How does Judas's betrayal fit free will?
John 6:70–71: How does Jesus’s foreknowledge of Judas’s betrayal reconcile with the concept of free will and God’s omniscience?

I. The Scriptural Context

John 6:70–71 states: “Jesus answered them, ‘Have I not chosen you, the Twelve? Yet one of you is a devil!’ He was speaking about Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. For although Judas was one of the Twelve, he was later to betray Jesus.” This passage underscores Jesus’s clear awareness of Judas’s impending betrayal long before it occurred. While this raises questions about free will, the broader context of Scripture affirms that both God’s omniscience and genuine human responsibility coexist.

II. Divine Omniscience Defined

Scripture consistently portrays God as knowing all things, including future events (Isaiah 46:9–10). Jesus, being fully divine (John 1:1–2; John 10:30), shares this omniscience, exemplified here by His advance knowledge of events that would unfold (cf. Psalm 139:4). The foreknowledge seen in John 6:70–71 reflects an eternal perspective that transcends time. God is not constrained by temporal developments; He comprehends eternity past, present, and future simultaneously (cf. 2 Peter 3:8).

III. The Reality of Free Will

Although God foreknows choices and outcomes, Scripture maintains that human beings make genuine moral decisions (Joshua 24:15; Proverbs 16:9). Judas’s act of betrayal is consistently presented as his own choice, rooted in personal motives that aligned with temptation (Luke 22:3–6). In John 13:27, the text notes that Satan entered Judas, yet there remains a clear indication that Judas allowed this influence, bearing responsibility for his actions.

IV. Judas’s Intent and Accountability

Throughout the Gospels, Judas willingly participates in the betrayal. Even at the Last Supper (John 13:26–30), Jesus extends opportunities for repentance, but Judas proceeds with his plan. His remorse later (Matthew 27:3–5) further highlights that Judas was not coerced into sin; rather, he acted out of greed (John 12:6), aligned with prophetic fulfillment (Psalm 41:9), which demonstrated the harmony of divine prophecy and human agency.

V. Reconciling Divine Omniscience and Human Freedom

1. Foreknowledge vs. Causation: Having prior knowledge of a future event is not the same as causing it. God’s omniscience does not force or predetermine human decisions; rather, it recognizes them.

2. Outside of Time: God’s perspective stands outside the linear timeline, seeing all events as present reality. This does not negate free will but clarifies how God knows what will occur without compelling it.

3. Prophecy as a Window: Passages such as Zechariah 11:12–13 or Psalm 41:9 highlight divine foretelling. These prophecies point to what will happen but do not rob individuals of responsibility. Instead, they illustrate God’s orchestration of redemption while preserving human choice.

VI. Additional Scriptural Witness

Acts 2:23: Peter declares that Jesus’s crucifixion happened “by God’s set plan and foreknowledge,” yet it was carried out by those who were “wicked,” holding them accountable.

Romans 9:18–21: While emphasizing divine sovereignty, the text also maintains that humans are responsible for their decisions.

Psalm 94:9–11: Affirms that the One who created the eye and ear knows the thoughts of mankind, reaffirming both God’s intimate knowledge and mankind’s accountability.

VII. Historical and Philosophical Considerations

Archaeological discoveries, such as the John Rylands Papyrus (P52), attest to the early circulation of the Gospel of John, giving credence to its accurate preservation. These findings support the integrity of the text reporting Jesus’s foreknowledge of Judas’s betrayal. Philosophically, the distinction between “knowledge” and “deterministic causation” is a long-recognized principle: knowing an event will occur does not entail forcing the event.

Additionally, ancient extrabiblical writings (e.g., the writings of early Church Fathers like Irenaeus in “Against Heresies”) affirm the biblical narrative and the consistent teaching that Judas was responsible for his own betrayal, reflecting a Christian consensus on this union of divine omniscience and human choice.

VIII. Conclusion

John 6:70–71 vividly shows that Jesus was not surprised by Judas’s betrayal; He knew it in advance. Yet Judas acted of his own accord, fulfilling prophecy without sacrificing personal responsibility. This tension between God’s absolute foreknowledge and genuine human will aligns with the broader teaching of Scripture: God freely accomplishes His redemptive plan while individuals make real choices for which they remain accountable.

In this passage, and throughout Scripture, the harmony of divine omniscience and human free will demonstrates the power and sovereignty of God—a God who knows each person’s heart yet calls all to respond, placing the profound significance of chosen obedience or rejection upon our shoulders.

Interpret 'eat flesh, drink blood' command?
Top of Page
Top of Page