Why mention Nebuchadnezzar's Tyre failure?
Why does Ezekiel 29:17 mention Nebuchadnezzar's failure to conquer Tyre?

Text and Immediate Context

Ezekiel 29:17–20 :

“In the twenty-seventh year, in the first month, on the first day, the word of the LORD came to me, saying, ‘Son of man, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon made his army labor greatly against Tyre; every head was rubbed bare and every shoulder was chafed, yet neither he nor his army received wages from Tyre for the labor he expended on it. Therefore, this is what the Lord GOD says: Behold, I will give the land of Egypt to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, and he will carry off its wealth, seize its spoil, and plunder it as wages for his army. I have given him the land of Egypt as pay for which he labored, because they worked for Me, declares the Lord GOD.’ ”


Chronological Placement inside Ezekiel

• 29:17–20 is Ezekiel’s last date-stamped oracle (April 26, 571 BC), but it is inserted before earlier-dated prophecies (chs. 30–32).

Ezekiel 26:1–14 (April 23, 587 BC) had predicted Tyre’s downfall “by Nebuchadnezzar.”

• Thus, 29:17–20 is a divine postscript roughly sixteen years after the siege ended, explaining why Babylon received Egypt instead.


Historical Background of the Babylon-Tyre Conflict

• Babylon’s armies besieged Tyre from 586/585 to 573/571 BC.

• Babylonian Chronicle BM 22047 confirms an expedition “against Ušu and Tyre” during Nebuchadnezzar’s 37th year.

• Josephus (Against Apion 1.156-160) cites Phoenician king lists that the siege lasted thirteen years.

• Mainland Tyre fell; the fortified island city held out. Babylon gained submission but virtually no plunder—confirmed by the absence of Tyrian tribute lists in surviving Babylonian economic texts.


Why the Siege Is Called a “Failure”

1. Economic Shortfall – Soldiers expected plunder (Deuteronomy 20:14); yet Tyre’s merchants evacuated wealth to the island. “Every head rubbed bare” evokes helmet straps worn for years with no payoff.

2. Prophetic Purpose – God often rewards nations He employs as instruments (Jeremiah 25:9–14; Isaiah 45:1–4). Babylon’s “wage” for serving divine justice had to come from somewhere else—Egypt.

3. Partial vs. Ultimate FulfillmentEzekiel 26’s language telescopes multiple waves of destruction: Nebuchadnezzar (mainland ruin) and later Alexander the Great, who literally scraped rubble into the sea (332 BC), matching 26:12. 29:17 acknowledges the incomplete phase under Nebuchadnezzar without negating the final outcome prophesied.


Theological Themes

Divine Sovereignty over Nations – Yahweh reallocates earthly empires’ pay packets (Daniel 2:21).

God Keeps Score – Labor “for Me” (29:20) highlights His moral governance even over pagan kings.

Justice for the Oppressed – Tyre’s exploitation of Judah (Joel 3:4–6) merited judgment; Egypt’s oppression (Exodus 1) invites similar recompense—showing God’s consistent character.


Consistency with the Rest of Scripture

Jeremiah 43–46 also predicts Babylon’s invasion of Egypt; Ezekiel 29 harmonizes, not contradicts.

Isaiah 23 foretells Tyre’s 70-year decline, then brief resurgence—precisely what occurred between Nebuchadnezzar’s siege and Alexander’s conquest.

• Prophetic “already/not yet” patterns (e.g., Malachi 3:1 / Matthew 11:10 and Revelation 11:15) validate the multi-stage fulfillment principle.


Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration

• Mainland Tyre’s destruction layers include a 6th-century BC burn-stratum beneath later Persian and Hellenistic debris.

• Alexander’s causeway (mole) incorporated stones from mainland ruins, leaving the site “bare rock,” a vivid archaeological echo of Ezekiel 26:4.

• Babylonian ration tablets to Jehoiachin (E bab) demonstrate Nebuchadnezzar’s precision in record-keeping, lending credibility to the Chronicle’s Tyre entry.


Practical and Devotional Takeaways

• Faithfulness in proclamation: Ezekiel records what might look like an embarrassing admission; integrity in God’s service matters more than optics.

• Assurance of God’s oversight: Even apparent setbacks serve His larger plan, as seen supremely in Christ’s crucifixion turning to resurrection (Acts 2:23–24).

• Warning to the proud: Tyre trusted commerce; Egypt trusted heritage; modern nations trust technology. All stand under the same sovereign verdict.


Conclusion

Ezekiel 29:17 mentions Nebuchadnezzar’s unprofitable siege to highlight God’s meticulous justice, to bridge the partial fulfillment of Tyre’s judgment with its ultimate ruin, and to demonstrate that even heathen empires receive wages only at Yahweh’s discretion. Far from undermining biblical reliability, the passage showcases prophetic transparency, historical precision, and theological depth—all converging to affirm Scripture’s unified testimony to a God who governs history and whose promises never fail.

What does Ezekiel 29:17 teach about God's faithfulness to fulfill His word?
Top of Page
Top of Page