Why does God allow divination in Ezekiel 21:21? Text and Immediate Translation “For the king of Babylon stands at the fork in the road, at the junction of the two roads, to perform divination: he shakes the arrows, he consults the idols, he examines the liver. In his right hand is the lot for Jerusalem…” (Ezekiel 21:21–22a) Historical Setting • Date: c. 592–588 BC, within the prophet’s second decade of captivity in Babylon. • Geopolitical backdrop: Nebuchadnezzar II has already besieged Jerusalem once (597 BC). A second, decisive march is imminent (cf. 2 Kings 24:10–16; Babylonian Chronicle “Nebuchadnezzar II, Years 7–11,” tablet BM 21946). • Fork in the road: One branch leads north-west to Rabbah of Ammon (modern ʿAmmān, Jordan); the other south-west to Jerusalem. Archaeological surveys along both routes verify Neo-Babylonian military traffic (pottery horizons, siege-mounds, and arrowheads catalogued in the Amman Citadel excavations and the City of David “Burnt Room”). Divination in the Ancient Near East Arrow-shaking (belomancy), teraphim consultation, and hepatoscopy are well-attested: • Mari liver models (EA 30–35, Louvre) list identical omen formulae. • Neo-Assyrian omen compendium Bārûtu parallels Ezekiel’s triad. These artifacts corroborate the accuracy of Ezekiel’s description, an eyewitness in exile (Ezekiel 1:1), not a later redactor. Biblical Ban on Divination The Torah unambiguously forbids the very practices described (Deuteronomy 18:10-12; Leviticus 19:26). Israel’s prophets echo the ban (Isaiah 47:13-14; Jeremiah 27:9-10). Thus God’s moral stance is non-negotiable: divination is sin, a counterfeit of genuine revelation. Why, then, does God allow it here? 1. Sovereign Instrumentality God governs even pagan kings: “The king’s heart is a stream of water in the hand of the LORD; He directs it wherever He pleases” (Proverbs 21:1). Nebuchadnezzar’s lots simply become the steering wheel of Providence. The Babylonian king believes his gods speak; in reality, Yahweh “puts a hook in his jaws” (Ezekiel 38:4). 2. Judicial Judgment Against Covenant Breakers Ezekiel 21 is a lawsuit oracle. Judah has invoked curses by oath-breaking (cf. Ezekiel 17:15-21). The Lord therefore employs Babylon as His rod (Habakkuk 1:6-12). Allowing pagan divination to succeed magnifies the sentence: Israel will fall not merely to brute force but to what she wrongly chased—foreign spiritual powers. 3. Exposure of Idolatry’s Futility The same chapter later mocks the sword of Babylon (vv. 28-32). Yahweh lets the ritual appear effective only to unveil its impotence: after Jerusalem’s fall, the city of Rabbah is also judged (Jeremiah 49:2; Amos 1:13-15). Pagan omens provide no lasting security. Thus the event becomes a living parable contrasting false guidance with God’s unerring word through Ezekiel (v. 24). 4. Demonstration of Prophetic Reliability Ezekiel prophesies the exact method (“he shakes the arrows”) before Nebuchadnezzar performs it. When the news reaches the exiles, the fulfilled detail validates the prophet and discredits rival voices (Ezekiel 13:6-9). Manuscript attestation—MT (Leningrad B 19A), 4Q Ezekiel fragments, and early Septuagint—shows no material variation, underscoring textual stability. 5. Precedent of God Overruling Pagan Oracles • Balaam (Numbers 22–24) blesses Israel against Moab’s request. • Joseph’s “divining cup” ruse (Genesis 44:5) advances covenant promises. • Philistine lords use golden tumors and lots (1 Samuel 6); God directs the cows straight to Beth-shemesh. Ezekiel 21 fits this pattern: divine sovereignty does not equal divine endorsement. 6. Foreshadowing of the Cross The ultimate instance of God permitting evil instruments is Calvary (Acts 2:23). Roman crucifixion, a pagan invention, becomes the very means of redemption. Ezekiel 21 anticipates this logic: God turns human sin to divine triumph. Philosophical and Behavioral Perspective Allowing divination illustrates libertarian freedom within divine determinism. People act according to their desires; God ordains outcomes without being author of sin (James 1:13). Psychologically, humans crave certainty; divination exploits that desire. Scripture redirects the craving to trust in revelation, culminating in the risen Christ, whose historically attested resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3-8; minimal-facts argument) provides better epistemic grounds than any omen. Archaeological and Textual Corroboration • Lachish Letter 4 laments, “We are watching for the signals from Lachish … we cannot see Azekah,” aligning with Nebuchadnezzar’s approach described in Jeremiah 34:7. • Ketef Hinnom silver amulets (Priestly Blessing, ca. 600 BC) confirm Judah’s theological milieu immediately before the siege. • Babylonian Chronicle confirms that in 589/588 BC “the king of Babylon mustered his army and marched to the land of Hatti.” Moral Coherence of Scripture No contradiction exists between Deuteronomic prohibition and Ezekiel 21. Divine law forbids the practice to His covenant people; divine providence can nonetheless commandeer all secondary causes, even sinful ones, for righteous ends (Romans 8:28; Genesis 50:20). Practical Application Believers must: • Reject all forms of occultism, horoscopes, tarot, “Christian” Ouija, or algorithmic fortune-telling. • Rest in God’s word, which “is able to save your souls” (James 1:21). • Recognize that cultural fascination with the paranormal is a mission field. Like Paul in Athens, we can proclaim the “unknown God” (Acts 17:23) who proved His claim by raising Jesus from the dead (v. 31). Conclusion God allows the Babylonian king’s divination in Ezekiel 21 not by condoning the practice but by sovereignly directing it to fulfill His decreed judgment, vindicate His prophet, unmask idolatry, and prefigure the greater redemption accomplished through Christ. The episode marries historical precision, theological depth, and moral clarity—another exhibit of Scripture’s flawless coherence and divine authorship. |
    |