Why is the temple important in Matt 4:5?
What is the significance of the temple in Matthew 4:5?

Text

“Then the devil took Him to the holy city and set Him on the pinnacle of the temple.” (Matthew 4:5)


Terminology And Grammar

• “Holy city” (ἁγίαν πόλιν, hagian polin) points unambiguously to Jerusalem, repeatedly called such in Isaiah 52:1 and later Jewish literature.

• “Temple” (τὸ ἱερόν, to hieron) designates the entire Temple complex, not merely the inner sanctuary (ναός, naos).

• “Pinnacle” (πτερύγιον, pterygion, lit. “little wing/projection”) is an architectural term for a jutting corner or wing-like ledge. Josephus records a vertiginous southeastern corner of the Temple that “made even the stoutest look down with dizziness” (War 5.5.2).


Historical And Archaeological Setting

Herod the Great began expanding Zerubbabel’s Second Temple in 20/19 BC. According to John 2:20, construction had already continued “forty-six years” by Jesus’ early ministry (c. AD 27). Today’s 500-ton Herodian ashlar blocks in the Western Wall, the “Trumpeting Stone” discovered in 1968, and the southwest corner steps excavated by Benjamin Mazar all corroborate the grandeur described by contemporary sources (Josephus, Mishnah Middot). The “pinnacle” most naturally fits the southeast corner overlooking the Kidron Valley—a drop of more than 130 ft (40 m) to the street level of Jesus’ day, and another 150 ft (46 m) into the ravine (War 5.5.2).


Religious Centrality Of The Temple

a. Dwelling of God’s shekinah glory (Exodus 25:8; 1 Kings 8:10–11).

b. Covenantal heart of Israel’s worship—sacrifices, feasts, priestly ministry (Leviticus 16; Deuteronomy 16).

c. Eschatological hope: “the Lord, whom you seek, will suddenly come to His temple” (Malachi 3:1).


Thematic Role In Matthew’S Gospel

Matthew repeatedly frames the Temple as both honored and surpassed:

• Birth narrative: Magi arrive in Jerusalem seeking “He who has been born King” (2:1-2).

• Teaching: “Something greater than the temple is here.” (12:6).

• Passion: The veil torn from top to bottom (27:51) signals the end of Temple-mediated access.

Thus, ch 4 already foreshadows the Gospel’s trajectory: Jesus is the climactic fulfillment and ultimate replacement of the earthly sanctuary.


Temptation Context And Purpose

The first temptation (stones-to-bread) probed physical necessity. The second shifts to public spectacle and messianic expectation. First-century Jewish writings (e.g., Pseudo-Jonathan on Isaiah 52:7; 4QFlorilegium I, 6-9) envision Messiah appearing “upon the height of the Temple.” Satan tries to co-opt this hope, urging Jesus to force divine vindication by leaping—and thereby tempt God. Jesus counters: “Again it is written: ‘You shall not test the Lord your God.’” (Deuteronomy 6:16; Matthew 4:7).


Misuse And Right Use Of Scripture

Satan quotes Psalm 91:11-12 selectively, omitting the crucial clause, “to guard you in all your ways,” i.e., in paths of obedience, not presumption. Jesus answers with Deuteronomy—Scripture interpreting Scripture—modeling proper hermeneutics and demonstrating that genuine faith trusts rather than manipulates God’s promises.


Sonship, Obedience, And Israel Parallel

Matthew frames Jesus as true Israel:

• Israel tested 40 years in wilderness; Jesus tested 40 days.

• Israel failed by demanding signs (Exodus 17:2–7); Jesus succeeds by refusing one.

The Temple setting intensifies the test: Will the Son trust the Father at the very place signifying divine presence, or will He demand sensational proof?


Typological Fulfillment: Jesus As The True Temple

a. Prophecy: “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19).

b. Apostolic witness: Believers are now “a holy temple in the Lord” (Ephesians 2:21), built on Christ the cornerstone (Ephesians 2:20; Psalm 118:22).

c. Eschaton: No physical temple in the New Jerusalem, “for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple” (Revelation 21:22).


Practical Application For Believers

• Guard against manipulating God by “claiming promises” outside His will.

• Refuse showmanship in ministry; exalt Christ, not spectacle.

• Embrace identity rooted in the Father’s declaration, not public acclaim.


Eschatological Foreshadowing

Within a generation, Rome demolished the very structure where Satan tempted Jesus (AD 70), vindicating Jesus’ prophetic warnings (Matthew 24:2). The episode thus previews the transience of earthly temples and the permanence of the risen Christ.


Summary

The Temple in Matthew 4:5 is more than a backdrop; it is the theological stage where Messiah’s true sonship, Israel’s story, and God’s redemptive plan converge. By refusing to leap, Jesus declares Himself the genuine fulfillment of all the Temple represented—God with us, obedient unto death, and ultimately vindicated in resurrection.

Why did the devil take Jesus to the holy city in Matthew 4:5?
Top of Page
Top of Page