic betrayal for “thirty pieces of silver” (Matthew 26:14-15)–the slave’s compensation in Exodus 21:32 and the Messianic figure price in Zechariah 11:12-13. Satanic Incitement within Human Choice Luke 22:3 records, “Then Satan entered Judas called Iscariot,” yet Acts 1:18 notes, “With the reward of his wickedness Judas bought a field.” Divine sovereignty and genuine human agency intertwine: Judas willingly nurtured greed, and the adversary exploited that opening. Behavioral research confirms that repeated small norm violations desensitize the conscience, setting the stage for greater transgressions—a psychological arc the Gospels capture theologically. Contrast with Mary’s Worship Mary of Bethany’s costly nard (≈ 300 denarii, nearly a laborer’s annual wage) epitomized sacrificial devotion. Judas appraised only monetary value, ignoring the intrinsic worth of honoring the incarnate Son of God. Jesus replies, “Leave her alone; she has kept this perfume for the day of My burial” (John 12:7), teaching that worship supersedes utilitarian calculations when directed toward the Creator. Fulfillment of Messianic Prophecy Zechariah’s oracle names silver’s contemptuous valuation of the Shepherd. By fixating on money, Judas unwittingly aligns with prophetic foretelling while Mary’s anointing anticipates the Messiah’s burial, weaving Old Testament expectation into New Testament realization—an integrated testimony attested by the Dead Sea Scrolls (4QXIIa) containing Zechariah with the same silver-price pericope. Moral and Pastoral Implications 1. Guard the heart against incremental compromise (Proverbs 4:23). 2. Generosity toward Christ and the needy is evidence of regeneration (2 Corinthians 8-9). 3. Religious language can cloak greed; test motives under Scripture’s light (Hebrews 4:12). 4. Only repentance and faith in the risen Jesus deliver from the domino effect of sin that ensnared Judas (Romans 10:9). Eschatological Sobriety Acts 1:25 states Judas turned “to go to his own place.” His concern for the money bag exposed a deeper disbelief in Christ’s kingdom. Modern archaeological confirmation of first-century burial fields (Akeldama) validates the historical framework while warning every generation: temporal gain apart from Christ ends in eternal loss (Mark 8:36). Conclusion Judas cared about the money in John 12:6 because unchecked covetousness had dethroned his professed allegiance to Christ, opening him to Satan’s influence and fulfilling ancient prophecy. His life exemplifies the peril of valuing material wealth over the incarnate Lord, whereas Mary’s lavish gift models the chief end of humanity—to glorify God through wholehearted devotion to Jesus, the risen Messiah and only Savior. |
    |