Why attribute Psalm 71 to David?
If David is traditionally credited with many psalms, what is the historical basis for attributing Psalm 71 to him, given conflicting scholarly claims about authorship?

Historical Context and Traditional Claims

Psalm 71 does not include a direct superscription naming its author. Nevertheless, a strong tradition has connected it to David. Ancient references and liturgical use have often placed Psalm 71 among the “Davidic” collection, primarily because many early Jewish and Christian communities recognized thematic and linguistic parallels between this psalm and others that explicitly bear David’s name. The Septuagint (the ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible) places Psalm 71 near several psalms attributed to David, although it does not provide a heading labeling David as the author here.

As time passed, commentators—both Jewish and early Christian—noticed this psalm’s echoes of David’s later years. The Targum (an ancient Aramaic translation and commentary) and rabbinic writings sometimes identify David’s voice in this psalm, connecting it with a period of his advanced age, as the text references gray hair (see verse 18). While these sources are not always unanimous, their respect for a Davidic authorship underscores a long-standing belief that the psalm reflects David’s experiences.

Internal Linguistic and Thematic Clues

1. Similar Phrasing to Recognized Davidic Psalms

Psalm 71 shares word choice, style, and imagery with psalms explicitly designated as “of David.” For instance, the language of trust in God from youth to old age resembles themes in Psalm 22 and Psalm 37, both assigned to David according to their superscriptions. Scholars supporting Davidic authorship point to parallels like the prayer for deliverance and the plea for God’s constant help.

2. References to Lifelong Reliance on God

Verse 17 states, “O God, You have taught me from my youth.” Though well under 90 characters, this allusion to a life spent in communion with the Lord is reminiscent of David’s life narrative, as he is introduced in Scripture as a young shepherd who relied on God. Many see this continuity of lifelong reliance as highly evocative of David’s spiritual walk from his time tending sheep, through his anointing as king, and into his later trials.

3. Allusions to Old Age and Ongoing Danger

Verse 18 includes the line, “Now that I am old and gray, do not forsake me.” This resonates with a season in David’s life when his vitality was waning, yet he still faced threats (see 2 Samuel 15–18 for David’s struggles late in his reign). Scholars who favor Davidic authorship see these lines as a snapshot of David’s later mindset, perhaps recalling crises such as Absalom’s rebellion.

4. Shared Devotional Expressions

Psalm 71 expresses confident praise balanced by desperate pleas for God’s help, a hallmark of David’s poetic style in other psalms (e.g., Psalms 3, 4, 62). In particular, the repeated call for refuge, the request for God to listen, and the hymn-like conclusion reflect a well-established pattern found in the Davidic corpus.

Manuscript Evidence and Ancient Versions

1. Masoretic Text

The Hebrew manuscripts forming the Masoretic Text do not supply a superscription for Psalm 71. However, the scribal tradition organizes many of the psalms by known or presumed authors. Although Psalm 71 stands without a title, its position near acknowledged Davidic psalms (notably Psalm 70, which includes “of David” in the superscription) fuels the view that Psalm 71 could have been intended as a continuation or expansion of a Davidic theme.

2. Dead Sea Scrolls

Portions of the Psalms were discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls, dating as early or earlier than the first century BC. While some fragments represent alternative arrangements of the psalms, the references to David in other sections show that the community at Qumran regarded David as the primary composer of much of the Psalter. Psalm 71 fragments are sparse, though they confirm the text’s consistency with the Masoretic tradition. Although no heading for authorship is preserved, the textual match helps illustrate the psalm’s early acceptance within the Psalter as we have it today.

3. Septuagint and Other Early Translations

The Greek Septuagint arranges the psalms somewhat differently, yet Psalms 70 (71 MT) and 71 (72 MT) closely follow recognized Davidic psalms. Even if the Greek translators did not affix “of David” here, the proximity to Davidic material suggests continuity. Later translations, such as the Latin Vulgate and the Syriac Peshitta, reflect that same grouping, maintaining a connection in the broader Davidic collection.

Historical Arguments Against Davidic Authorship

1. Lack of Superscription

Some argue that because Psalm 71 does not specifically name David, the case for attributing it to him might rest purely on tradition. These scholars highlight the possibility that the psalm was composed much later, after Israel’s exile, in a style imitating Davidic language.

2. Generalized Language

The references to enemies, advanced age, and continued reliance on God could, in theory, apply to any devout individual facing persecution in later life. Critics note that the absence of direct mention of events from David’s monarchy might indicate a later composition meant for community worship rather than a single royal figure.

3. Theological Motifs Suited to Post-Exilic Context

Some interpret certain lines about personal deliverance as reflecting a communal post-exilic prayer setting. While many reject this hypothesis, it remains a mainstay of higher-critical analysis.

The Strength of the Davidic Tradition

Despite these counterarguments, the historical weight behind Davidic authorship remains influential. Early Jewish writings and many Christian commentators for centuries deemed it Davidic in tone, style, and theological emphasis. Moreover, the psalmist’s reflections on youth, older age, and God’s lifelong faithfulness align comfortably with David’s known life stages.

Additionally, the overall consistency of the Psalter’s arrangement and the widespread attribution to David from ancient worship materials suggest that certain unnamed psalms might still be David’s work. Even though Psalm 71 lacks a superscription, these contextual and linguistic clues bolster the case for David’s authorship.

Archaeological and Historical Corroborations

1. Literary Culture of Ancient Israel

Inscriptions from the area near Tel Dan and the Mesha Stele (though they do not quote psalms) attest to the established practice of royal and religious poetry in the same era traditionally linked with David. These discoveries support the historical likelihood that a king such as David would produce numeric songs and prayers.

2. Continuity in Song and Worship

Archaeological evidence of organized worship in the First Temple period indicates that Davidic psalms were central to Israel’s liturgical life. The subscription “Of David” often signified not only authorship but also a recognized, authoritative voice for communal praise. While Psalm 71 does not bear that label, its fluid integration in the worship life of Israel suggests an origin of equal gravitas.

Conclusion and Significance

The historical basis for attributing Psalm 71 to David rests on early tradition, consistent thematic parallels with other psalms bearing David’s name, and the psalm’s strong depiction of youthful beginnings and aged reliance on God—hallmarks easily aligned with David’s biography. Although modern scholarship has offered alternative theories, the long-held Davidic view remains compelling, given the psalm’s similarities in style, language, and motif with clearly Davidic compositions.

Moreover, ancient manuscript traditions and longstanding worship practices reinforce the likelihood that Psalm 71 was understood by generations of believers as part of David’s collection. While the psalm’s exact historical details are not fully spelled out, the convergence of internal evidence and external testimonies provides a meaningful case for ascribing it to Israel’s poet-king, whose legacy of faith and reliance on divine deliverance still resonates in this prayerful text.

Ultimately, as with much of the Psalter, Psalm 71 transcends the question of authorship by testifying to trust in God’s steadfast care from youth through old age. It has encouraged generations to remain confident in divine help, echoing themes that David’s life so profoundly illustrated.

Why little evidence for Psalm 71 events?
Top of Page
Top of Page