Why did Saul swear an oath to the medium in 1 Samuel 28:10? Historical Setting and Saul’s Spiritual Decline After Samuel’s death and the advancing Philistine threat (1 Samuel 28:3–5), Saul found himself isolated from prophetic counsel because “the LORD did not answer him, either by dreams or Urim or prophets” (1 Samuel 28:6). His prior disobedience (1 Samuel 13; 15) and his purge of mediums (28:3) had severed normal channels of guidance. The king who once “was little in his own eyes” (cf. 1 Samuel 15:17) had hardened his heart; the silence of God drove him to the very practices he had outlawed. The Cultural and Legal Weight of an Oath In ancient Israel an oath sworn “by the LORD” invoked Yahweh as witness and guarantor (Genesis 14:22–23; Judges 11:30–31). Such vows carried covenantal gravity; perjury meant divine judgment (Leviticus 19:12). Saul’s formula—“As surely as the LORD lives” (1 Samuel 28:10)—is the strongest Hebrew adjuration (ḥay-YHWH). Even a medium knew the risk: necromancy was a capital offense (Leviticus 20:27; Deuteronomy 18:10–12). Without a royal promise she would likely refuse. Thus Saul leverages sacred custom to secure illicit cooperation. Why Swear at All? Three Converging Motives 1. Political authority: The woman feared the king’s own decree (1 Samuel 28:3). Saul must override his previous policy to gain her trust. 2. Practical desperation: Facing annihilation, he treats divine law pragmatically, valuing immediate intel over righteousness (Proverbs 14:12). 3. Psychological self-deception: By couching his sin in formal piety, Saul masks rebellion with religiosity—an early form of what behavioral science labels “moral licensing.” The Irony and Hypocrisy of Invoking Yahweh Saul’s words weaponize God’s covenant name in direct breach of the covenant law. He simultaneously acknowledges Yahweh’s living reality while rejecting Yahweh’s revealed will. Scripture often highlights such dissonance to expose the folly of external religion without obedience (Isaiah 29:13; Matthew 15:8). Archaeological and Cultural Parallels Excavations at Tel-Qeṣīla and En-Dor reveal Late Bronze–Iron Age cultic installations with necromantic paraphernalia—clay pits and ancestor figurines—paralleling practices condemned in Deuteronomy. These finds corroborate the biblical milieu in which mediums operated clandestinely yet pervasively. Theological Ramifications 1. Covenant Broken: Swearing by Yahweh while contravening His law illustrates covenant infidelity, a theme culminating in Saul’s death (1 Chronicles 10:13–14). 2. Prophetic Validation: Samuel’s post-mortem judgment (28:16–19) comes true, authenticating prophetic authority and foreshadowing the Messianic resurrection, God’s ultimate demonstration of power over death (Acts 13:34–37). 3. Typological Warning: Saul prefigures all who seek spiritual truth apart from God’s ordained means, underscoring Christ’s exclusive mediatorship (1 Timothy 2:5). Practical Lessons • Sacred language does not sanctify sinful choices. • Desperation exposes true allegiance; trials reveal the heart more than words. • God’s silence calls for repentance, not alternative spirituality. Answer Summarized Saul swore an oath to the medium to guarantee her safety, manipulate her cooperation, and obtain forbidden revelation, all while cloaking his rebellion in the authoritative language of a divine vow. The act reveals his spiritual bankruptcy, legal hypocrisy, and psychological desperation, and serves as a sober biblical warning that invoking God’s name without obeying God’s word invites judgment rather than help. |
    |