Galatians 2:2 – How can we verify Paul’s claim of going “by revelation” to meet the apostles when there is no concrete external evidence for such an event? Galatians 2:2 in Focus “I went up in response to a revelation and set before them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. But I spoke privately to those recognized as leaders, for fear that I was running or had already run in vain.” (Galatians 2:2) The apostle Paul’s statement that he went to meet with the apostles “by revelation” raises a question: How can we verify this claim when there is no direct external evidence for such a personal revelation? The following sections provide an exhaustive view of how the biblical text, historical context, and complementary Scriptural passages support Paul’s assertion, along with common considerations from church history and scholarship. 1. The Scriptural Context and Internal Consistency The immediate context of Galatians 2:2 is integral to understanding Paul’s journey. In Galatians 1:11–12, Paul emphasizes that “the gospel I preach is not devised by man. I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.” By the time he references going “by revelation” in Galatians 2:2, he has already laid out a framework that his apostolic call came from God directly. Furthermore, Paul’s autobiography in Galatians 1:17–24 tracks multiple travels and timing markers: • He went to Arabia and then back to Damascus. • Three years later, he visited Jerusalem to see Peter and stayed with him for fifteen days (Galatians 1:18–19). • Then he mentions another span of time before he again went up to Jerusalem, this time “by revelation” (Galatians 2:1–2). This internal consistency across Galatians chapters 1 and 2 demonstrates a coherent timeline and an interlinked message—Paul is establishing that his gospel message and his reasons for traveling to Jerusalem came directly from divine guidance. The text shows no contradiction and, in fact, underscores one of Paul’s major themes: his apostleship is grounded in a direct commission from Christ, not in human tradition (Galatians 1:1). 2. The Broader Scriptural Record (Acts 15 and Related Passages) Acts 15 provides a narrative of the so-called “Council of Jerusalem,” where Paul and Barnabas met with the apostles and elders regarding Gentile believers. Although Acts 15:2 does not explicitly say that Paul went “by revelation,” it does record that Paul and Barnabas were “appointed” by the church in Antioch to go up to Jerusalem. This does not contradict Paul’s statement in Galatians 2:2; rather, it offers additional perspective that the church also affirmed the necessity of this meeting. When combined, Galatians 2 and Acts 15 detail a pivotal point in the early community of believers—addressing whether Gentile converts needed to abide by Jewish customs. Paul explains that the meeting ensued at the prompting of divine revelation, while Acts indicates the practical outworking of that meeting among Antioch’s believers. The two accounts work in harmony: what Paul interprets as direct divine instruction was also interpreted by the larger church body as vital and necessary for the unity of believers. 3. The Nature of “No Concrete External Evidence” It is true that there is no archaeological tablet or outside secular document explicitly stating, “Paul went up to Jerusalem by revelation.” However, an event that was primarily experiential—God personally moving Paul—would not typically leave the same kind of external trace as a public decree. Moreover, the ancient world did not record private motivations as often as official events. The preserved historical references (e.g., Josephus, Tacitus, Roman archives) generally cover large political or military developments. A believer’s private revelation from God, even while historically impacting the church, is less likely to appear in mainstream Roman or Jewish records of the time. 4. Reliability of Paul’s Letters Within Early Christianity Paul planted numerous churches, and his letters circulated widely among these congregations and beyond (cf. Colossians 4:16). Early Christian communities—who had access to eyewitnesses of Christ and close contact with the apostles—regarded Paul’s writings as authoritative. • Ignatius of Antioch (c. AD 35–108), in some of his letters, shows familiarity with Pauline theology and regards it highly. • Polycarp (c. AD 69–155), in his letter to the Philippians, references Pauline writings as well. • Irenaeus (c. AD 130–202) cites Paul’s epistles as Scripture. The uniform reception of Paul’s epistles by early Christian leaders who were in a position to verify at least the broad strokes of his ministry lends substantial weight to the authenticity of his claims. If Paul’s private revelation trip had been factually inaccurate, early Christian witnesses would have raised concerns, especially given the personal stakes of the Judaizing controversy he addresses in Galatians. 5. The Personal Dimension of Revelation Scripture itself frequently presents revelation as a personal interaction between God and believers: • Abraham’s call in Genesis 12:1–4. • The calling of the prophet Samuel in 1 Samuel 3:1–10. • Peter’s vision about Cornelius in Acts 10:9–16. None of these personal encounters is “externally verifiable” in the sense of a surviving Roman edict or artifact. Yet they are consistent with the biblical pattern of God directly guiding His chosen servants. Paul’s personal revelatory experience squares well with this pattern, aligning with the overall biblical witness to God’s direct intervention in individuals’ lives. 6. Cross-Referencing Paul’s Motive and Character Paul’s overarching motivation, as seen throughout his letters, is proclaiming Christ crucified and risen (1 Corinthians 2:2; Galatians 6:14). He consistently puts forth that his apostolic authority was derived from God, and he values honesty among the believers (2 Corinthians 4:2). His willingness to confront influential figures (Galatians 2:11 on Peter) indicates a commitment to truth rather than to a merely pleasing narrative. In essence, a forged reason to go to Jerusalem—claiming “by revelation” when it was merely personal ambition or political maneuver—would conflict with what is otherwise a prominent characteristic of integrity in Paul’s letters. As a champion of truth even when unpopular, Paul’s reliability is intertwined with his message. 7. Summary of Supporting Points • Internal Consistency of Galatians – Paul’s own timeline and reasoning reflect a coherent narrative, culminating in his mention of revelation. • Complementary Accounts in Acts – Acts 15 corroborates key aspects of Paul’s Jerusalem visit, even if it does not specify the revelation. • Historical Church Acceptance – Early church fathers accepted Paul’s letters’ authenticity and authority. • Biblical Pattern of Revelation – Scripture repeatedly records personal revelations that do not come with external “documentation,” yet they fit the broader biblical narrative of God revealing His will. • Paul’s Character – His transparent and direct approach in addressing controversies supports the credibility of his claims. 8. Conclusion Although one cannot stand outside Paul’s subjective experience and point to a secular record that states “Paul traveled to Jerusalem by revelation,” the biblical text offers a strong internal confirmation. Galatians 2:2 can be verified to the extent that both Scripture and the early church community harmonize with Paul’s claim. Acts 15 affirms the broader contours of this visit, and Paul’s message across his epistles provides a consistent portrayal of a man driven by divine calling rather than human contrivance. For many historical events—particularly those involving personal, spiritual encounters—documentation beyond Scriptural testimony can be scarce. However, the consistency of Paul’s letters, the corroboration of Acts, and the witness of the early church all provide a logical and trustworthy framework. This cluster of evidence upholds not only Paul’s words in Galatians 2:2 but also the reliability and continuity of the New Testament record as a whole. |
    |