1946. Epikoureios
Lexical Summary
Epikoureios: Epicurean

Original Word: Ἐπικουρεῖος
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: Epikoureios
Pronunciation: ep-ee-koo-RAY-os
Phonetic Spelling: (ep-ee-koo'-ri-os)
KJV: Epicurean
Word Origin: [from Epikouros (a noted philosopher)]

1. an Epicurean or follower of Epicurus

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
Epicurean.

From Epikouros (compare epikouria) (a noted philosopher); an Epicurean or follower of Epicurus -- Epicurean.

see GREEK epikouria

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 1946: Ἐπικούρειος

Ἐπικούρειος (Ἐπικουριος T WH; see Iota), Ἐπικουρειου, , Epicurean, belonging to the sect of Epicurus, the philosopher: Acts 17:18.

Topical Lexicon
Definition and Occurrence

Ἐπικουρείων designates the followers of the Greek philosopher Epicurus. The name appears once in the New Testament, Acts 17:18, where Luke reports that Epicurean and Stoic philosophers confronted Paul in Athens.

Historical Background of Epicurean Philosophy

Epicurus (341–270 BC) established his Garden in Athens about three centuries before Paul’s visit. His school taught that the universe arose by chance from atoms, that the gods (if they existed) were distant and uninvolved, and that the highest good was freedom from pain and anxiety. Pleasure, defined primarily as tranquility, became the guiding ethic. Epicureans rejected the immortality of the soul, divine judgment, and providential governance, cultivating instead a materialistic worldview that prized self-sufficiency and personal ease.

Epicureans in the New Testament Context

By the first century the Garden still operated, and Epicureans enjoyed influence in Athens, a city that “spent their time in nothing more than to hear or tell something new” (Acts 17:21). Luke’s notice that Epicurean philosophers disputed with Paul underscores the intellectual variety of that gathering on the Areopagus and signals the particular objections Paul’s gospel would face: disbelief in resurrection, skepticism toward divine intervention, and a worldview centered on temporal pleasure.

Theological Contrasts with Biblical Revelation

1. Doctrine of God: Epicureans considered the gods detached; Scripture presents a God who “gives everyone life and breath and everything else” (Acts 17:25).
2. Creation: Random atomic collisions versus “He Himself gives to all men life and breath” (Acts 17:25).
3. Providence: A disengaged cosmos versus “in Him we live and move and have our being” (Acts 17:28).
4. Future Hope: No afterlife versus the “assurance to all men by raising Him from the dead” (Acts 17:31).
5. Ethics: Pleasure as chief good versus holiness and love as reflections of God’s character (1 Peter 1:15–16).

Paul’s Evangelistic Approach in Athens

Paul neither ignored nor capitulated to Epicurean thought. He:
• Began with creation (Acts 17:24-26), countering materialism.
• Affirmed divine nearness (17:27) against Epicurean apathy.
• Quoted Greek poets (17:28) to bridge cultural distance.
• Confronted their denial of judgment and resurrection (17:30-31).

His respectful yet uncompromising proclamation offers a model for engaging philosophies hostile to biblical truth.

Legacy and Lessons for Contemporary Ministry

1. Worldview Awareness: Materialistic, pleasure-centered ideologies still dominate secular culture; the apostolic response remains relevant.
2. Common Ground Without Compromise: Paul’s citation of pagan poetry shows believers can employ cultural touchpoints while steering the conversation to Christ.
3. Centrality of the Resurrection: The climax of Paul’s message directly opposed Epicurean denial of afterlife; modern evangelism should likewise keep the resurrection at the forefront.
4. Call to Repentance: Paul moved from dialogue to demand—“God commands all people everywhere to repent” (Acts 17:30). Engagement with competing philosophies must culminate in this summons.

Related Biblical Passages

1 Corinthians 15:32 – “If the dead are not raised, ‘Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.’”
Colossians 2:8 – Warning against “philosophy and empty deceit.”
Romans 1:18-25 – The drift from acknowledging the Creator to serving creation.
1 Timothy 6:17-19 – A corrective to placing hope in temporal enjoyment.

Historical Impact

Early Christian apologists (Justin Martyr, Athenagoras) rebutted Epicurean materialism, arguing for creation ex nihilo and bodily resurrection. Though the Garden eventually closed, Epicurean themes reemerged in Enlightenment and modern secularism, illustrating the enduring challenge Acts 17 records.

Summary

The single New Testament reference to Epicureans is more than a historical footnote; it frames a timeless collision between materialistic pleasure and the gospel of the risen Lord. Paul’s address on the Areopagus charts a faithful path for believers who encounter contemporary echoes of Epicurean thought, calling them to proclaim the Creator, the nearness of God, and the sure hope of resurrection.

Forms and Transliterations
Ἐπικουρείων Επικουριων Ἐπικουρίων Epikoureion Epikoureiōn Epikoureíon Epikoureíōn
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Acts 17:18 N-GMP
GRK: καὶ τῶν Ἐπικουρείων καὶ Στοϊκῶν
NAS: some of the Epicurean and Stoic
KJV: philosophers of the Epicureans, and
INT: also of the Epicureans and Stoics

Strong's Greek 1946
1 Occurrence


Ἐπικουρείων — 1 Occ.

1945
Top of Page
Top of Page