Why does Paul reference Sarah and Hagar in Galatians 4:30? Canonical Text in Focus “But what does the Scripture say? ‘Expel the slave woman and her son, for the slave woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with the free woman’s son.’ ” (Galatians 4:30) Immediate Purpose of Paul’s Citation Paul quotes Genesis 21:10 to clinch a pastoral and doctrinal argument already underway (Galatians 4:21-29). His readers are wavering between gospel liberty and legalistic bondage. By invoking Sarah and Hagar he furnishes a Spirit-given, Scripture-anchored illustration showing that law-reliance and promise-reliance cannot coexist as co-heirs; one must be cast out. Historical Events Behind the Allegory 1. Genesis 16—Hagar, an Egyptian bondservant, bears Ishmael through Abram’s flesh-driven strategy. 2. Genesis 17—God reiterates that covenant seed will come through Sarah. 3. Genesis 21—Isaac is born “according to promise”; Sarah demands that Abraham “drive out the slave woman and her son.” God endorses the demand (Genesis 21:12). These real events—dated c. 2066–2030 BC on a Ussher-style chronology—form the literal substrate for Paul’s Spirit-taught typology. Typological Structure Paul Draws • Hagar → Sinai covenant → present Jerusalem → slavery (Galatians 4:24-25) • Sarah → Abrahamic promise → Jerusalem above → freedom (Galatians 4:26-28) Isaac’s conception bypassed human scheming; Ishmael’s originated in human effort. So, too, gospel righteousness is supernaturally birthed, whereas law-keeping is flesh-powered and barren of salvific life (Romans 9:6-8). Exegetical Logic of ‘Expel’ 1. Inheritance is singular and exclusive (Galatians 3:16; 4:7). 2. Co-habitation of two principles—law-confidence and faith-confidence—creates spiritual conflict, just as Ishmael mocked Isaac (Genesis 21:9; cf. Galatians 4:29). 3. Therefore, decisive separation is mandated: “Stand firm…do not be burdened again by a yoke of slavery” (Galatians 5:1). Pastoral and Behavioral Application Paul’s directive equips believers to recognize and repudiate modern equivalents of Hagar—ritualism, moralism, self-salvation projects. Behavioral science affirms that competing motivational systems breed cognitive dissonance; likewise, hybrid spiritualities breed bondage. The gospel dissolves that conflict by rooting identity in grace alone. Cross-References for Study • Romans 4:19-21—Sarah’s barrenness contrasted with covenant power. • Hebrews 12:18-24—Mount Sinai vs. Mount Zion. • Isaiah 54:1—prophetic basis for “Rejoice, O barren woman” (quoted in Galatians 4:27). • John 8:34-36—slaves vs. sons clarified by Jesus. Archaeological and Extrabiblical Corroboration Nineteenth-century excavations at Tell el-Maqata and Beersheba reveal Middle Bronze Age nomadic encampments aligning with patriarchal lifeways described in Genesis 21. Ebla tablets (c. 2300 BC) list names phonetically parallel to “Ishmael,” showcasing historic plausibility of the narrative’s cultural milieu. Concluding Synthesis Paul references Sarah and Hagar to declare, on Scriptural authority, that salvation and inheritance flow only through the miraculous, promise-anchored line represented by Sarah’s son. Any system grounded in human effort must be expelled, for it cannot coexist with the freedom purchased by the risen Christ. |
    |