Why did Manasseh get more land?
Why was the tribe of Manasseh given additional land in Joshua 17:5?

Canonical Text

“Thus ten shares fell to Manasseh, in addition to the land of Gilead and Bashan beyond the Jordan” (Joshua 17:5).


Immediate Literary Context

Joshua 17 records the western allotment of land to the descendants of Manasseh, Joseph’s firstborn. Verses 3–6 detail a legal petition by Zelophehad’s daughters, reminding Joshua of Moses’ judgment that they were to inherit alongside male relatives (cf. Numbers 27:1-11; 36:1-12). Verse 5 summarizes the effect: Manasseh received ten “cords” (ḥăbālîm, measured portions) west of the Jordan in addition to territory already held east of the river (Gilead and Bashan, assigned in Numbers 32:33-42).


Legal Background: The Precedent of Zelophehad’s Daughters

Moses, by divine revelation, ruled that daughters could inherit if no sons existed (Numbers 27). This ruling:

1. Preserved tribal boundaries by keeping property inside the clan (Numbers 36:6-9).

2. Demonstrated covenantal equity within patriarchal structures—God’s justice accommodates every covenant member.

3. Became statutory law, confirmed by Joshua (Joshua 17:4).

Because Zelophehad had five daughters and no sons, Manasseh would have lost a portion of its land were their claim denied. Their successful petition produced five additional shares. Together with the standard five male-assigned portions, the total became ten.


The Double Portion Principle for Joseph

Jacob adopted Ephraim and Manasseh as full tribal heirs (Genesis 48:5-22). By doing so, Joseph received a “double portion” normally reserved for the firstborn (Deuteronomy 21:17). Practically, this meant:

• Twelve landed tribes still occupied Canaan, even though Levi received no contiguous territory (Joshua 13:14).

• Joseph’s patrimony was expressed through two tribes, Ephraim and Manasseh, whose combined allocation is the largest in Israel.

Manasseh’s extra land west of the Jordan balances Ephraim’s compact but fertile parcel and safeguards the proportional inheritance owed to Joseph.


Population and Military Strength

Numbers 26:29-34 lists Manasseh’s census at 52,700 fighting men—third greatest among tribes. A larger allotment west of the Jordan answered practical needs for settlement, agriculture, and defense, matching population demographics recorded in the historical census.


Geographical and Strategic Considerations

East Manasseh occupied the high plateaus of Gilead and Bashan—ideal for livestock. West Manasseh’s ten tracts stretched from the Jordan Valley up to the Mediterranean coast, including:

• Fertile Jezreel Valley for grain.

• Key north-south arteries linking Galilee to Samaria.

• Hill-country fortresses overlooking trade routes, granting Manasseh strategic parity with Ephraim’s hill country (Joshua 17:7-11).


Archaeological Corroboration

• Iron Age I village networks in the Manasseh hill country display four-room houses and collared-rim storage jars identical to Judean sites, affirming a united Israelite material culture (cf. Amihai Mazar, Archaeology of the Land of the Bible, Vol. 1).

• Excavations at Tel Jezreel and Megiddo (within Manassite borders) reveal continuous occupation layers from Late Bronze to Iron Age, consistent with early Israelite settlement waves recorded in Joshua and Judges.

• Mount Gerizim inscriptions (4th c. B.C.) preserve Samaritan veneration of Joshua’s altar site in nearby Mount Ebal (Joshua 8:30-35), anchoring the allotment narrative in enduring regional memory.


Covenantal Theology

1. Promise Fulfilled: The expansion illustrates God’s faithfulness to patriarchal promises (Genesis 15:18-21), delivering tangible land.

2. Justice Manifested: The case of Zelophehad’s daughters reveals divine concern for individual rights within communal structures, foreshadowing the Gospel principle that “there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28).

3. Typology of Inheritance: Manasseh’s dual territory mirrors the Christian’s dual citizenship—presently resident “east of Jordan” (earthly life) yet promised fuller possession in the “west” (resurrection life), grounded in Christ’s victory (Hebrews 4:8-11).


Practical Discipleship Lessons

• Bold Petitioning: Like Zelophehad’s daughters, believers may approach God’s throne confidently (Hebrews 4:16).

• Stewardship: Manasseh’s enlarged borders entailed greater responsibility to drive out Canaanite strongholds (Joshua 17:12-13), reminding Christians that increased blessing demands faithful obedience.

• Unity Amid Diversity: The equitable redistribution prevented tribal jealousy, encouraging the body of Christ to honor different gifts while maintaining one mission (1 Corinthians 12:4-27).


Summary

Manasseh received additional land in Joshua 17:5 because: (1) Moses’ legally binding decision granted Zelophehad’s daughters their father’s share; (2) Joseph’s divinely ordained double portion necessitated proportional territory; (3) demographic strength required more space; and (4) strategic geography served Israel’s collective security. The episode underscores God’s faithfulness, justice, and redemptive purpose—truths ultimately perfected in the risen Christ, the heir of all things (Hebrews 1:2).

What historical evidence supports the land allotment described in Joshua 17:5?
Top of Page
Top of Page