Why did Moses act as judge for the people in Exodus 18:15? Immediate Context (Exodus 18:13-16) Israel has just been delivered from Egypt, received water, manna, and victory over Amalek, but has not yet arrived at Sinai to receive the codified law (Exodus 19). Daily life therefore turns on Moses’ personal access to Yahweh. In that gap between Egypt and Sinai, the people “stand around” him “from morning till evening” (v. 14), evidencing both their hunger for guidance and his singular role. Divine Commission of Moses At the burning bush Yahweh said, “I will send you to Pharaoh… When you have brought the people out of Egypt, you will worship God on this mountain” (Exodus 3:10-12). That commission did not end with the Exodus; it included shepherding the nation until worship at Sinai was fully ordered. Numbers 12:7-8 affirms that Yahweh speaks with Moses “face to face,” qualifying him uniquely to render judgments grounded in divine revelation rather than human opinion. Mediator Between Yahweh and Israel Exodus 20:19 records the people’s fear of direct contact with God and their request that Moses speak on their behalf. Even before the Ten Commandments, this mediatorial role was functional: Moses consults the LORD (Exodus 18:19) and transmits His decisions. Scripture later applies the same pattern to Christ, “the one mediator between God and men” (1 Timothy 2:5). Educational Function: Teaching Statutes and Laws Beyond verdicts, Moses “makes known to them the statutes of God and His laws” (Exodus 18:16). The judging sessions double as catechesis, preparing Israel to receive the written Torah. The Hebrew word torah itself means “instruction.” Moses is not merely arbitrating disputes; he is forming a people governed by revealed righteousness. Formation of National Identity and Covenant Order Abram’s family has now swollen to a nation of perhaps two million (cf. Exodus 12:37). A slave multitude must be molded into a theocratic community. By judging, Moses instills a shared moral code that distinguishes Israel from surrounding pagan cultures such as the Midianites and Amalekites whose law codes were fluid and polytheistic. Absence of Established Judiciary During Wilderness Sojourn No elders’ court, Levitical priesthood, or written law yet operates. In ANE cultures like Egypt, the pharaoh embodied both civil and religious authority; Israel similarly looks to its deliverer. Moses’ temporary monopolization of judgment reflects necessity, not divine preference, which is why Jethro’s counsel to delegate is welcomed and enacted (Exodus 18:24-26). Pastoral Care and Dispute Resolution Sin disrupts relationships; justice restores shalom. By hearing each case, Moses models pastoral concern, reinforcing that Yahweh values each individual grievance. The spontaneous line “from morning till evening” underscores an ethic of servant-leadership later epitomized by Christ washing feet (John 13:1-17). Foreshadowing of Christ as Ultimate Mediator and Judge Acts 3:22 cites Deuteronomy 18:15: “The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your brothers.” Moses’ judging office previews the eschatological Judge who will decisively reveal God’s will and execute perfect justice (John 5:22-27; Revelation 20:11-15). Relation to Later Mosaic Judicial Delegation Deuteronomy 1:9-18 recounts the same event, confirming internal consistency across Pentateuchal texts. The delegation of qualified, God-fearing men establishes case law hierarchy—minor cases to officials, major cases to Moses—mirrored later in Israel’s elders, tribal leaders, and Sanhedrin. Modern jurisprudence’s appellate structure finds its prototype here. Theological Implications 1. God’s revelation is necessary for righteous judgment (Psalm 19:7-9). 2. Leadership is service directed toward God’s glory and communal good. 3. Human systems of justice must continually appeal to transcendent moral standards. Historical and Cultural Background Tablets such as the Code of Hammurabi (18th c. BC) show ancient Near Eastern concern for law, but only Israel’s law roots itself in a covenant with a single, moral Creator. Archaeological layers at Kadesh-barnea and Timna corroborate nomadic occupation matching the Exodus itinerary, supporting the plausibility of a large encampment requiring judicial order. Archaeological Corroboration • The Merneptah Stele (1210 BC) names “Israel” in Canaan shortly after the proposed Exodus window, situating the nation historically. • Sinai’s geographical markers—Jebel Maqla’s charred summit, split-rock water evidence at Rephidim—match Exodus’ descriptions, placing Moses’ judging activity in verifiable settings. Application for Contemporary Believers 1. Seek God’s will first; human wisdom is inadequate. 2. Leaders must balance authority with teachability and delegation. 3. Every community benefits when disputes are resolved under God-given principles. Conclusion Moses acted as judge because he alone, at that stage, possessed direct revelation from Yahweh, was divinely appointed mediator, needed to instruct a nascent nation in God’s statutes, and had not yet established subordinate judges. His role safeguards covenant fidelity, prefigures Christ’s mediatorial office, and models servant-leadership grounded in revealed truth. |
    |