Why mention Alexander in 2 Tim 4:14?
Why did Paul mention Alexander the coppersmith in 2 Timothy 4:14?

Text of 2 Timothy 4:14

“Alexander the coppersmith did me great harm. The Lord will repay him according to his deeds.”


Immediate Literary Context

Paul is closing his final epistle. In verses 9-18 he lists helpers (vv. 10-13) and opponents (vv. 14-15) to instruct Timothy whom to emulate and whom to avoid. Verse 14 stands between personal requests (“Bring Mark…”) and a worshipful doxology (“To Him be the glory forever…”), highlighting how Paul entrusts injustice to God while continuing ministry.


Who Was Alexander the Coppersmith?

1. The Greek “χαλκεύς” (chalkeus) refers to a metalworker in bronze or copper—occupations clustered in Ephesus, Paul’s longtime base (Acts 19).

2. Scripture records three men named Alexander:

• Alexander of Acts 19:33-34, pushed forward by Jews during the Ephesian riot;

• Alexander “handed over to Satan” with Hymenaeus for blasphemy (1 Timothy 1:19-20);

• Alexander the coppersmith here.

Linguistic, geographical, and chronological overlap suggest one individual appearing in all three texts, though certainty is impossible. All references involve Ephesus and opposition to apostolic work.


Historical Backdrop: The Coppersmith Guild of Ephesus

Archaeological excavations on Curetes Street (Ephesus) have uncovered workshops and dedicatory inscriptions by χαλκείς. Local guilds defended the cult of Artemis against Christian proclamation (Acts 19:24-27). A tradesman whose livelihood depended on idol-related metalwork would have powerful financial motives to resist Paul, especially if conversions shrank his market.


Nature of the “Great Harm”

The term “πολλά ἐνεδείξατο κακά” (“showed/caused many evils”) is used of violent or legal persecution (cf. Acts 12:1). Possibilities:

• Orchestrating legal accusations that led to Paul’s second Roman imprisonment (the epistle’s setting). Roman court terminology saturates 4:16-18.

• Testifying against Paul in court; early Fathers (e.g., Tertullian, Scorpiace 9) link Alexander with informing.

• Physical violence or incitement of riot, recalling Acts 19.

Paul gives no details; the Spirit preserved only what serves edification: the fact, not the specifics.


Why Paul Names Him Publicly

1. Protective Warning: “You too should be on your guard against him, because he fiercely opposed our message” (4:15). Naming shields Timothy and the Ephesian flock (cf. Titus 1:13).

2. Pastoral Modeling of Justice: Paul does not seek vengeance but entrusts it to the Lord, echoing Deuteronomy 32:35 and Romans 12:19.

3. Prophetic Precedent: OT prophets and NT apostles occasionally identify unrepentant enemies (e.g., Diotrephes, 3 John 9-10) to safeguard the church.

4. Apostolic Authority: By apostolic inspiration Paul’s naming carries canonical weight, distinguishing it from ordinary personal grievance.


Theological Themes

• Divine Retribution: “The Lord will repay” affirms God’s omniscient justice, relieving believers from personal retaliation (Proverbs 20:22).

• Perseverance in Ministry: Opposition is normative; Paul’s transparency encourages Timothy to endure (2 Timothy 3:12).

• Church Discipline vs. Final Judgment: Earlier (1 Timothy 1:20) Alexander was handed “to Satan” for corrective discipline; his continued hostility shows that rejecting correction leads to severer divine judgment.


Echoes in Early Church Literature

• Hippolytus (On the Twelve Apostles) counts Alexander among “those who betrayed Paul.”

• The Acts of Timothy (5th cent.) places Alexander in Ephesus leading legal petitions against Christians—legendary yet reflecting a remembered adversary.


Practical Application for Believers

• Expect Opposition: Faithfulness provokes resistance; recognize, but do not obsess over, antagonists.

• Guard the Flock: Leaders must name threats when concealment would imperil souls.

• Trust God’s Justice: Personal wrongs belong to the righteous Judge; believers focus on gospel proclamation.

• Maintain Hope: Paul speaks of Alexander and immediately testifies, “But the Lord stood by me” (4:17). God’s presence outweighs human hostility.


Conclusion

Paul mentions Alexander to warn Timothy, model entrusting vengeance to God, and illustrate the cost of gospel ministry. The brief verse embodies pastoral care, doctrinal teaching on divine justice, and historical realism, reminding every generation that the mission advances amid real antagonists—but under an even more real, sovereign Lord.

What practical steps can we take to forgive, following Paul's example in 2 Timothy 4:14?
Top of Page
Top of Page