Is revenge acceptable? (Leviticus 24:19-20 vs. Matthew 5:39) Overview of the Concept of Revenge Revenge, the act of returning harm for harm, appears prominently throughout biblical writings. On one hand, Leviticus 24:19–20 reads, “If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him: fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. Just as he injured the other person, the same must be inflicted on him.” On the other hand, in Matthew 5:39, Jesus declares, “But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also.” These statements may appear contradictory at first glance, yet they reflect a cohesive revelation of divine justice and mercy when examined within the broader biblical framework. The subject of revenge entails not only a careful look at the immediate context of Old Testament law and New Testament teaching but also an understanding of the heart transformation that Scripture consistently calls believers to embrace. Leviticus 24:19–20 in Historical Perspective Leviticus 24:19–20 is part of the Mosaic Law given to ancient Israel during their wilderness journey after the exodus from Egypt. The phrase “eye for eye” functioned to set boundaries for justice rather than encourage personal vendettas. In the ancient Near Eastern context, disproportionate retribution was common, sometimes punishing a minor offense with extreme retaliation. The instruction in Leviticus served to regulate and limit vengeance, making the penalty correspond strictly to the offense. Moreover, this legal standard was meant for communal order, administered by proper authorities rather than left to impulsive acts by individuals. Archaeological records, such as portions of the Dead Sea Scrolls (the Temple Scroll) and references in extra-biblical legal texts (e.g., the Code of Hammurabi), attest that laws requiring punishments to fit the crime were integral to maintaining public justice. These legal structures counteracted arbitrary or vigilante revenge and provided a standardized means of restitution. Matthew 5:39 and the Teachings of Christ In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus addresses the heart attitude rather than overturning the moral foundation established in the Old Testament. Matthew 5:39 states: “But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also.” Far from dismissing the concept of justice, Jesus deepens it by commanding His followers to relinquish personal retaliation, demonstrating a radical love modeled after God’s own mercy. This teaching aligns with the overarching biblical narrative that God alone is the ultimate judge and avenger (see Romans 12:19, “Vengeance is Mine; I will repay,” says the Lord). Jesus emphasizes self-control, love for enemies, and a trust in God’s perfect justice—an approach that was revolutionary in both Jewish and Greco-Roman settings in the first century. Early church writings, including those from Church Fathers such as Tertullian and Origen, highlight that the belief in forgiving one’s enemies and taking no personal revenge was a hallmark of the early Christian community. Reconciling the Two Passages 1. Purpose of the Mosaic Law Leviticus 24:19–20 establishes a judicial principle for an ancient theocratic society, instructing civil authorities to implement punishments commensurate with offenses. The goal was societal justice, not individual vendettas. 2. Christ’s Fulfillment of the Law Jesus, in Matthew 5:17, said He came not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it. By instructing individuals to relinquish revenge, Jesus directs the application of God’s Law from external regulation (civil or communal) toward internal transformation (personal conduct and heart attitude). 3. Ultimate Accountability Scripture consistently teaches God’s sovereignty in executing justice: “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay” (Deuteronomy 32:35). Believers are called to trust divine retribution rather than seek to administer it themselves. Thus, the differences between Leviticus 24:19–20 and Matthew 5:39 become complementary rather than incompatible. Under the Mosaic covenant, legal recourse protected society from escalating retribution. Under the new covenant in Christ, God's people observe not only justice but also grace, choosing forgiveness over retaliation and illustrating God’s character to the world. Biblical Concept of Vengeance in Wider Scripture 1. Old Testament Examples Numerous passages in the Old Testament reveal the pitfalls of personal revenge. Proverbs 20:22 warns, “Do not say, ‘I will avenge this evil!’ Wait on the LORD, and He will save you.” Personal revenge often spirals into further conflict, while depending on God fosters integrity and peace. 2. New Testament Admonitions Romans 12:17–21 underlines the command to “repay no one evil for evil” and instead actively do good. The entire New Testament ethic urges believers to respond to conflict and wrongdoing with a love that reflects God’s grace, thereby overcoming evil with good. 3. Spiritual Transformation The call for believers is to be inwardly transformed through the Holy Spirit, so that they mirror Jesus’ forgiveness—even in the face of grave injustice. This spiritual transformation transcends natural human inclinations to retaliate. Behavioral Insights and Practical Outlook From the perspective of behavioral science, exacting revenge frequently leads to prolonged cycles of hostility and psychological stress, rather than closure or healing. Resentment can linger, harming both the avenger and the offender. When commands like those in Matthew 5:39 are heeded, individuals often experience healthier emotional outcomes such as reduced anger and a greater sense of peace. Practically, this teaching does not negate civil justice systems or undermine the rule of law. Rather, it addresses an individual’s posture of heart. Individuals refrain from harboring vengeance in daily life, while governments and legal institutions still bear responsibility for maintaining public order. Archaeological and Manuscript Evidence 1. Old Testament Reliability Discoveries such as the Dead Sea Scrolls (dated as early as the third century BC) include fragments of Leviticus, demonstrating remarkable textual consistency across centuries. These findings confirm that the instruction of “eye for eye” stands historically verified and doctrinally integral. 2. New Testament Reliability Early Greek papyri, including manuscripts from the second century AD, affirm the integrity of Jesus’ teachings recorded in the Gospel of Matthew. Scholars such as Dr. James White and Dr. Dan Wallace have cataloged thousands of manuscript copies, with the textual variants not affecting core doctrines like non-retaliation in Matthew 5:39. 3. Supporting Historical Context The customs surrounding how society enacted legal penalties show that the biblical laws were grounded in real-world practices of the era. Furthermore, early Christian sources and external writings (like Josephus’ accounts discussing Jewish legal processes) confirm that “eye for eye” shaped community justice under the Old Covenant, whereas Jesus’ radical instruction to “turn the other cheek” marked the New Covenant ethic. Conclusion: Is Revenge Acceptable? When examined in full biblical context, revenge is neither recommended nor condoned as a personal response to wrongdoing. In Leviticus 24:19–20, the principle of “eye for eye” functioned within an official legal system to ensure fairness and prevent escalating hostilities among ancient Israelites. It was never given as a license for individuals to act brutally or vindictively. In the New Testament, Jesus calls believers to reach beyond the letter of the law, adopting an attitude of forgiveness and relinquishing the right to personal retribution. This mandate arises from trust in God’s ultimate justice and a commitment to reflect His love. Scripture, historical evidence, and practical experience confirm that harboring or acting on revenge does not foster true peace; rather, the transformative work is in trusting God to address wrongs. From Genesis to Revelation, the overarching message is that vengeance properly belongs to God, while believers are urged to promote peace, mercy, and love, hence demonstrating the character of the One who said, “Turn the other also.” |
    |