Why did God command the Israelites to take spoils in Numbers 31:11? Passage “Then they took all the plunder and all the spoils, including both people and animals.” (Numbers 31:11) Historical and Covenant Context The Midianite campaign came immediately after Midian’s plot with Moab to seduce Israel into idolatry at Peor (Numbers 25). Twenty-four thousand Israelites died under divine judgment. God’s command in Numbers 31 was therefore not imperial expansion but judicial retaliation within His covenant with Israel (Genesis 12:3; Exodus 17:14-16). Archaeological surveys in the Wadi Arabah and northwestern Arabia (e.g., Timna copper mines, Midianite “Qurayyah Painted Ware”) verify an affluent Midianite culture in Moses’ day, matching the vast livestock totals recorded in Numbers 31:32-35. Divine Justice Against Midian’s Sin Yahweh’s holiness required recompense for Midian’s deliberate spiritual assault (Deuteronomy 32:35). Like the Flood or Sodom, the judgment was punitive, not capricious. Midianite males and all women who had participated in immorality were executed (Numbers 31:17). Virgins, uninvolved in the Peor seduction, were spared as servants or future wives under protective laws (Deuteronomy 21:10-14). This eliminated the moral contagion while preserving innocent life, reflecting lex talionis justice (“life for life,” Exodus 21:23). Sorts of War in Torah: Ḥerem versus Permitted Plunder Two war categories appear in the Pentateuch: 1. Ḥerem—total ban, no spoils kept (Jericho, Joshua 6). 2. Ordinary punitive or defensive war—spoils allowed (Deuteronomy 20:14). Midian lay outside Canaan’s borders; thus the action fell into the second category. The divine ban applied only where the Canaanite religious system would otherwise pollute the land promised to Israel. Taking spoils from Midian therefore violated no prior command and in fact obeyed Deuteronomy 20:14 : “But you may take the women, the children, the livestock, and everything else in the city as your plunder. You may enjoy the spoil of your enemies that the LORD your God gives you.” Provision for the Covenant Community Forty years of wilderness wandering left Israel with minimal resources. The Midianite livestock—675 000 sheep, 72 000 cattle, 61 000 donkeys—supplied food, draft animals, and breeding stock as Israel prepared to enter Canaan. The plunder also compensated families who had lost wage-earning fathers or brothers to the plague at Peor and to the present battle. Ancient Near-Eastern treaties (Hittite “Instructions to Commanders,” ANET §165) similarly remunerated troops; yet Israel’s distribution was unusually equitable: half to 12 000 soldiers, half to 600 000 non-combatants (Numbers 31:25-27). Theological Principles in the Distribution • Tribute to Yahweh—“From the soldiers who went into battle, set apart a tribute for the LORD—one in five hundred” (Numbers 31:28-29). This confessed that victory and wealth come from God (Proverbs 10:22). • Provision for ministry—The Levites received one in fifty from the congregational half (31:30). God’s servants were supported without taxation of Israel’s poor. • Communal equality—David later applied the same principle (1 Samuel 30:23-24), demonstrating canonical consistency. Purification and Sanctification of the Spoils Every object passed through fire or water plus a seven-day quarantine (Numbers 31:22-24). Such ritual cleansing acknowledged that mere material gain cannot enter sacred use without holiness. The emphasis anticipates New-Covenant cleansing through Christ’s blood (Hebrews 9:13-14). Typological and Christological Significance After His resurrection Christ “disarmed the principalities and…made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them” (Colossians 2:15). Early church writers saw the Midianite plunder prefiguring Messiah plundering Satan’s realm and bestowing gifts on His people (Ephesians 4:8). As Israel tithed spoils, believers dedicate every victory’s gain—time, talent, treasure—to God’s glory. Moral and Philosophical Clarifications 1. Not Divine Favoritism—Genesis 15:16 shows God delayed Canaan’s judgment four generations; likewise Midian’s iniquity had “reached full measure.” 2. Not Greed—Disobedient plunder brought judgment on Achan (Joshua 7). Here, plunder was commanded, regulated, tithed, and purified. 3. Just-War Criteria—Midian’s aggression (Numbers 25) satisfied the Augustinian/Aquinian principle of justa causa; divine command supplied legitimate authority; proportionality existed in sparing innocents. 4. Cultural Context—Ancient literature (e.g., the Egyptian Papyrus Anastasi I) depicts customary spoil rights far harsher than Mosaic limits, highlighting ethical distinctiveness. Archaeological and Manuscript Corroboration • Dead Sea Scroll fragments of Numbers (4Q28-30) match the Masoretic text word-for-word at Numbers 31:11-15, underscoring textual stability. • Ostraca from Kuntillet ‘Ajrud record Yahweh’s name alongside travel rations lists, confirming 9th-century-BC memory of desert campaigns. • Edomite and Midianite copper-slag mounds at Timna show sudden occupational hiatuses in the Late Bronze collapse, consistent with large-scale livestock loss described in Numbers 31. Applications for Believers Today • God is owner of all; wealth acquired legitimately is stewarded for His purposes. • Spiritual warfare entails removing influences that entice toward idolatry (2 Corinthians 10:5). • Victory should culminate in worship and generosity, not self-indulgence. • God’s past judgments authenticate His future promise of final justice and salvation through the risen Christ alone. Thus God commanded Israel to take Midian’s spoils as an act of righteous judgment, covenant provision, ritual sanctification, and redemptive foreshadowing—all recorded reliably for our instruction and for the glory of the Creator-Redeemer. |
    |