Why mention "hate enemy" in Matt 5:43?
Why does Jesus reference "hate your enemy" in Matthew 5:43 if it's not in the Old Testament?

Text of the Passage

Matthew 5:43-45: “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor’ and ‘hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven.”


No Explicit Old Testament Command to Hate an Enemy

Nowhere does the Hebrew Bible command, “Hate your enemy.” Leviticus 19:18 positively commands, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” The Torah also safeguards enemies: “If you come across your enemy’s ox or donkey wandering off, you must return it” (Exodus 23:4-5). Proverbs 25:21-22 instructs, “If your enemy is hungry, give him food to eat.” The absence of a direct mandate to hate, joined to repeated calls to kindness, shows that Jesus is correcting an interpretive tradition, not Scripture itself.


Second-Temple Jewish Tradition Behind the Phrase

1. Qumran Scrolls. 1QS (Rule of the Community) 1.10-11: “Love all the sons of light … and hate all the sons of darkness.” These Essene writings, dated c.150 B.C., demonstrate that at least one Jewish sect explicitly paired love for the in-group with hate for outsiders.

2. Oral Halakic Limitation. Rabbinic discussions (m.Sanh. 45b; t.Shevuot 3.6) narrow “neighbor” (רֵעַ, reʿa) to a covenant member. By implication those outside the covenant could be viewed as legitimate objects of hatred or neglect.

3. Targumic Paraphrase. Some Aramaic paraphrases of Leviticus 19 confine “neighbor” to “sons of your people,” silently excluding foreigners, lending itself to the antithesis Jesus cites.

4. Imprecatory Usage. Psalm 137:7-9; Psalm 139:21-22; and Deuteronomy-Joshua conquest narratives were sometimes misread as blanket warrants to despise national enemies. While these texts concern judicial or covenantal judgment, the popular takeaway could devolve into personal animosity.


Jesus’ Introductory Formula—“You Have Heard”

In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus contrasts six traditional teachings with His own authoritative exposition. When He quotes Scripture He says, “It is written” (e.g., Matthew 4:4). Here He says, “You have heard,” signaling He is addressing received rabbinic tradition—not the inspired text. His hearers had literally “heard” this teaching in synagogue exposition and oral instruction.


Affirming the Old Testament, Correcting the Add-on

Matthew 5:17-19 underscores Jesus’ full endorsement of the Law and the Prophets. By repudiating hatred of enemies He is defending the original intent of Moses—true neighbor-love that reflects God’s own benevolence (Exodus 34:6-7).


Continuity of Enemy-Love in the Hebrew Scriptures

Exodus 23:4-5—Aid your enemy’s stray animal.

Leviticus 19:33-34—Love the stranger as yourself.

Job 31:29-30—Job disavows rejoicing at a foe’s downfall.

Proverbs 24:17—“Do not gloat when your enemy falls.”

2 Kings 6:21-23—Elisha feeds captured Arameans and sends them home.

Jesus’ ethic did not overturn Torah morality; it brought the latent principle to its climactic expression.


Why the Tradition Drifted Toward Hate

• National Trauma. Occupation by successive empires (Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome) intensified “us-versus-them” identity.

• Sectarian Purity. Groups like the Pharisees and Essenes sought ritual and moral separation, recasting outsiders as threats to holiness.

• Selective Reading. Judicial or warfare passages were universalized, while merciful passages were minimized, breeding an ethic of retaliation.


The Rhetorical Impact of Jesus’ Reversal

By juxtaposing the popular saying with His own command, Jesus:

1. Exposes superficial righteousness (Matthew 5:20).

2. Extends love beyond reciprocity (Matthew 5:46-47).

3. Mirrors divine grace—“He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good” (5:45).

4. Establishes kingdom ethics that culminate in the cross (Romans 5:8—God loved us while we were enemies).


Archaeological Corroboration of Immediate Context

• First-century Galilean synagogues (e.g., Magdala) show carved seating and reading platforms, illustrating how Scripture was read aloud—people literally “heard” tradition.

• Qumran’s proximity (c.20 km from Jericho) places Essene ideology geographically near the Jordan ministry setting, making their “hate the sons of darkness” motif culturally relevant to Jesus’ hearers.


Theological Grounding: God’s Character as Model

Exodus 34:6-7 highlights Yahweh’s compassionate nature; Jesus applies that attribute horizontally. “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect” (Matthew 5:48). Enemy-love is not arbitrary; it reflects God’s indiscriminate providence and foreshadows the gospel proclamation to Gentiles (Acts 10:34-35).


Practical Discipleship Implications

• Prayer for persecutors (5:44) turns hostility into intercession, seen in Stephen’s martyrdom (Acts 7:60).

• Non-retaliation testified in early Christian martyr letters (e.g., Ignatius, Polycarp).

• Mission Strategy: Loving enemies opened doors for evangelism among Romans, Vikings, and modern persecuting regimes.


Conclusion

Jesus cites “You have heard … hate your enemy” because it summed up a prevailing interpretive tradition, not because it was ever Torah command. By dismantling that tradition, He restores and intensifies the Law’s heart: indiscriminate covenant love that reflects the Creator’s own goodness and reaches its apex in the cross and resurrection—the definitive act whereby God loved His enemies and reconciled them to Himself.

How does Matthew 5:43 challenge traditional views on love and enmity?
Top of Page
Top of Page