Why question God's abandonment in Lam 5:20?
Why does Lamentations 5:20 question God's apparent abandonment of His people?

Text of Lamentations 5:20

“Why do You forget us forever? Why do You forsake us for so long?”


Canonical Placement and Immediate Context

Lamentations is a five-chapter, acrostic poem placed in the Ketuvim (“Writings”) of the Hebrew canon and positioned after Jeremiah in most English Bibles, reflecting common authorship and subject matter. Chapter 5 breaks the acrostic pattern, signaling a climactic corporate prayer. Verse 20 comes near the end of the prayer (vv. 19-22) and voices the core anguish: the palpable sense that God has distanced Himself after Jerusalem’s destruction (586 BC).


Historical Setting: The 586 BC Catastrophe

• Babylonian Chronicles (ABC 5) and Nebuchadnezzar’s inscriptions corroborate Scripture’s account of Jerusalem’s fall.

• Archaeological layers at the City of David, Lachish Level III, and Ramat Raḥel show burn layers and arrowheads consistent with 6th-century siege warfare.

• Jeremiah had warned that covenant violation would invite exile (Jeremiah 25:8-11); Lamentations records the aftermath. The people’s question in 5:20 rises from war-starved streets, temple ruins, and deportation caravans they could still see in memory.


Literary Genre: Lament as Faith in Crisis

Biblical lament is not unbelief but covenant dialogue. A rhetorical “Why?” (Heb. lāmmâ) acknowledges God’s sovereignty even while protesting His perceived silence (cf. Psalm 22:1). The tension between God’s promises and present misery generates the lament’s power.


Covenantal Framework: Blessings, Curses, and Exile

Deuteronomy 28:15-68 laid out exile as the climax of covenant curses. Lamentations 5:20 reflects corporate awareness that the nation’s sin precipitated divine judgment (Lamentations 1:18; 3:42). The “abandonment” is judicial, not capricious. Yet covenant also guaranteed restoration after repentance (Leviticus 26:40-45; Deuteronomy 30:1-10). Questioning God thus presses Him to remember His own covenant faithfulness.


Theological Significance of God’s “Forgetting”

Hebrew śākhaḥ (“forget”) is anthropopathic language; the Omniscient cannot literally lose memory (Isaiah 49:15). The community feels the relational consequences of sin (Isaiah 59:1-2). Divine “forsaking” (ʿāzab) in prophetic literature is temporary and disciplinary (Hosea 5:15) with the intent to refine and restore.


Purpose of Divine Discipline

Scripture interprets suffering for covenant breach as corrective, not merely punitive (Hebrews 12:5-11; Proverbs 3:11-12). The Babylonian exile purged idolatry, re-centered worship on the written Word (cf. Ezra’s reforms), and preserved a remnant for Messiah’s lineage (Jeremiah 23:3-6).


Faith’s Protest as Hope-Seed

Immediately after the question, Lamentations ends with a plea: “Restore us to Yourself, O LORD, that we may return” (5:21). The very act of addressing God presupposes belief that He still hears. The question “Why?” functions as an appeal to God’s character expressed in 5:19: “You, O LORD, reign forever; Your throne endures from generation to generation.”


Typological Fulfillment in Christ

Jesus, entering exile’s depth on the cross, echoed the language of abandonment: “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?” (Matthew 27:46 quoting Psalm 22:1). His resurrection assures that divine silence is never final. Paul connects Israel’s exile themes to gospel reconciliation (Romans 11:11-15), guaranteeing that God has not permanently rejected His people.


Psychological and Behavioral Dimension

Lament permits healthy emotional processing. Clinical studies on grief narratives show that verbalizing perceived abandonment accelerates cognitive re-framing and resilience. Scripture models this centuries before modern psychology.


Archaeological and Extrabiblical Corroboration

• Lachish Ostraca #3 references the Babylonian advance exactly as Jeremiah predicted (Jeremiah 34:7).

• A 2020 study of soot layers in First-Temple strata employed paleomagnetic data to date the fire to the early 6th cent. BC, matching biblical chronology. Such data bolster the historical canvas on which Lamentations was penned.


Implications for Believers Today

1. Feeling forsaken does not equal being forsaken; covenant love endures (Lamentations 3:22-23).

2. Corporate confession and intercession remain vital in national crises.

3. Lament invites believers to marry honesty about pain with unwavering hope in God’s promises (Romans 8:18-39).


Summary Answer

Lamentations 5:20 questions God’s apparent abandonment because the people, under covenant judgment for sin, experience the tangible withdrawal of blessings and presence. The question is a faith-filled protest that appeals to God’s covenant loyalty, anticipates restoration, and ultimately points forward to Christ, who bore true abandonment so His people would never be finally forsaken.

How does Lamentations 5:20 encourage us to remain steadfast in prayer and faith?
Top of Page
Top of Page