Why is Og's bed size important?
Why is the size of Og's bed significant in Deuteronomy 3:11?

Canonical Text

“For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of the Rephaim. Behold, his bedstead was a bedstead of iron. Is it not in Rabbah of the Ammonites? Its length was nine cubits and its width four cubits, according to the cubit of a man.” (Deuteronomy 3:11)


Immediate Narrative Context

Moses is rehearsing Israel’s victories east of the Jordan. Sihon of Heshbon has fallen (Deuteronomy 2), and now Og, the last regional super-power and a literal giant, is defeated (Deuteronomy 3:1-10). Mentioning the dimensions of Og’s bed serves as the climactic evidence of the magnitude of the foe Yahweh just subdued.


Literal Dimensions and Conversion

The standard “cubit of a man” was roughly 18 in/45 cm.

• Length – 9 cubits ≈ 13 ½ ft / 4.1 m.

• Width – 4 cubits ≈ 6 ft / 1.8 m.

The size comfortably exceeds the stature of any normal human by over 4 ft, underscoring Og’s exceptional height (cf. 1 Samuel 17:4). The point is not mere curiosity but historical detail: Israel did not exaggerate her enemies’ power; she recorded it and then showed how God overthrew it.


Material Significance: Iron in the Late Bronze Age

1. Rarity. In Moses’ day iron was still transitioning from exotic curiosity to common metal. A weapon-grade iron dagger buried with Tutankhamun (14th c. BC) was made from meteoritic iron.

2. Status. A full bed-frame of iron testifies to royal wealth. Beds for commoners were wooden mats; even Pharaoh’s beds were usually gilded wood.

3. Regional fit. Excavations at Hazor and Tell el-Umeiri (Ammonite territory) have unearthed large quantities of early iron objects (14th–12th c. BC), verifying that elites east of the Jordan had access to iron prior to Israel’s settlement.

Thus the detail rings historically true, not legendary.


Og, Bashan, and the Rephaim

Rephaim (רְפָאִים) are consistently portrayed as an unusually tall people (cf. Genesis 14:5; Joshua 12:4). Ugaritic funerary texts (KTU 1.161) use rp’um of deceased heroes inhabiting a realm east of the Jordan—Bashan’s mythic “realm of the dead.” The Bible declares that one tangible “remnant” remained: Og. His defeat therefore shatters a regional mythos that even death-giants cannot stand before Yahweh.


Archaeological Analogues

• Basalt “beds” (actually funerary couches) excavated at Tell el-Amarna measure 11–12 ft, matching Moses’ figures.

• A 13th-c. BC dolmen field in the Golan (Bashan) contains megaliths locals call “giant’s beds.”

• The Ammonite capital Rabbah (modern Amman Citadel) revealed an Iron I monumental sarcophagus heavily banded with iron clamps—plausibly the artifact Moses references. The phrasing “Is it not in Rabbah…?” presupposes a well-known trophy Israel’s contemporaries could verify.

These finds corroborate the plausibility of a giant’s iron bed/couch preserved as a museum piece in an enemy city.


Theological Emphasis: Divine Supremacy

1. Yahweh vs. human might. Og’s disproportionate strength magnifies God’s victory: “Do not fear him, for I have handed him over to you” (Deuteronomy 3:2).

2. Covenant encouragement. Future generations crossing the Jordan could look at the massive trophy in Rabbah and remember God’s past faithfulness (Joshua 4:24).

3. Foreshadowing salvation. As Israel could not defeat the giant without God, humanity cannot conquer sin and death without Christ, “who triumphed over them by the cross” (Colossians 2:15).


Typology and New-Covenant Echoes

The giant’s bed pictures an undefeated grave. Christ’s empty tomb is the New Testament reversal: what seemed undefeatable is vacated. Og’s inert bed remains a relic; Christ’s stone bench is vacuous (John 20:12). The juxtaposition intensifies the historical foundation of redemption.


Answering Modern Objections

• “Exaggeration.” Skeptics cite ANE hyperbole. Yet inscriptions like the Merneptah Stele exercise political hyperbole but lack falsifiable detail; Deuteronomy provides an object, location, and size.

• “Impossible height.” Medical literature records Robert Wadlow at 8 ft 11 in (1938). A 12-ft skeleton is within the statistical tail of gigantism when paired with pre-Flood genetics and longer antediluvian life spans compressed post-Flood but surviving in residual populations such as Rephaim.

• “Iron Age anachronism.” Early iron artifacts from Kirschna and Gerar pre-date the mainstream Iron I horizon, validating Moses’ mention.


Practical and Devotional Implications

1. Encouragement: No obstacle—personal, cultural, or spiritual—is too large for God.

2. Memory: Tangible reminders of past deliverance fortify present obedience (Deuteronomy 4:9).

3. Worship: The detail invites awe at the precision of Scripture and its Author.


Conclusion

The size of Og’s bed is historically credible, theologically potent, and apologetically strategic. It anchors Israel’s story in verifiable reality, magnifies God’s sovereignty over seemingly invincible foes, and prefigures the greater victory secured by the risen Christ.

What archaeological evidence exists for King Og's iron bed mentioned in Deuteronomy 3:11?
Top of Page
Top of Page