2933. tamah
Lexical Summary
tamah: To become unclean, to defile

Original Word: טָמָה
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: tamah
Pronunciation: tah-MAY
Phonetic Spelling: (taw-maw')
KJV: be defiled, be reputed vile
NASB: stupid
Word Origin: [a collateral form of H2930 (טָּמֵא - unclean)]

1. to be impure in a religious sense

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
be defiled, be reputed vile

A collateral form of tame'; to be impure in a religious sense -- be defiled, be reputed vile.

see HEBREW tame'

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
a prim. root
Definition
to be stopped up, stupid
NASB Translation
stupid (1).

Brown-Driver-Briggs
[טָמָה] verb only

Niph`al Perfect נִטְמִינוּ we are stopped up, stupid Job 18:3 so Thes MV Di De Zö (Aramaic טַמֵּם, טַמְטֵם stop up (e.g. of ear or heart), , etc., and derivatives; Arabic fill or choke up); ᵑ9 Ew Hengst AV RV Da SS take it as metaplastic for נִטְמֵאנוּ we are regarded as unclean, see Ew§ 198 bi, 614; ᵐ5 reads נִדְמִינוּ σεσιωπήκαμεν; ᵑ7 טְמַעֲנָא.

Topical Lexicon
Semantic Field and Thematic Overview

טָמָה (tamah) embodies the idea of becoming polluted, defiled, or rendered unclean. While the wider Hebrew Scriptures employ several related terms for impurity, this particular verb appears only twice, yet it neatly captures the tension between ceremonial uncleanness and perceived social or moral contempt.

Canonical Occurrences

1. Leviticus 11:43 – “Do not defile yourselves by any crawling creature; do not become unclean or defile yourselves by them.”
2. Job 18:3 – “Why are we regarded as cattle, as stupid in your sight?” (lit. “as defiled”).

Though sparse, these occurrences span two very different genres—legal narrative and wisdom poetry—allowing the verb to illuminate both covenantal ritual and existential complaint.

Ceremonial Purity in the Torah Context

Leviticus 11 stands in the heart of the Holiness Code (Leviticus 11–20). The passage warns Israel against self-contamination through prohibited animals. Uncleanness in this sphere is neither merely hygienic nor symbolic; it is covenantal. To become טָמָה is to place oneself outside the sphere where God’s holiness dwells among His people (Leviticus 11:44–45). The command presupposes:

• Israel’s identity as “a kingdom of priests” (Exodus 19:6).
• A physical space (the sanctuary) where unclean persons were barred until cleansing (Leviticus 15:31).
• A moral dimension: external impurity hints at the deeper need for internal purity (Psalm 24:3-4).

Thus, the verb marks a boundary that protects both worshiper and sanctuary and reinforces the holiness motif that threads through Scripture.

Social and Moral Overtones in Job

In Job 18:3, Bildad employs the verb figuratively: “Why are we regarded as cattle, as stupid in your sight?” The complaint is not about ritual status but about reputation—Job allegedly treats his friends as τָמֵא, beneath human dignity. This usage shows that defilement language easily migrates from ceremonial law into the realm of honor and shame. To label someone טָמָה is to deny them covenant fellowship and communal respect.

Job’s narrative, placed outside Israel’s cultic setting, indicates that the concept of defilement resonated more broadly in the ancient Near East as a metaphor for disgrace.

Theology of Purity

Scripture consistently ties uncleanness to separation from God. Leviticus warns, “You must distinguish between the holy and the common” (Leviticus 10:10). The Prophets expand this: “Woe to me … I am a man of unclean lips” (Isaiah 6:5). The Wisdom Books convert the ritual term into a moral one: “He who justifies the wicked … both are an abomination” (Proverbs 17:15).

The New Testament keeps the trajectory. Jesus declares, “Nothing that enters a man from the outside can defile him … it is from within” (Mark 7:15, 18-23). Peter learns the lesson in the vision of unclean animals (Acts 10:14-15). Thus, the external prohibition in Leviticus 11 foreshadows a deeper call: holiness of heart.

Historical Development and Rabbinic Reception

Second Temple literature systematized defilement laws, ranking impurities and regulating contact. The Mishnah tractate “Tohorot” illustrates how richly the concept developed. Yet the core remained: טָמָה cut off the worshiper from sacred space until cleansing rituals restored eligibility. Contemporary archaeology (e.g., mikva’ot near first-century synagogues) confirms the pervasive concern for ritual purity.

Christological and Ministerial Significance

By assuming human flesh yet remaining sinless, Jesus interacted with lepers, corpses, and the hemorrhaging woman—sources of טָמָה—without Himself becoming defiled (Luke 5:13; 7:14; 8:44-48). In Him, holiness proves more contagious than impurity. Hebrews 9:13-14 contrasts “the ashes of a heifer” with “the blood of Christ,” showing that His sacrifice purifies the conscience, accomplishing what ritual could only symbolize.

For ministers of the Gospel the verb reminds:

• Sin always separates; cleansing is essential before communion.
• Holiness is not optional but flows from the new covenant (1 Peter 1:15-16).
• Pastoral care includes guarding congregations from moral compromise (2 Corinthians 6:17-7:1).

Practical Application for Believers Today

1. Vigilance against spiritual defilement: entertain no “creeping thing” (compromise) that dulls sensitivity to God.
2. Pursuit of cleansing: confess and forsake sin (1 John 1:9) rather than normalize it.
3. Extending grace: avoid treating people as inherently “unclean” when the Gospel offers them purification (Acts 10:28, 34-35).

Summary

Though only appearing twice, טָמָה bridges ceremonial law and human dignity, pointing to the ultimate need for a Redeemer who eradicates defilement at its source. From Leviticus’ dietary constraints to Job’s plea for respect, the term underscores a biblical axiom: fellowship with the Holy One requires cleansing, and that cleansing is fully realized in Jesus Christ.

Forms and Transliterations
וְנִטְמֵתֶ֖ם ונטמתם נִ֝טְמִ֗ינוּ נטמינו niṭ·mî·nū nitMinu niṭmînū venitmeTem wə·niṭ·mê·ṯem wəniṭmêṯem
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Leviticus 11:43
HEB: תִֽטַּמְּאוּ֙ בָּהֶ֔ם וְנִטְמֵתֶ֖ם בָּֽם׃
KJV: that creepeth, neither shall ye make yourselves unclean with them, that ye should be defiled
INT: shall not make unclean

Job 18:3
HEB: נֶחְשַׁ֣בְנוּ כַבְּהֵמָ֑ה נִ֝טְמִ֗ינוּ בְּעֵינֵיכֶֽם׃
NAS: as beasts, As stupid in your eyes?
KJV: as beasts, [and] reputed vile in your sight?
INT: regarded beasts stupid affliction

2 Occurrences

Strong's Hebrew 2933
2 Occurrences


niṭ·mî·nū — 1 Occ.
wə·niṭ·mê·ṯem — 1 Occ.

2932b
Top of Page
Top of Page