Why does Jesus say the Father is greater?
Why does Jesus say, "The Father is greater than I" in John 14:28?

Canonical Text and Immediate Setting

John 14:28 : “You heard Me say, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved Me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.”

The verse sits in the Upper Room Discourse (John 13 – 17), moments before Gethsemane. Jesus comforts the Eleven, promises the Spirit, and explains His departure, resurrection, and the coming Paraclete.


Grammatical Observation

Greek: ὁ πατὴρ μείζων μού ἐστιν (ho patēr meizōn mou estin).

• Mείζων (“greater”) is comparative of μέγας (“great, eminent”).

• Contextual force favors “greater in position/relationship” rather than “greater in essence.”


Ontological vs. Functional Distinction

1. Ontological (being): Scripture affirms the full deity of Christ (John 1:1; 8:58; 10:30; 20:28; Colossians 2:9; Hebrews 1:3).

2. Economic/Functional (role): Within redemptive history the Son voluntarily submits to the Father’s authority (John 5:19, 30; 6:38). “Greater” thus expresses functional subordination during the Incarnation, not ontological inferiority.


Incarnational Context

Philippians 2:6-8 : though Jesus was “in very nature God,” He “emptied Himself” and “humbled Himself.” The Father is “greater” in the incarnate arrangement because:

• Jesus assumed true humanity (John 1:14).

• He accepted limitations of time, space, knowledge (Mark 13:32).

• He placed Himself under the Father’s mission (John 4:34).


Sent-and-Sender Motif in John

John 3:17, 4:34, 5:24, 30, 6:38, 8:42 repeatedly present the Father as the Sender and the Son as the Sent. In that missional hierarchy, the Sender is “greater” in authority (similar to John 13:16).


Inter-Trinitarian Harmony

John 10:30 – “I and the Father are one.”

John 14:9 – “He who has seen Me has seen the Father.”

Thus John presents both unity of essence and distinction of role. First-century readers, steeped in a patron-agent framework, would hear “greater” as referencing order, not nature.


Early Church Witness

• Ignatius (c. AD 110) calls Jesus “our God” (Letter to the Ephesians, 18) while also noting His submission.

• Athanasius (De Decretis, 26) argues John 14:28 refers to the incarnate economy, not to the Son’s eternal nature.

No extant patristic writer uses John 14:28 to deny Christ’s deity; they consistently interpret it within the Incarnational kenosis.


Parallel Affirmations of Equality

In the same discourse:

John 14:13 – Jesus receives prayer.

John 14:16-17 – He sends the Spirit.

John 16:15 – “All that belongs to the Father is Mine.”

If “greater” were ontological, these claims would be blasphemous. Instead, John balances equality and submission.


Resurrection Vindication

Acts 2:36 : “God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.” The resurrection publicly validates Jesus’ divine identity. A merely inferior creature cannot conquer death or grant eternal life (John 11:25-26).


Old Testament Precedent

Psalm 110:1 and Isaiah 52:13-53:12 portray Messiah as both exalted and suffering. The servant pattern explains how one who is equal with Yahweh can also act in humble obedience.


Philosophical Coherence

A tri-personal God of love (1 John 4:8) eternally expresses relational order without compromising unity. Authority and submission within the Trinity predate creation, grounding the moral fabric of human community (Ephesians 5:21-33).


Answering Common Objections

1. Jehovah’s Witness use: selective; ignores immediate context and wider Johannine Christology.

2. “Greater” equals “better” in nature? Hebrews 1:4 contrasts Christ with angels using κρείττων; John purposefully chooses μείζων, aligning with positional nuance.

3. Subordinationism? Ecumenical creeds (Nicene, Athanasian) safeguard co-eternity while acknowledging incarnational submission.


Practical Implications

• Humility: if the incarnate Son embraced submissive roles, believers can gladly submit to God-ordained structures (Philippians 2:3-11).

• Assurance: the Father’s exalted authority guarantees the Son’s promises (John 14:1-3).

• Worship: the verse invites adoration of the cooperative work of Father, Son, and Spirit.


Conclusion

John 14:28 highlights Jesus’ incarnate, mission-oriented submission to the Father, not a deficiency in deity. The Father is “greater” as Sender to the Sent Son, yet the Son remains fully God, eternally one in essence with the Father and the Holy Spirit.

How does John 14:28 support the concept of the Trinity?
Top of Page
Top of Page