How does 1 Samuel 28:25 align with biblical teachings against consulting the dead? Text And Immediate Context “Then she set it before Saul and his servants, and they ate. And that night they rose and left.” (1 Samuel 28:25). The single verse closes the narrative of Saul’s clandestine visit to “the woman who had a familiar spirit at Endor” (28:7). It is a purely descriptive line summarizing hospitality and departure; the moral evaluation lies in the wider unit (vv. 3-25). Mosaic Law On Necromancy Long before Saul, God had issued unambiguous prohibitions: • “Let no one … practice divination … or one who inquires of the dead. For whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD” (Deuteronomy 18:10-12). • “Do not turn to mediums or familiar spirits” (Leviticus 19:31; cf. 20:6, 27). These statutes were delivered amid the same covenant code that forbids murder, idolatry, and theft; their moral weight is equal. Saul’S Own Ban—And His Hypocrisy Earlier, Saul “had banished the mediums and spiritists from the land” (1 Samuel 28:3). That policy was consistent with Torah. His nighttime secrecy in verse 25 highlights how far he had drifted: he broke the very law he once enforced. Descriptive, Not Prescriptive 1 Samuel records events, not moral endorsement. Scripture often narrates sin so readers see its ruinous end (cf. Genesis 34; 2 Samuel 11). The final verdict on the episode appears later: “So Saul died for his unfaithfulness … because he consulted a medium for guidance” (1 Chronicles 10:13-14). God Himself labels the act a transgression. Prophetic Judgment Within The Story Whether God temporarily permitted the real Samuel to appear (the traditional view supported by the medium’s shock in 28:12) or allowed a demonic impersonation, the message was identical: Saul would die “tomorrow” (28:19). The consultation produced no strategic advantage, only condemnation, underscoring divine disapproval. Biblical Anthropology And The Afterlife The scene touches Sheol theology: the dead are not roaming intermediaries. Job 7:9-10 and Eccles 9:5 show that the departed do not interact with the living at will. Consultation attempts bypass God’s appointed channels of revelation (cf. Isaiah 8:19-20), setting necromancy in categorical opposition to genuine prophecy. CONSISTENCY WITH New Testament REVELATION The NT maintains the ban: Jesus depicts an impassable gulf between the dead and the living (Luke 16:26), and directs seekers to “Moses and the Prophets” (v. 29). Mediatorship is now vested solely in the risen Christ (1 Timothy 2:5); prayers to or inquiries of spirits remain excluded (Revelation 22:15). Archaeological Corroboration Of The Period Excavations at Khirbet Qeiyafa and Tel Beth-Shemesh have unearthed 11th-century B.C. fortifications, pottery, and writing consistent with a centralized monarchy. Bronze arrowheads bearing early Hebrew letters (“lmlk”) align with warfare described in 1 Samuel 13-31. Such finds authenticate the historical backdrop in which Saul lived and died. Theological Purpose: Contrasting Two Kings Saul’s necromancy prefaces David’s God-sought guidance (1 Samuel 30:7-8). The compiler juxtaposes unlawful spiritual shortcuts with rightful dependence on Yahweh, foreshadowing the perfect obedience of David’s greater Son, Jesus (Acts 13:22-23). Implications For Christian Ethics And Spiritual Warfare Modern “channeling,” séances, and occult apps recycle ancient necromancy. The narrative warns believers to reject them categorically, rely on Scripture, and test spirits (1 John 4:1-3). Where curiosity arises, point to Christ’s resurrection—history’s definitive evidence that only God conquers death (Romans 1:4). Practical Application For Evangelism Highlight Saul’s fear-driven compromise: when people face crisis, they often grasp at forbidden spiritual experiences. Contrast that with the risen Jesus who offers verifiable hope. Documented miracle healings, such as cases collected by medical mission hospitals and peer-reviewed in journals like Christian Medical & Dental Associations’ Today’s Christian Doctor, illustrate that the living God still intervenes without occult mediation. Conclusion 1 Samuel 28:25 neither endorses nor excuses necromancy; it seals a narrative that demonstrates its folly. The verse aligns perfectly with the Bible-wide injunction against consulting the dead, presents a sober historical record upheld by manuscript and archaeological evidence, and ultimately directs readers back to the only legitimate source of revelation and salvation—the living God who raised Jesus Christ from the dead. |
    |