The incident involving the confiscation of Mephibosheth's property by King David is a significant event recorded in the Old Testament, specifically in the books of 2 Samuel. This event highlights themes of loyalty, justice, and the complexities of royal decisions in ancient Israel.

Background

Mephibosheth was the son of Jonathan and the grandson of King Saul. Following the death of Saul and Jonathan, David ascended to the throne of Israel. Despite the enmity between Saul and David, David sought to honor his covenant with Jonathan by showing kindness to his descendants. Mephibosheth, who was crippled in both feet, was brought to David's court, where David restored to him all the land that had belonged to Saul and allowed him to eat at the king's table continually (2 Samuel 9:7-13).

The Incident

The confiscation of Mephibosheth's property occurred during the rebellion of Absalom, David's son. As David fled Jerusalem to escape Absalom's uprising, Ziba, the servant of Mephibosheth, met David with provisions. Ziba claimed that Mephibosheth had stayed in Jerusalem, hoping that the kingdom of his grandfather Saul would be restored to him (2 Samuel 16:1-4). Based on Ziba's report, David granted all of Mephibosheth's property to Ziba.

Resolution

After Absalom's rebellion was quashed, David returned to Jerusalem. Mephibosheth went to meet the king, and it became apparent that he had not cared for his feet, trimmed his mustache, or washed his clothes since the day David left, indicating his mourning and loyalty to David (2 Samuel 19:24). Mephibosheth explained that Ziba had deceived him, as he was unable to saddle a donkey due to his disability, and Ziba had slandered him to the king (2 Samuel 19:26-27).

Faced with conflicting accounts, David decided to divide the land between Ziba and Mephibosheth. Mephibosheth, however, expressed contentment with David's safe return, indicating his loyalty and lack of concern for material wealth (2 Samuel 19:29-30).

Theological and Moral Implications

This narrative underscores the challenges of leadership and the potential for misjudgment. David's initial decision to confiscate Mephibosheth's property based on Ziba's report reflects the difficulties in discerning truth amidst political turmoil. The resolution, where David divides the property, suggests a pragmatic approach to justice, though it leaves the full truth somewhat unresolved.

Mephibosheth's response highlights a profound loyalty to David, prioritizing the king's well-being over personal gain. This attitude serves as a model of faithfulness and humility, virtues esteemed in the biblical tradition.

The account also illustrates the vulnerability of individuals with disabilities in ancient societies and the potential for their exploitation. David's eventual recognition of Mephibosheth's loyalty and his decision to allow him to continue eating at the king's table reaffirm the king's initial commitment to kindness and covenant loyalty.2 Samuel 16:4
Then said the king to Ziba, Behold, your are all that pertained to Mephibosheth. And Ziba said, I humbly beseech you that I may find grace in your sight, my lord, O king.
Nave's Topical Index

How can I find joy in the midst of trials? | GotQuestions.org

Confiscation: Dictionary and Thesaurus | Clyx.com

Bible Concordance • Bible Dictionary • Bible Encyclopedia • Topical Bible • Bible Thesuarus