Why would God reintroduce diseases on His chosen people in Deuteronomy 28:60? Canonical Context Deuteronomy 28 is the covenant ratification text that mirrors ancient Near-Eastern suzerain-vassal treaties. Verses 1-14 list blessings for obedience; verses 15-68 detail curses for disobedience. Deuteronomy 28:60 stands near the close of the curse section and reads, “He will bring back upon you all the diseases of Egypt that you dreaded, and they will cling to you” . The phrase “bring back” (Heb. hēšîb) echoes treaty language in which a suzerain enforces penalties previously exacted on rival nations. Historical and Archaeological Corroboration Egyptian medical papyri (Ebers, Edwin Smith, c. 1550 BC) catalog eye diseases, boils, worms, and hemorrhagic disorders. Paleopathology of mummies from the New Kingdom reveals schistosomiasis, smallpox-like lesions, and osteomyelitis. These fit the Exodus plagues (Exodus 9:10, 11:1). The verse presumes a memory of specific Egyptian pandemics still dreaded by the wilderness generation, giving the threat concrete historical force. Covenant Theology: Blessings and Curses 1. Covenant Enforcement. Yahweh’s covenant includes both positive and negative sanctions (Leviticus 26; Deuteronomy 28). Curses are not arbitrary; they apply the agreed-upon treaty terms. 2. Reciprocal Justice. Just as deliverance from Egypt displayed God’s favor, the “return” of Egyptian diseases displays covenant breach (cf. Deuteronomy 28:27, “the boils of Egypt”). 3. Consistency of Character. God’s justice demands He uphold His word. To ignore disobedience would violate His holiness (Habakkuk 1:13). Divine Holiness and Justice God is “compassionate and gracious” (Exodus 34:6) yet also “will by no means leave the guilty unpunished” (Exodus 34:7). The reintroduction of diseases vindicates divine holiness by: • Exposing sin’s seriousness (Romans 6:23). • Demonstrating impartiality—Israel is not exempt from the standards applied to Egypt (Amos 3:2). Discipline and Pedagogy Hebrews 12:6 states, “The Lord disciplines the one He loves.” Discipline points to: • Correction—pain leads to repentance (2 Chron 7:13-14). • Preservation of the remnant—purging covenant breakers protects future generations and the Messianic line (Isaiah 6:13). Corporate Solidarity and Representative Responsibility Ancient Israel functioned corporately; leaders’ sin implicated the nation (Joshua 7). Covenant curses fall on the collective precisely because the covenant was accepted collectively (Exodus 24:3). This communal dimension foreshadows Christ, the representative who bears the curse for many (Isaiah 53:5). Natural and Supernatural Nexus Israel’s law contained hygienic provisions (e.g., quarantine, sanitation in Leviticus 13-15; Deuteronomy 23:12-14) that, when obeyed, limited disease spread—confirmed by modern epidemiology. Rejecting those statutes invited natural epidemiological consequences and supernatural intensification as God withdrew protective providence (Numbers 21:6). Typological Foreshadowing of the Gospel Galatians 3:10-13 cites Deuteronomy to prove that all who rely on law-keeping are “under a curse,” but “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law by becoming a curse for us.” The plague language anticipates: • The need for substitutionary atonement. • The eschatological reversal where “there will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain” (Revelation 21:4). Moral Objections Addressed 1. “Is God cruel?” – The covenant curses are judicial, not capricious. They come with prior warning (Deuteronomy 30:15-20). 2. “What about innocent sufferers?” – Scripture acknowledges intergenerational consequences (Exodus 20:5) yet also personal accountability (Ezekiel 18). Temporal suffering does not negate eternal justice. 3. “Why use disease?” – In a fallen creation, disease is a vivid, experiential tutor that exposes mortality and drives souls to seek divine mercy (Psalm 90:12). Implications for Contemporary Believers While the Mosaic covenant has been superseded in Christ (Hebrews 8:13), divine discipline remains (1 Corinthians 11:30-32). Chronic sin can forfeit God’s protective hedge, allowing natural consequences. The passage therefore: • Warns nations blessed with gospel light against presuming upon grace. • Calls the church to holiness, lest its lampstand be removed (Revelation 2:5). Conclusion Deuteronomy 28:60 is covenant litigation: a holy God enforcing agreed-upon sanctions to provoke repentance, preserve a faithful remnant, and foreshadow the ultimate curse-bearer, Jesus Messiah. The same justice that reintroduced Egypt’s diseases upon a rebellious Israel later placed the weight of every curse upon the crucified Christ, offering eternal healing to all who believe (1 Peter 2:24). |
    |