Why was Aaron chosen as priest?
Why was Aaron chosen for priesthood in Exodus 40:13, and what does it symbolize?

Exodus 40:13—Text

“Then put the holy garments on Aaron, anoint him and consecrate him, so that he may serve Me as priest.”


Historical Context of Aaron’s Appointment

Aaron, the older brother of Moses (Exodus 7:7), descends from Levi (Exodus 6:16–20). The tribe of Levi had already distinguished itself for loyalty when it rallied to Moses after the golden calf incident (Exodus 32:26–29). Yet Aaron, though implicated in that failure (Exodus 32:1–6), is still chosen. This underscores that priesthood is grounded in God’s sovereign grace rather than flawless human merit (cf. Romans 9:15–16).


Divine Sovereignty in Choosing a Mediator

Scripture never portrays the priesthood as won by vote or human self-nomination. Numbers 16:5 summarizes the principle: “The LORD will show who is His.” Hebrews 5:4 affirms the same pattern: “No one takes this honor upon himself; he must be called by God.” Aaron’s calling, therefore, serves as an early canonical witness to the doctrine of divine election.


Priesthood as Covenant Extension of God’s Firstborn Principle

Israel is called God’s “firstborn son” (Exodus 4:22). The priests represent the nation—especially its firstborn—before God (Numbers 3:12–13). Aaron, as head of the Levitical priests, personifies Israel’s corporate sonship. His priesthood is thus a living symbol of substitutionary representation, preparing the way for the ultimate Firstborn, Christ (Colossians 1:15, Hebrews 12:23).


Consecration Ritual and Its Symbolism

1. Robing (“put the holy garments on Aaron”)—symbolizes imputed righteousness (Isaiah 61:10).

2. Anointing with oil—foreshadows the Holy Spirit’s empowerment (1 Samuel 16:13; Acts 10:38). Oil running down Aaron’s beard (Psalm 133:2) later becomes a picture of unity flowing from God’s ordained mediator.

3. Consecration (“fill his hands,” Exodus 28:41 literal)—Aaron’s hands are filled with sacrificial portions, picturing total dedication to divine service (Romans 12:1).


Priestly Garments as Didactic Typology

• Ephod of gold, blue, purple, scarlet, and fine linen—heaven meeting earth in Christ’s incarnation (John 1:14).

• Breastpiece with twelve stones—continuous intercession for the tribes, echoed in Christ’s high-priestly prayer (John 17).

• Turban inscription “Holy to the LORD” (Exodus 28:36–38)—Christ’s perfect holiness applied to the believer (2 Corinthians 5:21).

• Bells and pomegranates—sound and fruit together portray proclamation and Spirit-borne character (Galatians 5:22–23).


Mediator of Atonement

Leviticus 16 details Aaron’s Day of Atonement duties, climaxing in blood sprinkled on the mercy seat. Hebrews 9:11–12 explicitly links this to Christ, who entered “the greater and more perfect tabernacle … by His own blood, having obtained eternal redemption.” Thus Aaron’s role is prophetic drama pointing to the once-for-all substitutionary work of Jesus.


Symbol of Separation and Holiness

Aaron is “set apart” (Numbers 16:9). This separation teaches that access to God demands sanctity, anticipating 1 Peter 1:16, “Be holy, because I am holy.” Behavioral science confirms that symbolic boundary markers (uniforms, rituals) reinforce group identity; God employs these cognitive triggers to teach holiness experientially.


Archaeological and Manuscript Corroboration

• Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (7th–6th century BC) preserve the priestly blessing of Numbers 6:24–26, demonstrating that Aaronic liturgy was already authoritative centuries before Christ.

• 4QExodᵇ (Dead Sea Scrolls, 2nd century BC) contains Exodus 40, showing textual stability long prior to the Masoretic tradition.

• Elephantine papyri (5th century BC) mention a functioning Jewish temple and priesthood in Egypt, corroborating an entrenched Aaronic practice beyond the land.

Such finds, verified by paleography and radiocarbon dating, align with the young-earth chronological window consistent with a c. 15th-century BC Exodus, underscoring Scripture’s historical reliability.


Christological Fulfillment

Hebrews 4–10 identifies Jesus as the better Aaron:

• Superior pedigree—“a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek” (Hebrews 7:17).

• Superior sacrifice—Himself, not animals (Hebrews 9:26).

• Superior access—veil torn (Matthew 27:51).

Aaron’s temporary priesthood is therefore typological, not ultimate.


Ecclesiological Implications

Believers, united to Christ, become “a royal priesthood” (1 Peter 2:9). The exclusivity of Aaron’s line teaches that access to God is still exclusive—now through Christ alone (John 14:6)—yet universally offered to all who believe (Revelation 5:9–10).


Missional and Evangelistic Lesson

Aaron’s flawed history coupled with divine commissioning illustrates that salvation and service are by grace. The same God who repurposed Aaron transforms sinners today, validating the gospel’s power (2 Corinthians 5:17). Every Christian, clothed in Christ’s righteousness, is sent to bless the nations with the priestly benediction (Numbers 6:24–26).


Summary

Aaron is chosen because God, in sovereign grace, appoints a mediator to embody holiness, bear the people’s names, and foreshadow the perfect High Priest, Jesus Christ. His priesthood symbolizes substitution, atonement, holiness, and divine election—truths historically grounded, textually preserved, archaeologically attested, and ultimately fulfilled in the risen Son of God.

How does Exodus 40:13 reflect the concept of holiness in the Bible?
Top of Page
Top of Page