Why does Jesus use a parable in response to Simon in Luke 7:40? Literary Placement and Narrative Flow Luke 7:36-50 records a dinner in the home of “a Pharisee named Simon” (v. 40). A woman “who had lived a sinful life” anoints Jesus’ feet, weeping, wiping them with her hair, kissing them, and pouring perfume (vv. 37-38). Simon silently judges both the woman and Jesus (v. 39). Luke’s careful sequencing—inner thought first, then Jesus’ spoken response—creates the ideal setting for a parable designed to expose the Pharisee’s heart while preserving the woman’s dignity. Parable Defined: Two Debtors (Luke 7:41-42) “A moneylender had two debtors: one owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty. When neither could repay him, he forgave both. Which of them will love him more?” . The story hinges on equal inability (“neither could repay”) and unequal gratitude proportionate to perceived forgiveness. Didactic Objectives of the Parable 1. Confrontational Grace. By employing a story Simon must evaluate, Jesus leads the Pharisee to indict himself (cf. Nathan’s parable to David, 2 Samuel 12:1-7). 2. Safe Exposure. Simon can face his error without public humiliation of direct accusation; the woman remains unrebuked, and the dinner milieu remains intact. 3. Cognitive Engagement. Parables require reflection, fostering internalization rather than mere compliance (cf. Luke 8:10). Simon is drawn into active reasoning rather than passive listening. 4. Reversal of Expectations. The parable prepares the hearer for Jesus’ declaration: “Her many sins have been forgiven—for she loved much. But he who is forgiven little loves little” (Luke 7:47). 5. Universal Application. A brief narrative transcends culture, allowing Luke’s Gentile audience—and modern readers—to grasp the principle of grace proportionate to awareness of sin. Cultural and Behavioral Dynamics First-century hospitality demanded water for feet, a kiss of greeting, and oil for the head (vv. 44-46). Simon’s omissions exhibit social slight and theological blindness. The parable addresses his failure in both etiquette and spiritual perception, turning cultural norms into moral indictments. Revealing Hearts, Concealing Truth from the Proud Jesus routinely uses parables to unveil truth to the humble while obscuring it from the hard-hearted (Luke 10:21; 18:9-14). Simon’s intellectual assent (“Teacher, say it”) contrasts the woman’s embodied devotion. The parable simultaneously illuminates her faith and exposes his self-righteousness. Old Testament Resonances Forgiveness as canceling debt echoes Deuteronomy 15:1-2 and the Year of Release, linking Jesus to Yahweh’s liberation ethic. The parallel with Nathan’s lamb parable further roots Jesus’ method in prophetic tradition, affirming canonical unity. Theological Emphasis on Justification by Grace The parable makes clear that neither debtor earns cancellation; forgiveness originates solely from the creditor’s mercy, prefiguring Pauline soteriology (Romans 3:24). Jesus’ final pronouncement, “Your faith has saved you; go in peace” (Luke 7:50), shifts focus from ritual to relational faith. Pastoral and Missional Application Believers are warned against Simon-like judgmentalism; seekers are invited to recognize their spiritual bankruptcy. The parable remains a timeless evangelistic tool: exposing sin gently, leading to gratitude-driven love for Christ. Conclusion Jesus employs the parable in Luke 7:40 to lay bare Simon’s concealed self-righteousness, elevate the repentant woman, and illustrate the unearned magnitude of divine forgiveness. By wrapping eternal truth in a brief, culturally resonant story, He invites every hearer—then and now—to measure love by forgiveness received and to find salvation in Him alone. |
    |