Why did Saul attempt to kill Jonathan with a spear in 1 Samuel 20:33? Chronological and Cultural Background Saul’s attempt on Jonathan’s life occurs c. 1011 BC, during the last decade of Saul’s forty-year reign (cf. Acts 13:21). Saul, Israel’s first king, had been anointed (1 Samuel 10) yet subsequently rejected by God for disobedience (15:23). By the time of 1 Samuel 20 the Philistine threat is intensifying (19:8), David’s popularity is soaring (18:7), and the kingdom’s stability appears to Saul to depend on eliminating David. Narrative Flow Leading Up to the Incident • 1 Samuel 18:7–9 – David’s military success and the women’s song ignite Saul’s jealousy. • 18:10–11 – Saul twice hurls a spear at David. • 19:1 – Saul commands Jonathan and servants to kill David; Jonathan persuades him otherwise. • 19:11–24 – Saul’s renewed plots fail, culminating in prophetic incapacitation at Naioth. • 20:1–29 – David and Jonathan devise a test at the New Moon festival to expose Saul’s intent. At the festival Saul notices David’s absence, questions it, and then explodes when Jonathan defends David. Immediate Text: 1 Samuel 20:30–33 “Then Saul’s anger burned against Jonathan, and he said to him, ‘You son of a perverse and rebellious woman! … For as long as the son of Jesse lives on the earth, neither you nor your kingdom will be established. …’ … Then Saul hurled his spear at Jonathan to kill him.” Saul’s Spiritual and Psychological Condition 1. Divine Rejection: “The Spirit of the LORD had departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD tormented him” (16:14). Repeated disobedience (13:13–14; 15:19–23) left Saul without divine guidance. 2. Jealousy and Paranoia: Saul “eyed David from that day on” (18:9). Modern behavioral science labels the pattern as persecutory delusion triggered by perceived loss of status—a dynamic still observed in leaders under stress. 3. Rage Transfer: Earlier spear-throwing episodes at David (18:11; 19:10) show a fixation; when David is absent, the rage redirects toward the nearest perceived accomplice: Jonathan. Dynastic Anxiety and the Threat to Succession Saul states the core motive: “neither you nor your kingdom will be established” (20:31). Ancient Near-Eastern monarchs secured dynasties by removing rivals; archaeological stelae (e.g., Hazael’s Tel Dan inscription) attest similar eliminations. Saul believes David’s continued life nullifies Jonathan’s claim, so Jonathan’s defense of David appears treasonous. Jonathan’s Covenant Loyalty to David Jonathan had “made a covenant with David, because he loved him as himself” (18:3). Covenants in the Hebrew Bible carry legal weight (Genesis 31:44). By siding with David, Jonathan prioritizes divine choice over bloodline. Saul interprets this as filial betrayal. The Spear as Symbol of Authority and Violence In Israelite warfare the spear (ḥănît) symbolized royal authority; Saul’s spear is beside him when he rules (22:6). Archaeological recoveries from Iron Age I sites (e.g., Izbet-Sartah) show socketed spearheads consistent with the biblical description. Saul’s hurling of the spear signifies both judicial sentence and attempted execution. Theological Significance 1. Covenant vs. Kinship: God’s chosen covenant (with David) supersedes dynastic bloodlines, foreshadowing Messiah’s kingdom (2 Samuel 7:12-16). 2. Sin’s Progression: Saul’s unchecked disobedience escalates from envy to attempted filicide, illustrating James 1:15—“sin, when it is fully grown, gives birth to death.” 3. Preservation of the Anointed: Despite royal power, Saul cannot thwart God’s plan, reinforcing Proverbs 21:30—“No wisdom, no understanding, no counsel can prevail against the LORD.” Practical and Pastoral Lessons • Misplaced ambition destroys families; prioritizing God’s will secures true legacy (Matthew 6:33). • Spiritual void invites destructive passions; continual submission to the Holy Spirit guards the heart (Galatians 5:16). • Courageous loyalty to God’s chosen path may incur earthly risk but gains divine commendation (Hebrews 11:32-34). Summary Saul hurled his spear at Jonathan because, in a moment of spiritual dereliction and political desperation, he believed Jonathan’s defense of David threatened both the royal succession and Saul’s personal sovereignty. Driven by jealousy, demonic torment, and dynastic fear, Saul turned his symbol of kingship into a weapon against his own son, demonstrating the tragic consequences of rejecting God’s authority and the invincibility of God’s redemptive plan. |
    |