Why does Ruth find favor in Boaz's eyes despite being a foreigner? Historical–Cultural Setting Ruth arrives in Bethlehem near the close of the Judges era, “when the judges ruled” (Ruth 1:1). Famine, social instability, and a fractured covenant community set the stage. Within this turbulence, Israel’s law still mandates compassion toward the oppressed, including widows, orphans, and “the foreigner who resides among you” (Deuteronomy 10:18–19). Boaz is introduced as “a man of standing” (Ruth 2:1), meaning a land-owner of noble character who consciously lives out these statutes. Chesed: Covenant Loyalty as Central Theme The Hebrew term חֶסֶד (chesed)—covenant-faithful kindness—appears throughout Ruth (1:8; 2:20; 3:10). Boaz recognizes in Ruth the same chesed that Yahweh expects of His people. Her decision to leave Moab and embrace Naomi’s God (1:16–17) is not merely migration but a covenantal conversion. Boaz’s favor, therefore, is less about ethnicity and more about fidelity to Yahweh’s covenant. Ruth’s Conversion and Confession of Faith Ruth’s plea—“Your people will be my people, and your God will be my God” (1:16)—constitutes a formal renunciation of Chemosh, the god of Moab (cf. the Moabite Stone, line 18), and an oath of allegiance to Yahweh. Under Torah, a foreigner who binds herself to Israel and keeps the covenant commands stands to receive full participation in Israel’s blessings (Exodus 12:48–49; Isaiah 56:3–7). Boaz thus responds to a covenant sister, not an outsider. Boaz’s Knowledge of Ruth’s Sacrificial Love Report of Ruth’s steadfast support of Naomi spreads quickly (2:11). She has left “father and mother and the land of [her] birth” (2:11), paralleling Abraham’s obedience (Genesis 12:1). Boaz, a descendant of Rahab the Canaanite (Matthew 1:5), is predisposed to recognize faith that transcends lineage. The text presents Boaz as a shrewd observer: he enquires, learns Ruth’s story, and consciously singles her out for favor. Torah Mandates for Gleaning and Welcoming the Foreigner Boaz’s compliance with Leviticus 19:9–10 and Deuteronomy 24:19 is explicit. “When you reap the harvest of your land, do not reap to the very edges… leave them for the poor and the foreigner.” Ruth’s gleaning is a legal right; Boaz’s additional protection, water, and shared meal exceed legal minima and exhibit supererogatory grace—what the New Testament will later call “exceeding righteousness” (cf. Matthew 5:20). Providence and Sovereignty The narrator affirms divine orchestration: “As it turned out, she came to the field belonging to Boaz” (2:3). In Hebrew idiom, this “chance” (מִקְרֶה) invites readers to see God’s invisible hand guiding events toward messianic culmination (4:17–22). Scripture repeatedly portrays God’s plan working through seeming coincidences (Genesis 50:20; Esther 4:14; Romans 8:28). Legal Status: Boaz as Go’el (Kinsman-Redeemer) Under Leviticus 25:25 and Deuteronomy 25:5–10, a near-relative may redeem land and lineage. Boaz, recognizing Ruth’s loyalty and Naomi’s plight, discerns a divine invitation to embody that office. His favor foreshadows Christ, our ultimate Redeemer, who “is not ashamed to call them brothers” (Hebrews 2:11) though they were once “foreigners to the covenants of the promise” (Ephesians 2:12-13). Ethical-Behavioral Dynamics From a behavioral-scientific perspective, favor typically arises from perceived costly altruism. Ruth’s self-sacrifice produces social capital and moral credibility; Boaz’s reciprocal generosity follows predictable patterns of prosocial behavior reinforced by shared values. Yet the narrative insists that theological conviction, not mere social reciprocity, drives both protagonists. Messianic Lineage and Theological Significance Ruth’s acceptance paves the way for David’s birth and ultimately for the Messiah. The genealogy in Ruth 4:18–22 culminates in “David,” which Matthew 1 extends to “Jesus who is called Christ.” The inclusion of foreign women (Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba) in that genealogy signals God’s redemptive intent for all nations (Genesis 12:3). Archaeological Corroboration 1. Tel Dan Inscription (9th century BC) verifies the historic “House of David,” validating Ruth’s climactic genealogy. 2. Moabite Stone (Mesha Stele, ca. 840 BC) confirms Moab’s national identity and Chemosh worship—alluded to in Ruth’s context. 3. Bethlehem’s Iron Age grain silos, uncovered by Hebrew University excavations (2012-2016), illustrate the region’s robust barley production, aligning with Ruth’s harvest backdrop. Practical Application Believers today are summoned to extend grace across ethnic and social boundaries (James 2:1). Boaz models proactive hospitality; Ruth exemplifies courageous faith. Together they demonstrate that identity in Yahweh transcends bloodlines, foreshadowing the church where “there is neither Jew nor Greek” (Galatians 3:28). Conclusion Ruth finds favor in Boaz’s eyes because covenant fidelity, divine providence, and Torah ethics converge. Her adoption of Yahweh nullifies her Moabite disadvantage; Boaz’s righteous obedience overcomes ethnic barriers. Their story reveals a God who delights to fold foreigners into His redemptive plan, ultimately culminating in the resurrection of the greater Kinsman-Redeemer, Jesus Christ. |
    |