Why mention concubines in the Bible?
Why are concubines mentioned in the Bible, as seen in 1 Chronicles 2:48?

Definition and Terminology

A concubine in the Old Testament is a legally recognized secondary wife of lower social rank than a full wife, entitled to protection and provision but lacking the inheritance status of a primary spouse. Hebrew uses two chief terms: pilgêš (פִּילֶגֶשׁ) for “concubine,” and ’āmâ (אָמָה) for “female servant.” Ancient Near-Eastern tablets from Nuzi and Mari confirm the practice as a social safety net for childless marriages, military captivity, or economic alliance. Scripture’s transparent use of the term preserves historical accuracy without moral endorsement.


Legal and Social Framework in Ancient Israel

1. Exodus 21:7-11 regulates a father selling a daughter as a servant-wife, mandating food, clothing, and marital rights—placing limits unknown in surrounding cultures.

2. Deuteronomy 21:10-14 protects war captives taken as concubines, requiring a mourning period and forbidding resale.

3. Judges 8:30-31 and 2 Samuel 5:13 show the custom among leaders, reflecting social hierarchy rather than divine ideal.

These regulations function not to promote concubinage but to restrain abuse in a fallen society (cf. Matthew 19:8).


Scriptural Occurrences and Patterns

• Patriarchs: Hagar (Genesis 16), Bilhah and Zilpah (Genesis 30) illustrate how concubines expanded family lines.

• National Leaders: Saul (2 Samuel 3:7), David (2 Samuel 5:13), Solomon (1 Kings 11:3) accumulated concubines, often leading to spiritual compromise.

• Ordinary Israelites: The tragic episode of Judges 19 exposes moral chaos when “every man did what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25).

Through each narrative, Scripture distinguishes between divine prescription (Genesis 2:24) and human practice.


Why 1 Chronicles 2:48 Lists a Concubine

“Caleb’s concubine Maacah bore him Sheber and Tirhanah.”

1. Genealogical Precision: Chronicles documents Judah’s tribal lines to authenticate land inheritance after the exile and ultimately trace the royal-Messianic lineage (cf. 1 Chronicles 2:15; Matthew 1:3-6). Omitting concubinage lines would jeopardize legal clarity.

2. Historical Candor: By recording Maacah, the writer models the reliability that undergirds all biblical historiography (cf. Luke 1:3-4).

3. Theological Contrast: Caleb—celebrated for faith (Numbers 14:24)—nonetheless fathered children by a concubine, reminding readers that even heroes need redemption.


Descriptive, Not Prescriptive

Passages citing concubines are narrative reportage. Scripture’s ethical stance appears in passages such as:

Genesis 2:24 : “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.”

Malachi 2:15-16 warns against treachery to “the wife of your youth.”

Matthew 19:4-6 reaffirms monogamy.

1 Timothy 3:2; Titus 1:6 restrict church leaders to “the husband of one wife.”

Progressive revelation culminates in the New Covenant ideal of exclusive, covenantal marriage reflecting Christ and the Church (Ephesians 5:31-32).


Genealogical Integrity and the Messianic Promise

Chronicling concubine offspring preserves the unbroken thread from Abraham through Judah to David and ultimately to Christ, who alone fulfills the promise “in your seed all the nations of the earth will be blessed” (Genesis 22:18). Even lines originating in imperfect unions are woven into God’s redemptive tapestry—e.g., Perez (born of Tamar) in Matthew 1:3.


Moral Evaluation and Consequences

Scripture transparently depicts the fallout of concubinage:

• Household rivalry: Sarah vs. Hagar (Genesis 16).

• Political upheaval: Absalom’s seizure of David’s concubines (2 Samuel 16:21-22).

• Spiritual apostasy: Solomon’s foreign concubines turning his heart (1 Kings 11:3-4).

These outcomes underscore that deviation from God’s design yields relational and societal turmoil, thereby validating divine standards.


Lessons for Contemporary Readers

1. God’s Word records reality, warts and all, demonstrating its historical trustworthiness.

2. Human sinfulness—even among covenant people—magnifies the necessity of a perfect Savior.

3. The dignity and protection God accords to the vulnerable (concubines, widows, orphans) anticipate the gospel ethic of sacrificial love.


Conclusion

Concubines appear in Scripture because God records real history to display both human depravity and divine grace. 1 Chronicles 2:48 includes Maacah to safeguard genealogical exactness, highlight the contrast between God’s faithful promises and man’s flawed choices, and ultimately point to Christ, the true Bridegroom who redeems and perfects His people.

How does 1 Chronicles 2:48 reflect the cultural norms of ancient Israel?
Top of Page
Top of Page